Privacy advocate challenges YouTube’s ad blocking detection::Irish eyes may not be smiling

  • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Louis Rossmann can go to fuck himself and his source available app that he keeps calling open source.

    Newpipe existed long before Grayjay and will probably be there when grayjay dies since Newpipe’s license allows community forks. If the Newpipe team ceases development, others will take their place. If Rossmann ceases development, his app is left for dead

    • ink@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Users telling developers to fuck themselves is a irony lost in these threads. How many open source projects do you maintain?

    • n3m37h@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless I am reading thus wrong, I do believe you are wrong here

      FUTO TEMPORARY LICENSE

      license grants you the rights, and only the rights, set out below in respect of the source code provided. If you take advantage of these rights, you accept this license. If you do not accept the license, do not access the code. Words used in the Terms of Service have the same meaning in this license. Where there is any inconsistency between this license and those Terms of Service, these terms prevail.

      Section 1: Definitions

      • “code” means the source code made available from time, in our sole discretion, for access under this license. Reference to code in this license means the code and any part of it and any derivative of it.
      • “compilation” means to compile the code from ‘source code’ to ‘machine code’.
      • “defect” means a defect, bug, backdoor, security issue or other deficiency in the code.
      • “non-commercial distribution” means distribution of the code or any compilation of the code, or of any other application or program containing the code or any compilation of the code, where such distribution is not intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
      • “review” means to access, analyse, test and otherwise review the code as a reference, for the sole purpose of analysing it for defects.
      • “you” means the licensee of rights set out in this license.

      Section 2: Grant of Rights

      1. Subject to the terms of this license, we grant you a non-transferable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.
      2. You may provide the code to anyone else and publish excerpts of it for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution, provided that when you do so you make any recipient of the code aware of the terms of this license, they must agree to be bound by the terms of this license and you must attribute the code to the provider.
      3. Other than in respect of those parts of the code that were developed by other parties and as specified strictly in accordance with the open source and other licenses under which those parts of the code have been made available, as set out on our website or in those items of code, you are not entitled to use or do anything with the code for any commercial or other purpose, other than review, compilation and non-commercial distribution in accordance with the terms of this license.
      4. Subject to the terms of this license, you must at all times comply with and shall be bound by our Terms of Use, Privacy and Data Policy.

      Section 3: Limitations

      1. This license does not grant you any rights to use the provider’s name, logo, or trademarks and you must not in any way indicate you are authorised to speak on behalf of the provider.
      2. If you issue proceedings in any jurisdiction against the provider because you consider the provider has infringed copyright or any patent right in respect of the code (including any joinder or counterclaim), your license to the code is automatically terminated.
      3. THE CODE IS MADE AVAILABLE “AS-IS” AND WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED GUARANTEES AS TO FITNESS, MERCHANTABILITY, NON-INFRINGEMENT OR OTHERWISE. IT IS NOT BEING PROVIDED IN TRADE BUT ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS ON OUR PART AND IS NOT MADE AVAILABLE FOR ANY USE OUTSIDE THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. ANYONE ACCESSING THE CODE MUST ENSURE THEY HAVE THE REQUISITE EXPERTISE TO SECURE THEIR OWN SYSTEM AND DEVICES AND TO ACCESS AND USE THE CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE. YOU BEAR THE RISK OF ACCESSING AND USING THE CODE. IN PARTICULAR, THE PROVIDER BEARS NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERFERENCE WITH OR ADVERSE EFFECT ON YOUR SYSTEM OR DEVICES AS A RESULT OF YOUR ACCESSING AND USING THE CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE OR OTHERWISE.

      Section 4: Termination, suspension and variation

      1. We may suspend, terminate or vary the terms of this license and any access to the code at any time, without notice, for any reason or no reason, in respect of any licensee, group of licensees or all licensees including as may be applicable any sub-licensees.

      Section 5: General

      1. This license and its interpretation and operation are governed solely by the local law. You agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the local arbitral tribunals as further described in our Terms of Service and you agree not to raise any jurisdictional issue if we need to enforce an arbitral award or judgment in our jurisdiction or another country.
      2. Questions and comments regarding this license are welcomed and should be addressed at https://chat.futo.org/login/. Last updated 7 June 2023.
      • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Subject to the terms of this license, we grant you a non-transferable, non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty-free license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.

        note how this explicitly leaves out modification.

        You may provide the code to anyone else and publish excerpts of it for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution, provided that when you do so you make any recipient of the code aware of the terms of this license, they must agree to be bound by the terms of this license and you must attribute the code to the provider

        once again, they exclude modification of the code.

        no forks can be made because they aren’t allowed to modify the app in anyway.

        Additionally, the termination clauses say that they can just terminate your rights to use the code if they feel like it, no other reason needed. This is a direct attack against open source.

        • n3m37h@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          l think they want grayjay to be a starting point as you can use the code still.
          This is still far better than any proprietary software. At least this can be audited

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Source available is open source by definition. Get mad at other things, but that is absolutely a fair description

      • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        by definition?

        the Free Software Foundation, the ones that started the whole idea of sharing code as a philosophy of software, do not consider source available as free software or “open source”.

        It does not meet Eric S Raymond’s definition, the one who invented the term “open source”.

        It does not meet the Open Source Initiative definition either.

        Even Wikipedia gives the right definition of open source:

        They grant the recipient the rights to use the software, examine the source code, modify it, and distribute the modifications.

        So stop defending Rossmann and admit that the app is not open source.