• ThatGirlKylie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I meant more like staying the party you were elected but voting only for the other side while never voting for your side. Not actually switching to the other side officially.

    • jiji@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, gotcha! I think they would likely be ousted pretty quickly if they tried that.

    • Astongt615@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      In theory one could do this, but then you lose all backing from your party, and the side you “switch to” probably sees you as a double crosser, so you don’t have their trust either.

      I’d also like to point out that in a bit ahitty system, switching sides doesn’t mean “never vote for you old side on anything.” That’s the point of having a larger group of people with different ideas. People may not align on everything, but there are some things we should be able to agree on, or at least discuss better than elementary school children before saying “he’s not in my club so I don’t care WHAT he has to say!”