Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ukraine needs all the air defense they can get. Russia has been signaling they will try again to freeze the civilian population this winter.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      If we’d shift funds from Israel (who are committing genocide) to Ukraine (who are defending themselves) it helps Palestine and hurts Russia too.

      Is a win/win.

      Imagine if Ukraine had the iron dome America bought Israel.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Imagine if Ukraine had the iron dome America bought Israel.

        I know your heart is in the right place but ID barely covers a city and operating costs are extremely high. Right now the missiles that the ID system uses cost something around $1,000,000 each so defending just this latest bombing run would have been $90,000,000 USD.

        No one could afford to operate the system even if it could be built.

        • LaLiLuLuCo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          ID interceptor missiles are more like $50k-150k a piece, but multiple are fired during each interception to increase chances of a successful hit. The amount fired already since the 7th is still probably in the $1-2 billion range if you estimate conservatively.

          Iron Knife and Iron Beam are much cheaper per shot (~$4 and $2500 respectively) but are developed by Israel itself in collaboration with US military industrial contractors. The Gaza war is a giant live fire test for them and countries including the US and India are lining up to buy them.

          Iron Dome as a whole thing array also includes David’s Sling and the Arrows which cover different type of attacks. I. E. Cruise and ballistic missiles amongst other things.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            You are correct I just didn’t want to get into the details of how the system works. I think my main points still stand; the technical challenges of expanding a system like that to cover a a whole country would be massive and actually running it would be far too expensive.

            • LaLiLuLuCo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Oh yea for sure it’s not feasible for anyone except maybe the US and in specific areas and along dangerous borders.

      • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So you want Israel to be bombed even more and everyone there killed? Because that’s the plan of Palestine and Lebanon (which is genocide btw). And would happen if they didn’t have the iron dome.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Those bombings only happen because of retaliation to turning their country into a concentration camp.

          Terrorism can not be justified, but I doubt many (including you) would act differently if you were in the situation Palestine is in.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Palestine did plenty much on their own to turn Gaza and West Bank into places not good to live in. Decisions I would definitely not share since I am not an Islamic non-democratic women-and-LGBTQ-hating anti-Semite.

            They are not concentration camps. Perhaps you should look at how concentration camps worked if you try to compare the two.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Israel, just like Russia, can simply stop occupying territories which don’t belong to them and stop a genocide. And no one will be killed. Stop apologizing the genocide, ok?

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Hamas attacked an area that did not belong to Palestine. And the areas they are constantly shooting rockets at are also not the areas that Israel took unrightfully. The idea that Palestine is only defending and not attacking doesn’t fit their agenda or their behaviour in the past and now.

      • Bezerker03@lemmy.bezzie.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        11 months ago

        Israel is defending itself as well. They just have a better counter attack success rate. Or did we forget that Ukraine also wants to bomb Moscow etc. (and has launched drones etc).

        The key difference is one is a gov one is a terror org who represents their gov.

      • BB69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        58
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Imagine all the dead Jews that would cause too.

        Palestine isn’t a nation of saints.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Israel assassinates journalists and sells weapons grade hacking technology to oppressive regimes.

          Also, until Israel started their ground assault Jews hadn’t really been dying since 7 October. Almost all deaths since then have been Palestinian.

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        63
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is a lot of misinformation in your comment.

        The United States didn’t fund Israel’s iron dome system.

        There isn’t a genocide (race / tribe killing) in Gaza. That’s a population transfer or eviction of lands.

        Ukraine and the United States are working together to implement a air defense system. A likely defense treaty and a 100 year lease on military bases in exchange for infrastructure rebuilding is on the table.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          There isn’t a genocide (race / tribe killing) in Gaza

          Genocide isn’t just killing…

          In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

          Killing members of the group;

          Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

          Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

          Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

          Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

          https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/genocide.shtml

          And even if that was just indiscriminate killing based on race/ethnicity, the UN is already saying what Israel is doing amounts to that

          https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2023/11/gaza-running-out-time-un-experts-warn-demanding-ceasefire-prevent-genocide

          Your opinion is your opinion.

          But what is/isn’t a genocide is clearly defined in the Geneva convention. And even if you’re definition was correct, the UN disagrees with you about Israel meeting that definition.

          • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The UN’s humans rights body is heavily biased against Israel. And in general not a neutral party as you seem to think.

            Of the 193 countries which make up the UN, the majority (133) are non-democratic states. 48 are countries belonging to the OIC (Organisation of Islamic Cooperation).

            Of the 280 human rights condemnations the UN has found world wide between 2006 and 2023, 103 where in Israel. They found none in, for example, China, Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. They also didn’t cry genocide during the genocide in Rwanda.

            I 100 % believe Israel commits war crimes against Palestine. But I do not believe that Israel alone is responsible for almost 40 % of all human rights violations world wide since 2006.

        • rah@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s a population transfer or eviction of lands.

          Jesus christ.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Ethnic cleansing is the systematic forced removal of ethnic, racial, or religious groups from a given area, with the intent of making a region ethnically homogeneous. Along with direct removal, extermination, deportation or population transfer, it also includes indirect methods aimed at forced migration by coercing the victim group to flee and preventing its return, such as murder, rape, and property destruction.[3][4][5] It constitutes a crime against humanity and may also fall under the Genocide Convention, even though ethnic cleansing has no legal definition under international criminal law.[3][6][7]

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_cleansing

              • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                22
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Yes, stupid people (United Nations for example) use the wrong word, all the time, especially when it’s translated from another language. Genocide is the wrong word to use. Israel is not wiping out nor trying to wipe out the Palestinians.

                • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Since you’re the top mod, can I just remind you that you broke rule 5?

                  Or do I need to report your comment?

                  You’re still not understanding though, and it’s very important as a mod you understand this issue. Otherwise I’d have stopped replying already.

                • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  This ain’t an etymology thing. Definitions are clarified for legal purposes. I think you have to ask yourself why you’re trying to dig your heels in against a literal definition. They didn’t define it wrong, it’s literally defined in excruciating and exacting detail for legal purposes.

              • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Incorrect word.

                The use of a loaded latin word like genocide is used to invoke mass killing and wiping out a population completely. If you see it used you know the source is extremely biased and should not be taken as fact.

                Use the correct language so you don’t look like a fool.

  • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    Looks like it’s all going according to Putin’s plan.

    I’m the last guy to put on a tinfoil hat, but the whole situation seems like it was engineered by Russia to take pressure off their war with the Ukraine.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Take the pressure off to help optics but also to squeeze any western support

    • abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d say it’s simpler than that. Russia keeps funding regions it wants destabilized so something bad is always happening at a time good for Russia.

      No tinfoil hat, but total Scumbag Putin.

    • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      More likely an opportune moment for Putin. The Gaza conflict seems to have been primarily stoked by Iran over concerns of growing positive Israel and Saudi Arabia relations

      • TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And Russia has been purchasing large amounts of Iranian munitions. It’s not that far fetched for Russia to simply throw some money at Iran to throw a bit less money at Hamas to start some shit

    • nicetomeetyouIMVEGAN@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There was no real indication for the scope and intensity of the hamas attacks. Based on US and Israeli Intel. There were some kind of warning signs, but nothing pointing to this ferocity. I think fighters got far further than they could dream of, and the severity of the response is a direct reaction to the failure of the isreali army to see and stop the attack. It’s difficult to believe that the kremlin had more and better information to know that an attack would lead to war on the scale we see today. And I’m willing to believe that Russia sees benefits in arming hamas through the lens of geopolitics, they aren’t controlling the actions of hamas in any meaningful way, I certainly don’t believe that.

      Putin is just taking advantage and is absolutely never harmed by being seen as some kind of geopolitical mastermind. He isn’t.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Given how much Putin spent on Israilian DPI and their other… systems, I don’t see it impossible.

  • MrFlamey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fuck Putin, the warmongering cunt. I hope Ukraine continues to get Western support and can kick Russia out of their country, however slim the chances might be looking right now. Russia extending its influence and things gradually going back to business as usual, only for them to do it again in another 10 years won’t be good for any Western democracies.

    Haven’t really been following the Israel/Palestine thing much to be honest, but it would be nice if people would stop killing one another. Also really sucks that it benefits Putin.

    • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      I truly feel like if we let Russia get anything that might count as a positive for them from this war, there will definitely be a new war of at least similar scale, but probably significantly worse and significantly less contained.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is sad to see Putin’s oligarchs “honorable buisnessmen”, while everyone else should cross border naked and without phones or laptops. If they were lucky enough to get visa in the first place.

      in another 10 years won’t be good for any Western democracies.

      Another 10 years of Putin won’t be good for any democracy. Fuck Putin.

  • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Can we please give the armed forces of Ukraine finally airplanes? The offensive is going nowhere if they are not supplied with an edge in combat gear.

    • mifan@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Unfortunately it’s not that easy.

      They have already got a large sum of F16’s, but it takes training of Ukrainian pilots before they can be used in combat.

      From what I understand they should be ready to fly in early 2024. That still a long time to go - but you don’t want to lose pilots or planes because of inexperience with that type of airplane.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The planes aren’t what’s taking time. The F-16s are either being used for training, which is totally unnecessary as that training takes place in the US, and we have a few hundred of the things pretty much just sitting around, or are on standby to be deployed. The training of the pilots is what’s taking time. I suspect Putin knows he’s about to lose air superiority, and this attack is a demonstration of that. He’s using what little weapons he has left, while he still can.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Nothing the West is willing to provide is going to change the course of the war alone. That ship has sailed, this is back to an attritional war with positional fighting.

      The only thing the West can do now is provide LONG term commitments, written in law e.g. locked in funding for 5+ years of arms transfers.

      Unfortunately, I don’t know how good the odds are that will happen. I hope it does, but we’ll just have to wait and see.

      The ONLY other way for either Russia, or Ukraine, to win, is a new technological development that enables a significant change to the current battlefield dynamics.

      This is a fairly simplified analysis, but it does align with the most current assessments provided by both the Ukrainian and Russian military leadership.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    It is amazing how the news cycle dropped Ukraine so fast. Not good for getting US support, but I think Ukraine can still get support from Europe.

    • satan@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      dropped?

      we never drop our money makers just because you don’t hear about it. Double the wars, double the profits. what are you even talking about? All I see is money money money. now we get to ask for even more money as there is more demand and limited supply.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lol to the comments saying it is engineered by Iran and Russia.

    WHILE ISRAELIS MINISTER ASK THE GOVERNMENT TO NUKE GAZA

    AND THE OTHER TO STOP PEOPLE FROM HARVESTING OLIVES IN THE WEST BANK. WHICH SHOULD NOT BE UNDER THERE RULE ANYWAY…

    If you allow and support Isreal attack on Gaza Without any form of accountability of War Crimes Based on UN definitions of War Crimes, Russia will do the same…

    • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      and at least, they do that against a sovereign and military state - and West providing ammunition and weapons.

      Israeli is really a piece of shit!

  • acidagfc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Makes sense, UN can only produce a finite amount of concern, not enough to express it on 2 major conflicts.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        You don’t understand what the UN is. It’s a common misconception.

        The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others. It’s to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

        The UN doesn’t have any way to do anything, it’s merely a fancy forum. Its members could meet at the UN and decide to do something (although it can be legally complicated) but that’s not on the UN.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The purpose of the UN is to have a diplomatic environment where all can be heard in front of all others.

          A dialogue that fails to yield productive policy is mere busy work.

          It’s to encourage diplomatic solutions to problems and to defuse conflicts.

          Right now we’re having a debate over whether a ceasefire would be antisemitic. That’s not a conversation that behooves diplomatic solutions or defuses conflicts. It just serves to distract public attention while folks in Gaza are exterminated.

          • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            We all hope that you’ll graduate into the diplomatic corps of whatever place you’re in and single-handedly solve the world’s problems. Best luck to you.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              There’s certain openings. Since the war started, even Biden’s designated state department armies dealer can no longer stomach the job.

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Putin sees there’s no consequences for butchering thousands of civilians. Proceeds to do the same.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      What makes you think this is his first time? Have you been paying attention at all? Are you somehow oblivious to the thousands of Ukrainian civilians who’ve already been killed by Putin? This selective outrage blows me away. Have you been asleep for the last year and a half? This is the madness of crowds.

      • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Putin has killed fewer civilians in Ukraine in 2.5 years than Netanyahu has in Gaza in 30 days. Israel has shown that there are no costs for him to escalate dramatically as it’s clear the world won’t do anything.

  • salvador@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    One day US and EU propaganda claim that Putin and Russia are on a brick of collapse, that the russian army is unable of anything and UA is winning. The next day they’ll cry that the same russian army is 1st or 2nd strongest in the world, that it overpowers UA in all ways possible despite that US and EU help the latter.

    And so on back and forth. Yet they claim that they don’t engage in propaganda and misinformation.

  • antidote101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Israel dropped 6000 bombs in one week, on an area much smaller… More children have died in the first 25 days of the current Israeli conflict than in a year of the war on Ukraine.

  • downpunxx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    11 months ago

    Russia ----> Iran -----> Hamas

    Israel, the USA, and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia were in the midst of high level talks for KSA to recognize Israel with the United States providing a weapons package to KSA, and then 4000 “Palestinians” stormed the Israeli border on October 7th, raped, burnt, beheaded and slaughtered close to 2000 Israeli citizens, causing the largest loss of Jewish life, in any single day, anywhere, since the end of the Holocaust