What exactly is the debate here? I literally can’t even tell what the argument is supposed to be lol
Lmao of course anarchist organizations have mounted self defense, and there’s some lessons learned for what happens when you don’t. There’s also some lessons to be learned from the USSR what self-defense on a national scale looks like.
Reads as: you can’t debate me. Objective proof is hard to argue against which is why you haven’t.
If that interpretation makes you happy, then go on and believe that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You’re cute, I do love a persistent idiot. You know refusing to accept your wrong just detracts from any argument you’ve made before.
Love it, keep on boo boo.
What argument?
Pick one.
You don’t know any argument that I’ve made either, do you? :3
Which one.
I’m waiting for you to supply one. ^^
What a bad faith argument, we’ve been talking about your interpretation of an idiom that I have proved you are wrong about.
What exactly is the debate here? I literally can’t even tell what the argument is supposed to be lol
Lmao of course anarchist organizations have mounted self defense, and there’s some lessons learned for what happens when you don’t. There’s also some lessons to be learned from the USSR what self-defense on a national scale looks like.
Madison needs to tell me how much they rule.
Yeah, I’m sure we disagree on a fair bit, but I think we’re still both communists, I can’t tell what their deal is.