• YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Presidents do not control the economy, Presidential Administrations do impact an economy. The only President I know that killed an economy was Trump due to allowing covid to rage out of control and denying that it was happening.

    • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taking covid seriously was not going to save the economy. It would’ve saved lives, but the economic impact of covid was a global one.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was only a global impact because of widespread denial of the facts. Trump was at the forefront of that denial from the beginning, and many other countries seemed to follow his lead. Much of global impact could have been avpided entirely of Trump had instead decided to listen to the doctors that actually deal with epidemics and insisted people follow the basic protocols from the beginning before it expanded due to lack of action, instead of vilifying the medical community at every opportunity.

      • Zuberi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You forget if we had been inside for 2-4 weeks it would have been over.

        Plenty of other nations were done with it well before us.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everybody complains about the shut down, but we didn’t have a shut down. Half of Americans kept walking around, fighting mask requirements and coughing on shit deliberately. Schools closed, but so many went to private schools and makeshift daycares, and it wasn’t even the kids spreading it. Doctors stopped seeing patients and sent everyone to the ER. Millions died preventable deaths.

        • th0mcat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No. You would have had to keep every citizen from every country inside for 2-4 weeks and enforce incredibly strict N95/KN95-only mask policies. If you have a single city not doing zero-COVID in this scenario, you lose containment.

            • th0mcat@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You seem to be stating if the US response had been 2-4 week strict lockdowns that we would have eradicated COVID.

              I am telling you no, it wouldn’t have prevented much unless every single human being on the planet was also in lockdown for the exact same 2-4 week period.

              • Zuberi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Seemed to work for so many countries but sure let’s go w/ that lol. Americans will die on any/every hill.

      • Saneless@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes but pretending like it didn’t exist and allowing it to spike harder than ever, so bad things has to be shut down, was a big negative impact

        He told his followers it was bullshit and they acted accordingly, spreading it like mad

        • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And before people say that it didn’t need to be shut down, they ignore that the hospitals were overwhelmed and could have been even more overwhelmed if we didn’t have mask mandates and/or lock downs. People were being denied health care because the hospitals had no space.

    • EmperorGormet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about repealing the Glass-Steagall act under Clinton? You cant look at things in a vacuum because impact from policy is delayed. 2008 didn’t happen because Bush signed one or two documents, it was decades of policy and corruption. Saying “The only president you know” seems quite unfair. Regardless if you think Trump is a shit-bag or not.

      • kgbbot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump is absolutely a shit bag but also a terrible leader and bottom rung president who was so shitty it made Bush 2 look slightly competent.

    • Temple Square@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In fairness, it was either or:

      • Take COVID seriously

      • Not destroy the economy

      Early lockdowns probably saved a million lives. But the supply chain issues we’ve faced since are the ripple effect from those two/three months. Countries like China that took the pandemic more seriously faced worse economic fallout.

      Additionally, the previous administration signed off on Congress sending each us of unemployment, PPP, and thousand dollar checks. All of that helped enormously.

      I hate the previous president personally, and feel he’s the most unqualified man to ever hold the office, and feel he’s the closest we’ve ever had to a fascist coup. But that does not mean every decision of that administration was automatically wrong.

      • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are we already forgetting what happened 3 years ago?

        STATES and the CDC called lockdowns while the president told people it would just pass, it could be cured with sunlight, to drink bleach, and take horse dewormer.

        Trump did NOT take covid seriously.

        How many of the million people that died were due to him playing make believe is hard to measure, but he killed people by telling them bullshit.

    • cyd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t even know if you can say that Trump killed the economy. If you look only at the economy, then comparing the US to Europe, the US economy weathered the pandemic much better. Congress, under both Trump and Biden, passed very generous support packages. The Biden package was arguably too generous, and kickstarted the current inflation.

      And inflation is the main reason polticially-disengaged people “feel” that the economy is no good under Biden. Last I checked, real wages for blue collar workers are still lower than when Biden took office.

      • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This won’t be a popular opinion on Lemmy, but I agree. Biden is far from the worst president we’ve had, but some people tend to whitewash his flaws because he’s not an orange dullard LARPing as Hitler.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rage out of control? So operation warp speed means nothing to you huh…

      You were probably one of the many who screamed racist when trump banned chinese people from entering in Feb 2020. You probably also applauded when Nancy Pelosi said to visit China town in SF days before shutdown.