- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
A pay-to-see-no-ads is not the same as pay-for-privacy.
They do point out they won’t use your personal info in ads if you pay, by choosing the free option you consent for personalized ads
Doesn’t mean they won’t collect your info anyways. What has Meta done to prove that they are worthy of our trust? Nothing.
It pretty much makes it clear that they are absolutely going to continue collecting your data – they just won’t use it for ads. They wouldn’t have needed to specify that otherwise.
Ad-free != Privacy
“It’s free and always will be”
Oh in Europe only. Not in the US. The news article should have specified that in the title
Nah, American news also fail to specify “only in the US” every time. So it’s kind of refreshing to see the tables flipped for once.
No! It’s actually free: Simply stop using Facebook!
Guarantee you pay $10 and your privacy still isn’t protected.
