• The Octonaut@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are receiving billions so that their users use Google search - why is this a question?

          • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            No. That would be if they set up Apple Search and sent some or all of the resulting data to Google.

            This is much worse. They don’t have to do any work, and so they have no control over what data their devices give Google.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d prefer something more secure but all of them just suck. I use DDG but more than half the time I end up needing to use !g to get the google results because DDG just isn’t that good.

      • GigglyBobble@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I really wonder how people making such claims use it. I’m a dev and have to search daily and constantly and hardly ever don’t I find something and when I don’t, the Google bang doesn’t help either.

        But maybe DDG just works well for technical stuff.?

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I’m searching for something very specific, I’m generally searching a site I already know will have the answer. So if I’m looking for how to do something with code or devops tools, I to limit my search to stackoverflow or another forum first, or the respective sites for their documentation.

          For all of that, DDG works perfectly. And that’s what I use it for most of the time. I will use it to search within sites a ton. Like if I want to get information about a person, event, whatever, I’ll search Wikipedia first and dive through the article and sources there.

          Where it tends to fail, and it could be my own fault, is just general searches where I’m not sure exactly what I’m looking for. Google is better at interpreting what I’m searching for and returning relevant results. DDG is like “here’s your results retard, search better next time”.

      • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        DDG is also a for profit venture and uses privacy more as a marketing ploy. They’ve been caught allowing Microsoft trackers.

      • mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ive been using bing and bing copilot more and more for general stuff these last few months. Google needs to up their game. Other than that I use ddg as my first point of call

        • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          DDG largely uses the Bing API anyway so there’s no reason to use Bing itself over DDG. Bing is as bad or worse than Google for privacy.

          I’m going to keep using DDG just out of principle and hope that their own crawler continues to get up to speed. They’ve definitely gotten better over the years but still leave a lot to be desired for search.