• RatMaster@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say it’s more like disguised feudalism. We’re all peasants for the few kings and queens that have all the money at the top.

    • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think people actually agree on the definition of capitalism itself, I just looked it up and was a little surprised how definitive it is:

      an economic and political system in which a country’s trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit.

      If you asked whether capitalism is a political system, at least in my random polling, 2 out of 9 respondents said No.

      • EhList@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That is because it is not a political system. It does not describe where legitimacy is derived from nor how the government should be structured.

        Capitalism is an economic system with as little government intervention possible.

        • Platomus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Capitalism is an economic system with as little government intervention possible.

          Doesn’t the bolded part make it a political system then?

          • EhList@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it does not because it does not dictate what kind of government should regulate or to what degree.

            • Platomus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Lobbiest that work for companies do that constantly because of Capitalism. It’s an entire field of work.

              • EhList@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Lobbyists exist because of freedom of assembly and freedom of speech laws. The strongest lobby in the USA without question is the AARP because their voter list is the most likely group of voters and they are nowhere near the largest donors. Anyone talking about lobbying in the context of capitalism is unfamiliar with either concept in any level.

                For pete’s sake most capitalist nations do not have lobbying.

                Capitalism is not a political system. You can have monarchal capitalist systems, fascist capitalist systems, oligarchic authoritarian capitalist systems, heck plutocratic democratic republics like the USA can be capitalist. Socialism is both political and economic but not all ideologies are both.

                • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  fascist capitalist systems

                  Pedantic man to the rescue! Fascism was a “third way” from “capitalism” and “communism”. Fascism means state control (if not ownership) of “the means of production”.

                • markr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  most socialist systems participated in the capitalist economic system. The USSR, for example, attempted to create the capitalist mode of production that was almost entirely lacking when the revolution overthrew the czarist regime. They had to, according to their marxist theories, in order to develop a proletariat with a revolutionary consciousness. Similarly China was faced with an economic system that was the shambles left over from the long degeneration and colonial exploitation of the ancient regime, and proceeded to attempt to build a modern capitalist economy under the control of the party, as the USSR was doing. In both the USSR (except for the brief period of the NEP) and the initial attempt during Mao’s lifetime, the market exchange was not used to set prices or drive production and planning, but instead top down ‘5 year plans’ were used. They didn’t work well, why is a complicated discussion, they actually might work a lot better now using the vast compute, information and communication tech available. The USSR under Gorbachev attempted to reform both their political and economic systems and collapsed. China looked at that and reformed their economic system, allowing much of the economy to be market based rather than planned, while keeping political control under the party. Their reform has been spectacularly successful in modernizing their economy, so successful that the USA at this point is determined to sabotage their system and, if necessary, destroy them militarily rather than allow them to dominate the global system.

                  • EhList@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There’s no reason to suspect we have become good enough at prestidigitation to make a strictly controlled and planned economy a logical choice. It might be less of a mistake than in the past but that dies not mean it is a good idea.

                • Platomus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  None of that changes that the capitalist system and capitalism have a direct impact on other areas of government.

                  • EhList@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes but that us still different than being a political system or philosophy as there are no specific recommendations or directives that stem from capitalism.

          • uberkalden@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say no. It doesn’t really describe how a political system works other than commenting on the regulation part.

            • Platomus@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Same as any other economic political system.

              You’re just describing a political system.

                • Platomus@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What do you mean by one policy?

                  Capitalism influences many areas of government directly.

                  It’s not just economics. It’s foreign policy, company regulations, individual protections, land ownership rights, etc. It’s an ongoing list. Even cultural rights are directly impacted by Capitalism.

                  It is one policy of a larger system.

                  Right, it’s an economic system that directly influences many parts of government.

        • markr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          that is the ideology of classic liberal and neoliberal governments in the history of capitalism, capitalism itself is simply investing ‘money’ (aka capital) to produce commodities that are then exchanged for more money that is then fed right back into the loop to produce even more commodities to make even more money. The term commodity can refer to things that are intangible, like financial instruments - stocks, bonds, derivatives of stocks and bonds, derivatives of derivatives of stocks and bonds etc. Capitalism is the core of the global economic system. It is not an ideology. There are many countries (but fewer than there used to be) that are either socialist or social democracies where capitalism is highly regulated.

          • EhList@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The vast majority of those social democracies would describe their systems as mostly capitalistic for example all of Scandinavia refers to their systems as primarily capitalist.

          • EhList@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No it does not. It neither describes how resources are allocated nor how force is used. It merely posits less government intrusion in private business actions. It is in no way a political system and can be applied to very different systems.

        • viliam@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Government intervention goes the other way: capitalists like intervening into government.

          • EhList@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            All business likes intervening in policy that is by no means unique to capitalism.