• 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I always install gparted in the live environment 😂… cuz… yeah, I can fuck things up and end up without my data 😂.

      • thehatfox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I see a lot of people saying they have to use a GUI tool for partition management, and I’ve never understood why.

        Text based tools like parted are fairly easy to use, at least compared to other terminal tools the same people are able to use for other tasks.

        What is it about partitioning that needs a GUI when other tasks don’t? Is it the visual representation of the partition layout? A general fear of borking a disk?

        • aard@kyu.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Problem nowadays is that changing partition tables is so rare that parted changes their commands between uses, and I never remember if fdisk nowadays has all the GPT related issues that made me try parted in the first place ironed out. Plus I can’t remeber the new GPT commands and partition IDs.

          I still mostly just read the help text every time because nothing else is installed - but from the speed I might be a bit faster with a well designed GUI nowadays if it is about modifying GPT disks. MBR disks I still can do with fdisk in my sleep.

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Is it the visual representation of the partition layout? A general fear of borking a disk?

          Yes

          Being able to see it helps a lot. I can and have done it via parted. My media server doesn’t have a desktop environment installed. I just really would rather have a GUI when it’s available as an added safeguard.