Looks like my first time hearing about those is from them being removed

Interesting. Why is chrome faster than chromium? I thought chrome was chromium with bells and whistles.

The issue is… I think it’s gonna be hard to find a non-Nestle candy.

Exactly, the bottom 10% don’t have enough money, meaning that any money you give them will go towards consumption. The top bracket’s spending as % of income or wealth is tiny and is mostly independent of their income. Their money is spent on investments, not basic goods and services. They practically don’t affect inflation.

I think money should be printed during periods of low inflation. E.g. Japan could have benefited from that. After this bout is over, governments can return to printing, carefully.

I already know I’m gonna be downvoted for this, but the top 1%/0.1% spending isn’t gonna change, whereas the bottom 10% will cause inflation… That’s why there’s no magic bullet.

Also this and this

See this post. The work is sponsored by the NLnet Foundation

Lemmy core devs are actually employed full time to work on lemmy.

And they say lightning doesn’t strike the same place twice. Wow! 😮😮😮

Vlemmy refugees flocking in?

I think the main problem is that guys don’t understand what makes an attractive guy attractive. At least I don’t.

It’d be great to support identity based on a key hash, so that it’s completely decoupled from any instances. Maybe some time in the future.

She’s real!

Your tone and your assumption that everyone else is an idiot is irritating.

The key part of your first sentence is “via Proton”. Support for client side gpg is easy and they’re not doing it either out of some strategic play or purely out of stubbornness. Working on standarts is great! I’ve had a “Visionary” subscription to Proton for years, since before the VPN and all the extra stuff. I like the company, overall. But, as mentioned in my first comment, this is the singular most annoying part of their service to me.

Internally, yes. So, they only allow it if it’s under their control. This wouldn’t be a customer servie nightmare because only people who know how to use it would use it. Plus, their version of PGP doesn’t encrypt the subject.

Sounds more like an attempt to kill off gpg to win the market.

It’s a simple ask, not bending over backwards. I bet they haven’t touched the email encryption part of code in years, so it doesn’t add any maintenance burden either. I’ve looked at what they do - the only thing they’d need to change is their handling of email headers!

Yes, what’s the problem with that? Services should provide as much flexibility as possible.

Why is that a fault in logic? The features are orthogonal. One doesn’t restrict the other. All other, normal, email providers allow client side gpg use.

I don’t want to upload anything. Why would they ever not allow that?