

I’m tired of them quoting phone sizes by screen size as opposed to… well… the actual size of the phone.
Most people will hear 6.3" and think well my old phone was 4.3", clearly this is going to be vastly larger, completely forgetting that bezels these days are practically non-existent, whereas they used to take up half of the frontal area.
The original Galaxy Note had a 5.2" screen. By modern standards that’s puny. You’d assume that phone is absolutely tiny. Yet the Note is actually 14% larger than the current S25 Ultra with a 6.9" screen.
I mean the galaxy note (2011) is still larger than plenty of phones now, so it doesn’t seem absurd. They were large and still are.
Note: 146.9mm x 83mm x 9.7mm (total volume 118,269mm³)
S25: 146.9mm x 70.5 x 7.2mm (total volume 74,566mm³)
The note is 59% larger. Yet people seem to look at the specs and say “it only has a 5.2” screen, it must be way smaller than the 6.2" screen phones of today"
I don’t get why reviewers conflate phone size and screen size. They aren’t the same.
Shit, let’s even compare it to the S25 Ultra (so the big one with a 6.9" screen).
The Note, despite the 5.2" screen size implying the phone is tiny in comparison, is 14% larger.