In their defense, double negatives don’t not make for confusing headlines
In their defense, double negatives don’t not make for confusing headlines
That’s got to make for some nice photos even at ground level.
owo / 10
Big Floppy Slams San Francisco
I believe this is scientifically referred to as temporary borbitude.
Well how about that.
Excuse me, I asked for a VENTI lizard
“This bitch lost”
Keep digging. You can’t rush a good pizza.
From the link:
Since its founding in 1954, high-energy physics laboratory CERN has been a flagship for international scientific collaboration. That commitment has been under strain since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. CERN decided to cut ties with Moscow late last year over deaths resulting from the country’s “unlawful use of force” in the ongoing conflict.
You could learn the topics covered by a recognized certification like RHCSA / LFCS. No need to actually get the certification if you don’t feel like it, but look at the subjects covered and learn that stuff. That should give you a good foundation.
Seriously though, trying to understand a detail about how this all works (anyone free to answer). Does each additional user to a smaller instance indirectly help flesh out the available content on that user’s instance?
As in, more total users -> more total community/magazine subs by those users --> more federated content becomes visible to the instance’s newest joiners after that?
Unless I’m misunderstanding how it works. If that’s correct, then the benefit of each additional user would be most visible the fewer the instance’s current users, and then eventually level out as more users join and the most popular remote communities/magazines are subbed by local users.
I mention this because I’ve occasionally browsed other instances during brief outages on my home instance. At those times I noticed that while the default feeds (not logged in) across instances looked mostly the same, some of the smaller ones were missing some fun/interesting magazines that the others were showing.
Well there’s no way they didn’t know what to expect!
I read a while ago that humans probably have ants out-chonked since some time ago when we started gaining weight as a population.
Had to check back on this since that little factoid has stuck with me since reading it.
Per this journal from 2022, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2201550119
Integrating data from all continents and major biomes, we conservatively estimate 20 × 1015 (20 quadrillion) ants on Earth, with a total biomass of 12 megatons of dry carbon. This exceeds the combined biomass of wild birds and mammals and equals 20% of human biomass.
Because if there’s anything worth getting scientific about, it’s us vs the ant horde.
at least it’s not “moist”
( ͡◉◞ ͜ʖ◟ ͡◉)
Fedia’s been great.
There are a handful of other choices, too: https://joinmbin.org/
Yeah I’d take that advice with a grain of basalt