There are very few transplant surgeons who would take the risk of a partial liver transplant which they have high likelihood of being a death sentence for the patient (not sure if you read but they need a full liver, from a cadaver, not partial,) and want to willingly throw their name in with another patient to discuss during M&M.
This is coming directly from familiarity with the procedure, comorbidities, and other factors from a general surgeon at a top 10 hospital in the US.
I honestly wouldn’t expect to see a lot of that, being that in my anecdotal evidence the majority of K-12 educators would likely fall under a more generalized population, than what lemmy currently is, which is generally very technical and STEM oriented.
All the other subs on Reddit didn’t exist until general population got pulled in with memes, and started partaking in communities there. Lemmy is just like Reddit was, when Reddit was young.
It’s not like giving away part of your liver is a zero sum game, now that person is at risk of infection, has lesser liver performance, and for what? Someone who has showed they will just continue to harm themselves, and others (the person they’re getting the liver from,) if you allow it?
I don’t know any other surgeons who would do that.
No, it’s dependent on window size and other factors so you would likely have to manually arrange the attendees for this to work.
I think your bias may be showing. The average computer user doesn’t even think about using a password manager. It just exists and works in their browser.
Have you ever flown on a Frontier or Spirit flight?
The way that profiles works today is the reason I don’t use it. Chrome just handles it all so gracefully between profiles and opening links from other applications.
To be fair, everything is on-demand now, but it doesn’t change their greediness.
And offline. And in the quality you define. And on any device.
The owners of archive.today explicitly block using CloudFlare DNS because it doesn’t provide sensitive geolocation information which is optional as a part of the DNS standard.
You can Google archive.today and CloudFlare, there’s tons of blog posts and articles.
Edit: https://jarv.is/notes/cloudflare-dns-archive-is-blocked/
I’m really sorry this happened to you.
I’m not going to share my credentials, but yes the explanation is reasonable. Any time that you attempt to reperfuse dead tissue, you’re setting yourself up for acute issues like yours, or hemorrhaging.
There’s a lot of factors in this that are unfortunate, but I think no matter the situation, the liver was on it’s way out, regardless of the diagnosis or reasoning.
Just FYI for anybody that looks it up, it appears to be a paid application.
It’s been in the Chrome extension for at least a year.
I feel like it’s a temporary formality to avoid backlash. I’m sure this is one of Bibi’s top staff.
He’s there to test the waters.
This is where I think the flaw is in your system. You wouldn’t necessarily want to give your friends evul-friends@foo.com. Because once you start getting spam to it, you can’t nuke the email, because more then one person has it.
This is why one address per recipient or service makes the most sense. Not user defined, but completely random or maybe what the Fastmail automated emails do.
I suggest doing some market research before building your product/service so you are designing something that has the best fit for your consumer, and I think Fastmail handles things better than your service would right now, based upon what you’ve shared.
Fastmail offers this as well. I suggest looking into their offerings.
I think Fastmail already handles this gracefully, and has all the right integrations. Why should I use your service over Fastmail?
For example, the integration with Bitwarden can generate a new username for every site you go on.
I think to an attacker, your naming allows for identification of the pattern.
Also, 100% spam identification… nothing in the world is 100%. Unless you count the verification for someone to send you an email, which I don’t know if I consider spam identification.
I’ve personally been messaged on a few different platforms saying that I can be a seller for marketplaces and make 2500+ USD a week. I assume that it’s these big companies that they’re talking around as to try and not spill the beans because I assume it’s below the line in some way.
For some people that may be pretty lucrative.