horseshoe theory doesn’t apply to every leftist group […] research their backgrounds to see if they’re authoritarian first

hence why I say to be wary and why I say I’d vote but not in every circumstances though BrainInABox makes fair points against it

fair enough

well you’re entitled to your opinions but you don’t seem to try to argue in good faith your points to favor your reasoning

deleted by creator

• science denial/esotherics
• selective exclusion from basic rights

No true progressive leftist would be in for either of the two, but in regards to the other two it can become tricky to know

One very helpful concept is the tolerance paradox

Or simply ignore the gaslightning that tolerance is a paradox and take it as a social contract where both ends must comply, if one won’t then you shouldn’t take for granted the other should

Radical leftism means in essence:

• everyone is the same
• everyone deserves the same satisfaction of their needs
• a roof over your head, food and drink are inalienable rights.

Any progressive leftist would agree with those things hence why I’d be all for them and as you said there are exceptions in radical left where they shouldn’t be taken seriously

Not in all cases as I said between a radical left and a right-winger you might be better voting for the radical left but why I say to be wary is because of the Horseshoe Theory

If you were to say progressive leftists is where I’d be all for

I didn’t know about those groups, thanks for bringing light to it although I’d be wary of voting radical left unless the alternative is only a right-winger