Because people would probably rather believe it’s some conspiracy by Apple to purposely nerf the cheaper iPhone.
Because people would probably rather believe it’s some conspiracy by Apple to purposely nerf the cheaper iPhone.
People will hate it, but it’s a very logical explanation
And to think Stroll’s contract was just renewed
What’s the earliest a driver has ever clinched the title?
I mean I’ll certainly agree to Alonso, Button, and Rosberg since they’re champions. But I would say Ricciardo was tougher against Max than Valtteri against Lewis.
I wish I shared your optimism
The only way to do that is to stop needing oil.
Agreed, not just seems like such an oddity. But I believe the new USB-C iPad is 2.0, so whatever “hack” they did for that is probably what they’re doing for the iPhones. Seems almost like they rushed it with the incoming regulations.
I think the chances of that are pretty solid, but it will apparently still be USB 2.0 speeds.
Well I’d imagine I’d go like anytime someone doesn’t follow a court order; you get jailed and/or fined in contempt of court.
A lot of the courses in Arizona aren’t using potable water; they’re using treated waste water.
That’s my thinking.
Every large organization, private or public, that I’ve interacted has been basically just a bunch of different people in many different silos. I’m surprised to see so many people have this “well oiled machine” perspective of the government where apparently it is all seeing and all knowing.
In all but the most niche cases, they do in fact know that you had a kid.
How would the IRS know that? The only way I could think of would be the Social Security department sharing the information with the IRS; and are they legally allowed to do that? But let’s even say that’s true; if the parents aren’t married and filing jointly, who gets to claim the child as a dependent? That’s a decision made by the parents (or local courts in case of custody battles), so not something the IRS would decide.
Basically what it seems to boil down to is that filing taxes is complicated because the tax law is complicated.
You seem to have a very optimistic view of the efficiency of governments. I mean the IRS is basically running on a budget of table scraps after being defunded for decades.
Sure, that would be simple enough for them to mail you a letter with like “we’re aware of these incomes from these employers” and any failure to file additional income on your part makes you liable. And of course not filing to claim any credits/deductions on your part just screws your out of your own money.
But then that also assumes the IRS knows your address. Does your employer even report your address when your taxes are withheld from your paycheck? And what if you move in the time between then?
But that’s only really makes sense in like the simplest of cases. The government doesn’t know if you had a kid this year, or maybe you bought an EV, or maybe you started renting out a room in your home.
If all you have is a single W2 income; then by all means go to your local library, grab a 1040-EZ form, fill it out, and drop it in the mail. Will probably only take you 10 minutes or less.
But that is relatable to his supporters, he’s living their dreams. If they were rich, they’d want you have sex with porn stars and live in a gold penthouse.
But how did that person acquire the copyrighted work? Was the copyrighted material paid for?
That’s the crux of the issue, Open AI isn’t paying for the copyrighted work they are “reading”, are they?
Poor Charles, I can relate to the “brain completely shuts off when put on the spot” syndrome.
Relegate the bottom team to GP2!