I don’t want to spam the comments section by copy and pasting the same message twice, but someone else made a similar point so I’ll link my response
I don’t want to spam the comments section by copy and pasting the same message twice, but someone else made a similar point so I’ll link my response
Yes, the comic is satire. The satire is “men getting treated the way female r*pe victims get treated”. Implying that male sexual assault doesn’t happen or that when it does, people actually believe them, when in reality men who are victims of this often just don’t speak up at all because when they are, they’re either not believed, called “gay” for not enjoying it, or it ends up reported with a headline like “female teacher has sex with male student”.
The fact she posted this comic on men’s mental health awareness day and proceeded to engage in arguments with male victims of SA in the comments - who were then banned without a chance to appeal - as well as her past of seeking out her critics to argue with even in other subreddits heavily indicates that this was inflammatory on purpose.
…did you respond to the wrong person or are you just making shit up to be mad at because you don’t have an argument?
Receipts have been posted above. Respectfully, I hope more people realize that when someone tries to paint every single one of their critics as being a misogynistic incel, that its a manipulation tactic. (Even though, yes, reddit is full of those too)
I find it really distasteful that she makes comics “in support” of trans people while denying those born as male can experience sexual assault. It’s just a different, more subtle/socially acceptable form of transphobia.
Here’s a r/SubredditDrama post that covers what was said before mods nuked the comments section
And another with more proof of mods nuking comments
Don’t forget about the comic she made downplaying the seriousness of male r*pe on mens mental health awareness day, and the arguments she participated in under her own post with male victims of SA.
Look like, I assume, even though I had no pictures of myself or anything that could be mistaken for one on my profile. But he wasn’t wrong about me being fruity so 🤷♂️
Still don’t understand what the california roll part was supposed to mean though
Thanks for this info, I know it’s probably not a factor for most but dismissing the existence of a group of people as “political” is a definite dealbreaker for me.
Funniest way to get permabanned
And even though there was actually no threat of violence, disputing the ban will do nothing because there are no humans reviewing the ban appeals (speaking from experience)
Yup. Was permabanned for “advocating for violence” by saying a certain green hatted man was justified in his actions. And before that, a week long ban for directly quoting Rump’s unhinged rambling during the debate to make fun of what he said.
Freedom of speech =/= freedom of consequences. If people choose not to associate with you because you support & attempt to normalize a movement that has historically committed mass genocide, or - god forbid - they speak negatively about you in an internet forum 5 years down the line, those people are just exercising their free speech.
The fact he brought up his pardon umprompted as if he thought it would be his get out of jail free card makes it hard for me to feel empathetic. Especially since there’s a real possibility some cops have let him off scott-free in the past just because of his involvement in J6.
Freeze as in keep it from reinstalling? And what app?
Anti-homeless infrastructure is canon in the Pokémon universe now I guess
Limiting them yes, paywalling them though?
I’m not trying to unilaterally defend the decision, it’s just not going to make me personally switch browsers. From what I’m hearing a lot of the viable alternatives are forks of Firefox anyway.
Look up Twitch Ad Solutions, there’s a github page where you can find a couple different options. The Alternate Twitch player another commentor mentioned is what I use because I like the adjustable chat and auto-collect bits feature
Reading the responses of the women in the comic you seriously think this situation isnt a metaphor for sexual assault?
In your other thread of replies to me you’re stating that it is but we’re supposed to disagree with them. I’m not sure why you feel the need to defend her so strongly that you’re simultaneously making 2 conflicting arguments and completely ignoring the other behavior I mentioned but I’m not really interested in continuing this discussion with you because I’ve presented the facts and it’s clear you’re personally unwilling to consider that this comic was made in bad faith