• 0 Posts
  • 232 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2024年9月15日

help-circle



  • You said you couldn’t buy a small truck, not that you couldn’t buy a truck the same size as 20 years ago.

    A. I clarified to find me one of the same size as a 1990 model.

    B. Isnt this exactly the same argument your making? There is huge demand for small trucks, the ranger was a top seller when it was discontinued. And when it was brought back, its a slightly smaller version of the f150, and nothing what people want.

    They also had the ability to put in smaller batteries if everyone was clamoring for super thin phones. They just weren’t.

    You really are that dense. The battery tech was not there to allow thinner phones without compromising capacity. The strongest market desirablity is battery life. But people also want smaller phones. Hell, futurama made this joke in 2001


  • The new ranger is just a tiny bit smaller than the f150 It absolutely is not the same or even close to the size of ranger 20 years ago.

    The closest in size “truck” to the old ranger is the maverick… but thats a unibody UTE, hardly comparable.

    Uh, no. That would only be true if all models of phone from the same factory were made exactly the same way with the exact same machines. That’s not the case. They make different models of phone. They could easily make one model with a user replaceable battery and a different model without one.

    Sure… if there was enough demand for replaceable batteries… but there is not. Basically the vast market is content with the cheaper option.

    That’s a BINGO! So if that’s true, then they absolutely had the ability to do that for the first decade of smart phones.

    Again… smaller battery smaller capacity… a battery of the same physical size 15 years ago was much less enegry dense.

    Its ok. You can be wrong. Just learn from the experience.


  • I said smaller battery and connecters allowed for thinner phones.

    And mass production is cheaper than low production. So if all phones are designed the same, then the factories can be tooled all the same accross all models.

    People actually did like the form factor and function of iPhones, false equivalency much?

    So why are you confused manufacturers are copying Apple?

    I’m not going to do your Truck shopping for you. If you can’t figure that out on your own, ask your parents.

    But you said they exist… it should be easy. Unless… you were talking out of your ass again.



  • thinner phone requires a smaller battery. Smaller battery is smaller capacity.

    That’s silly. They removed the ability, they didn’t give people a choice. No one was asking, no one chose this.

    Noone asked for phones to copy the iphone… yet here we are.

    Did you know that in the U.S. Texas makes all of our school textbooks worse because it’s easier just to print the stupid textbooks than print separate ones for just Texas because Texas is such a big market. This is not a conspiracy theory, you can look it up if you are interested.

    So close to getting it… smh

    You can buy small trucks in America. What are you talking about?

    You can? Show one new model that is the same size of a 1990 ford ranger.


  • Was anyone asking for thinner phones? They had the ability to make thinner phones by disallowing replaceable batteries for a decade and did not.

    A. They did not have the ability because doing so would reduced battery capacity because the tech is battery still maturing.

    B. Apparently people are asking because people are still buying. Just because me and you arent asking doesnt mean the greater market isnt.

    As it is now with 99.9% of all phones you can buy not even giving you the option, I’m not buying it.

    A. That would mean the entire world is in on the conspiracy.

    B. I cant buy a small truck in america. Does that mean there is a grand conspiracy?