staticlifetime

In comparison to just installing completely unsandboxed apps?

If you’re on NVIDIA or KDE, you may have been thinking that this Wayland thing is just not working. For those of us running Intel on GNOME, it has been a smooth ride for a long time now. So, we just have vastly different experiences.

ThinkPads DO come with Linux preinstalled. They offer Ubuntu and Fedora Linux. They are also certified for RHEL.

ThinkPads are the de facto Linux laptop.

Not just Lenovo. ThinkPads.

I switched from Bitwarden to using Pass for reasons like this.

I have the same Logitech keyboard, but I don’t recommend it. The touchpad has no multitouch and scrolls terribly. For what we paid for it, you’d think it would be better than that. Beautiful design and solid feel otherwise though.

The fact that you need a group policy to turn this kind of garbage off is ridiculous.

It just depends on how isolated that part of the kernel is. Unsafe code should be done only in interop, and so it still theoretically has a memory safety benefit over C in that sense.

In terms of how much interop code needs to be written for Rust at this point is another discussion though.

You could decrypt a GPG key-based file to do that.

I can attest that this also helped me as well. Thank you!

Didn’t you see the slave labor clause in there? You’re indebted for at least 3 decades when you start a new GPL project.

power-profiles-daemon is now archived? Dammit, that was a big one for Fedora.

Graphical:

• Firefox
• Inkscape
• NewsFlash
• GNOME Podcasts
• Text Pieces

Non-graphical:

• Ansible
• Neovim
• Podman

Damn, and I thought my IBM 5150 with its 512KB of RAM was light.

GNOME is opinionated and beautiful. Lots of focus on reasonable design instead of massive amount of customization. It also has a great app ecosystem and documentation. I love it.

No, I mean Red Hat engineers. Despite being a wholly-owned subsidiary of IBM, they are separate orgs. This probably doesn’t mean anything to you, because you are mad at Red Hat, but that doesn’t mean that the decisions made were done by IBM’s executives, and most IBM engineers probably aren’t running Fedora Linux.

Fedora is just flat-out king for desktop IMO. It has packages that are new, but not unstable. Lots of Red Hat engineers use it as a daily driver, so fixes come quick, and it has a pretty large user base. It’s made for this stuff.

Right. This is the only right answer when it comes to a compromise between developers and users.

OpenSUSE is not a fork. It’s the base.