Not that kind of “use!”

That’s… a big gap. I think I’d just be confused all the time if I had to switch between them.

C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.

I can think if plenty of situations where system time is

• Optional
• Unreliable
• And even potentially disallowed by the user

In fact, if you don’t set up your containers right, the system time is almost always wrong.

Amazon has a non-existent customer support, so you may have limited options.

If they had customer support, I’d suggest contacting them and tell them to either refund, or else you’d give them the ID immediately followed by a GDPR request to purge your data. That might have gotten some movement, because those GDPR requests have the force of law, and are also a fair PITA for Amazon. However, there’s no way to give them a shot across the bow. I think your options are:

• process a charge-back, as someone else suggested, which might result in an Amazon ban
• take the loss (that’s entirely your call, regardless of anyone else’s opinion)
• give them the ID, get your refund
• you can still initiate a GDPR purge request. I’m going to guess it’s going to result in a block, but maybe not. You might be able to recreate your account

The happy news is that you are protected by GDPR. Many of us are not, and don’t even have the option to demand they purge the information.

This is really good to hear. As someone who hasn’t used Windows since 2004, it’s easy to lose perspective of how daunting a self-switch can feel.

I’m glad to hear your experience is going well. I know you’re experiencing many little annoyances and things which seem harder than they should be, but are not focusing on those. It’s always good to hear the perspective from a new user!

If that’s the only error mechanism, sure. Exceptions in most languages tend to be relatively expensive, though, and most have a cheaper idiomatic way of returning error codes; you’d want to use those if they’re available, right?

Does Rust use exceptions a lot? I don’t know. V has panic and catch, but you almost never see them. Idiomatic is Option (?) and Return (!) values, which I thought V borrowed from Rust. Go does the (val, error) tuple-ish return thing, and while it too has catchable panics, they’re discouraged in favor of (error) return values.

Depends on the language. “Higher level” is a pretty broad field!

At first it wasn’t an issue: I used Voyager for this account, and Interstellar for the alt. Then I decided I liked Interstellar’s interface more and started using it for both. Both list the account in most places, but Interstellar doesn’t show it when replying.

I started making enough mistakes that I played with the settings and discovered Interstellar links the color theme to the account, and now I can easily tell which I’m using.

I’m certain I’ll continue to make mistakes. Thorn is surprisingly seductive, but the real issue is that auto complete and autocorrect on my phone keyboard has decided that the correct spelling for “the” is “þe”. I could correct it, but I feel bad for it; it’s just trying to he helpful.

Gosh darn it, am I using thorns in this account again?? I didn’t mean to.

I recently learned that only Icelandic does that. Eth was dropped early in old English, and thorn was used in both places. Additionally (as I understand it, now), while thorn was a direct “th” (voiced or unvoiced) sound, even when eth was in use it want orthographically a simple replacement for voiced “th”.

I guess Icelandic kept it, but eth was not in use through most of the old English, medieval period. And then the Normans came, and fucked written English completely up.

I need to check, but I think OnlyOffice is a Russian company. Some people might care about the latter part.

The connection between OnlyOffice and Russia has caused some controversy. The company has moved headquarters and attempted to hide its Russian ties through shell companies. The company develops its product in Russia and presents itself in the Russian market as a Russian company. For this reason some Ukrainian businesses have moved away from OnlyOffice.

Wikipedia has more info (with references) for the curious.

Second this.

• message delivery can be iffy
• VoIP works well
• you connect with people like a normal app that isn’t going to scare your family off, not trying to get them to put in GUIDS
• it has all the creature comforts, attached/embedded photos, markup, attached files, attach pictures, share your location for 10 minutes (I’m on my way), history editing, deleting
• it has concurrent multi device support, so you can get messages on your phone, tablet, and desktop at the same time
• There’s a full desktop client (Electron, i think 🤮 but it works)
• the dev team is small and they seem to like to work more on features than user issues. development is slow
• multi-person groups work fine

It’s still the best E2E messaging system I’ve found; the only one my mom, wife, and sisters-in-law reliably use.

I just want them to focus on fixing the sketchy DHT that seems to cause every problem.

Penalty: the equivalent of $100, probably. And even that will be contested; the second judge will drop it to $50, and the third to $10, and then the Meta lawyer will pay that out of her pocket change.

You’ll be absolutely thrilled to hear that I discovered that I can assign different color themes to different accounts in my mobile app, so these sorts of crossover mistakes should be greatly reduced.

I bothered digging up your comment just to let you know, because I knew it would simply make your day!

Toodles!

I started using the same client for both by “normal” account (this one) and my toy account (my pþþþt one) but have discovered that now it’s impossible hard to tell which one I’m in once I start replying. And I flip between them often, so now I’m accidentally posting eths and thorns here, and forgetting them more in the other account.

It’s a conundrum. I’m losing sleep over it, really.

Salem’s Lot.

It was forbidden, but on TV, so I’d flip channels to watch it in 30 second clips. It was far more terrifying that way, as I found out later in life; watched all the way through, it was a fairly mediocre film.

What I love best about that song are the vocal renditions on YouTube. It’s quite moving when it’s sung without the pop beat.

That’s the broken behavior I see. It’s the evidence of a missing understanding that’s going to need another evolutionary bump to get over.

Yeah, for me it’s more that just “produces correct output.” I don’t expect to see 5 pages of sequential if-statements (which, ironically, is pretty close to LLM’s internal designs), but also no unnessesary nested loops. “Correct” means producing the right results, but also not having O(n²) (or worse) when it’s avoidable.

The thing that puts me off most, though, is how it usually expands code for clarified requirements in the worst possible way. Like, you start with simple specs and make consecutive clarifications, and the code gets worse. And if you ask it to refactor it to be cleaner, it’ll often refactor the Code to look better, but it’ll no longer produce the correct output.

Several times I’ve asked it for code in a language where I don’t know the libraries well, and it’ll give me code using functions that don’t exist. And when I point out they don’t exist, I get an apology and sometimes a different function call that also doesn’t exist.

It’s really wack how people are using this in their jobs.

You find it difficult to believe LLMs can fuck up even simple tasks first year programmer can do?

Did you verify the results in what it gave you? If you’re sure it’s correct, you got better results than I did.

Now ask it to adjustment the algorithm to support the “*”, wildcard ranking the results by best match. See if what it gives you is the output you’d expect to see.

Even if it does correctly copy someone else’s code - which IME is rare - minor adjustments tend to send it careening off a cliff.

Thanks! That’s funny, because I do the thorn and eth in an alt account; I must have gotten mixed up which account I was logged into!

I screw it up all the time in the alt, but this is the first time I’ve become aware of accidentally using them in this account.

We’re not too far from AGI. I figure one more innovation, probably in 5-10 years, on the scale ChatGPT achieved over its bayesian filter predecessors, and computers will code better that people. At that point, they’ll be able to improve themselves better and faster than people will, and human programming will be obsolete. I figure we have a few more years, though.