I have no doubt people will be able to hack it. What I’m saying is there is no way it could be hacked without the company finding out and forcing you to return it or pay up. When you sign up you have to give them your personal information and credit card. If you disconnect it from the Internet, filter its Internet traffic, or modify it in any way they will tell you to return it and if you don’t return it they will charge the credit card.
From their terms of service:
In order to use the Product and Services, You will:
(a) Use the Product as the primary television in Your household;
(b) Keep the Product connected to WiFi and internet; and
© Not use any software on Your WiFi network that with advertising blocking capability.
(d) Not make physical modifications to the Product or attach peripheral devices to the Product not expressly approved by Telly. Any attempt to open the Product’s enclosure will be deemed an unauthorized modification.
If we discover that You are not abiding by the requirements above or have disconnected the Product from an internet connection or WiFi for more than short periods each month, You will no longer be able to use the Service and You must return any Products in your possession to Telly. Failure to return Products to Telly will result in Telly charging the credit card on file.
No, the maker has stated they have measures in place to detect any tampering, and that if you tamper with the device, fail to connect it to the Internet, or do not use it frequently they will make you return it or pay for it.
They have said that they can’t stop people from doing that, but that the settings menus, such as the input switcher, will be on the bottom screen.
The settings menus (input switcher, etc) will be on it. Also it will collect data on anything you view using the main screen (HDMI input, etc) regardless.
They have stated they have measures in place to detect anyone trying to do that and will require them to return the TV or pay for it.
You need to link to the image itself, not the imgur page:
This ![](https://i.imgur.com/M5oKxTY.jpg)
will look like this:
This: ![](https://imgur.com/M5oKxTY)
will look like this:
Makes sense, my town only has 3 sets of escalators that I know of so I don’t see many.
I love walking and I do it every day, but I don’t want to have to do it.
I’ve never noticed this.
I’d say carrying him. If he can be tossed he can be carried.
“In addition, we have received this image submission earlier today from an anonymous member of our community, who also offered the c/reddit moderation team, and I quote, “one Barbie-llion dollars”, to set it as the community banner. We’re not sure what to make of this”
“In the week ending June 3, Bud Light’s sales revenue—the brand’s dollar income—was down 24.4 percent compared to the same week a year ago.”
"The company’s global CEO, Michel Doukeris, said on May 4 that the declining Bud Light sales represented about 1 percent of Anheuser-Busch’s global volume.
The saturation is cranked to hell. I love the photo otherwise but the sky is not that deep blue at that elevation.
You can just pinch to zoom
To answer the “why not” part of that question, copying from one of my previous comments:
There’s an enormous amount of content uploaded to YouTube, as much as 30,000 hours of video uploaded per hour. That’s around 1PB per hour assuming most videos are uploaded in 1080p.
I wasn’t able to find an official source for what YouTube’s total data storage is, but this estimate puts it at 10 EB or 10,000,000,000 GB of video.
On Amazon AWS that would cost $3 Billion per month to store. The actual cost to Google is probably much lower because of economy of scale and because it is run by and optimized for them, but it is still a colossal figure. They offset the cost with ads, data collection, and premium subscription, but I would imagine running YouTube is still a net loss for Google.
Same, the ability to access Google drive, OneDrive, and Dropbox files alongside your local files is awesome.
My guess on what is happening:
The app makes a temporary copy of the settings data when the settings page is opened. The settings UI elements are connected to the temporary data. When the user clicks save, the app overwrites the actual settings data with the temporary data, but if they exit without saving the temporary data is discarded.
The blocklist settings page interacts with the actual settings data directly and thus doesn’t need to be saved, but the blocklist is also stored in the temporary settings data; saving overwrites the changes the user just made with the cached version from before they opened settings.
Personally I would prefer that the save settings button be done away with completely and all settings changes be effective as soon as they are made. This would be far more intuitive for the user and is how it works in pretty much every other mobile app I’ve used.
Especially now that there are settings subpages, it is unclear whether using the save button in a subpage saves all the settings or just the one on that subpage, and whether or not using the save button on the main page saves the settings in the subpages as well.