Right, I find LLMs are fundamentally no different from Markov chains. It doesn’t mean they’re not useful, they’re a tool that’s good for certain use cases. Unfortunately, we’re in a hype phase right now where people are trying to apply them for a lot of cases they’re terrible at and where better tools already exist to boot.
Should the research he’s discussing also be disregarded? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2410.05229
When you feel the need to slander people because you can’t engage with reality. as a side note, the fact that you can’t even spell CPC correctly is hilarious.
That’s what happens when you start drinking your own kool aid thinking that Russian army is on the brink of collapse fighting with shovels.
That’s right, this is far too important for the hoi polloi to have a say in.
I mean how else are they supposed to ensure continued western support?
And don’t forget how the government engages in autocratic practices like having judges being elected instead of appointed.
IDF firing at Irish peacekeepers with no response from the administration would be a fitting capstone humiliation for Biden.
Yeah, I think a propaganda article from the burgerland is laughable, as would anybody with even a couple of functioning brain cells to bang together. The post illustrates how western media propagandizes against sovereign countries. Thank you for providing an example of a gullible westerner whom this propaganda is aimed to brainwash.
It’s not an autocracy. It’s a democratically elected government that represents the interests of the people.
Independence from the US is precisely what’s facilitating the right of people to choose their own destiny.
fully automated luxury communism on the way :)
Saying something can be proven in principle isn’t very useful in practical terms. The fact of the matter is that the real world is simply too complex for the human mind to fully understand from first principles. Science is fundamentally about creating models of the world that are useful approximations of reality, it’s not a black and white thing. Asimov explains this well here https://mvellend.recherche.usherbrooke.ca/Asimov_anglosaboteurs.pdf
The link I used clearly shows what people mean by the western world, the fact that it doesn’t include Japan or Korea isn’t the own that you seem to think it is. Of course, I never expect any sort of intelligent response here. lol indeed
What part of the government is making information illegal are you struggling comprehend? If there was some magical anti-censorship platform that was usable by regular people then it would just be banned, and then people using it would be arrested. This is not a technology problem.
It’s incredible that it needs to be explained that the issue is with the censorship regardless of what particular service is being censored or what you personally happen to think of it.
Actually we do know that there are diminishing returns from scaling already. Furthermore, I would argue that there are inherent limits in simply using correlations in text as the basis for the model. Human reasoning isn’t primarily based on language, we create an internal model of the world that acts as a shared context. The language is rooted in that model and that’s what allows us to communicate effectively and understand the actual meaning behind words. Skipping that step leads to the problems we’re seeing with LLMs.
That said, I agree they are a tool, and they obviously have uses. I just think that they’re going to be a part of a bigger tool set going forward. Right now there’s an incredible amount of hype associated with LLMs. Once the hype settles we’ll know what use cases are most appropriate for them.