@tst123@lemmy.world to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-210 months agoTIL that John Lennon's son had to buy back postcards sent to him by his father from his widow Yoko Onowww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1596arrow-down120
arrow-up1576arrow-down1external-linkTIL that John Lennon's son had to buy back postcards sent to him by his father from his widow Yoko Onowww.youtube.com@tst123@lemmy.world to Today I Learned@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-210 months agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@foggianism@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish26•10 months agoAustralians wouldn’t agree with you on your stance on Yoko. She’s too bad of a person.
minus-squarebillwasherelinkfedilinkEnglish7•10 months agoFrom what I’ve seen I envy Australians on their creative uses of that word. But it’s seems as if it’s usually not really a derogatory term there.
minus-square@ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish7•10 months agoIt’s both. The way the first commenter used it was unambiguously “they’re a fucking shit person”. There has to be a qualifier for it to be positive.
minus-square@OscarRobin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish3•10 months agoDepends on how it’s said and any adjectives.
Australians wouldn’t agree with you on your stance on Yoko. She’s too bad of a person.
From what I’ve seen I envy Australians on their creative uses of that word.
But it’s seems as if it’s usually not really a derogatory term there.
It’s both. The way the first commenter used it was unambiguously “they’re a fucking shit person”. There has to be a qualifier for it to be positive.
Depends on how it’s said and any adjectives.
“He’s a good cunt”
Vs. She’s a right cunt