Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has ordered a limited number of U.S. troops to prepare for deployment in support of Israel, as reported by multiple sources.

Approximately 2,000 troops have been selected to be on standby for advisory and medical assistance.

The troops will be drawn from various branches of the U.S. military, including those already stationed in the Middle East and nearby Europe.

While their specific units and deployment locations have not been disclosed, it has been emphasized that they will not have a combat role.

The U.S. is extending support to Israel, which is engaged in a conflict with Hamas, primarily focusing on intelligence and planning assistance for potential hostage rescue operations.

  • @Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Whatever anyone says about the historical context aside, in the plainest of terms this war began with an enormous assault by Hamas against Israel, and so the US is bound by treaty to assist - whether they like it or not.

    • fiat_lux
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      I doubt the pentagon made this decision ignoring the wider context and long-term motivations of all parties involved, and I think it would be a mistake to reduce any conflict in the world to such a simple equation.

      Also, does Israel have a defence treaty with the US? This is a genuine question. I was under the impression there was only a tax treaty, and Israel isn’t a member of NATO either, which I thought would exclude that.

      • BaroqueInMind
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        I don’t know if you’re asking because you’re trying to get conversation going here for the benefit of all of us here, or are too lazy/dumb to do a search, but here you go either way: U.S. & Israel defense treaty..

        • fiat_lux
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          It was because I used the search term “us israel treaty” and it came up with tax treaty results, when apparently it’s called a “bilateral defense cooperation agreement” or “Strategic Partnership Joint Declaration”. I apologise for not being fully informed on the differences between those concepts beforehand, and not knowing that the word ‘treaty’ would not be applicable in a situation where the word ‘treaty’ was being used to describe it.

          too lazy/dumb

          Thanks for also reminding me that I shouldn’t ask questions unless 100% healthy.

          • BaroqueInMind
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No, you’re good; no need to apologize. I’m more dumb than you so it balances out. Please do not mind me.