• mrbubblesort
    link
    fedilink
    318 months ago

    Why? That’s literally been the entire point of arming Taiwan for the past 50 years. It’s even stated in the article, the US gives them enough so that China doesn’t get stupid and start something, but not enough so that Taiwan gets stupid and start something.

    • @Filthmontane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -148 months ago

      Why would China start anything if they haven’t started anything in 50 years? What if another 50 years goes by and China still hasn’t started anything? Isn’t that just a waste of weapons?

      • @toybastard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        They would start something for the same reason Russia started something in Ukraine.

        The goal is that another 50 years go by and they don’t start shit.

      • @Rinox@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        Because I’m the last 50 years they didn’t have a military powerful enough to assure a swift and painless victory. That’s the whole point of why china keeps increasing their military and why Taiwan needs to do the same. The moment China has a critical force, they’ll attack, they have announced it loudly and repeatedly in the past decades.

      • @assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        No, that’s the whole point. It’s like nukes. The nuke itself isn’t the big deal, your ownership of one is. If a country was threatening to invade you, and you responded by threatening to nuke them if they do, they’ll stand down.

        It’s the same idea here. The weapons are a deterrent. It’s a sheathed sword to tell your enemy that you’re armed and able to defend yourself. We don’t actually want to use the weapons. It’s a threat that there’s plenty of firepower to fight an invasion.