Two of the three victims specifically singled out by the New York Times in a marquee exposé published in December, which alleged that Hamas had deliberately weaponized sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, were not in fact victims of sexual assault, according to the spokesperson for the Kibbutz Be’eri, which the Times identified as the location of the attack.

The Times article described three alleged victims of sexual assault for whom it reported specific biographical information. One, known as the “woman in the black dress,” was Gal Abdush. Some of her family members have contested the claims made by the Times. The other two alleged victims were unnamed teenage sisters from Kibbutz Be’eri whose precise ages were listed in the New York Times, making it possible to identify them.

When asked about the claims made by the New York Times, Paikin independently raised their name. “You’re talking about the Sharabi girls?” she said. “No, they just — they were shot. I’m saying ‘just,’ but they were shot and were not subjected to sexual abuse.” Paikin also disputed the graphic and highly detailed claims of the Israeli special forces paramedic who served as the source for the allegation, which was published in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, and other media outlets. “It’s not true,” she told The Intercept, referring to the paramedic’s claims about the girls. “They were not sexually abused.”

  • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -34 months ago

    The UN team did way more than that. It “conducted 33 meetings with Israeli representatives, examining more than 5,000 photographic images and 50 hours of video footage. It conducted 34 confidential interviews including with survivors and witnesses of the 7 October attacks, released hostages, first responders and others.”

    • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes you just mentioned Zaka in there.

      And after reviewing the footage the UN found zero evidence of rape.

      • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -24 months ago

        Wrong, they “found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations, including rape and gang rape in at least three locations in southern Israel.”

        Just repeating “Zaka” over and over won’t make evidence disappear, as much as you wish it would.

          • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            They are in the UN report, so obviously you didn’t even bother reading it before dismissing it.

              • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Yes, I read it. If you think multiple eyewitnesses and photos don’t count as evidence, then you must think rape is not a real problem.

                Do you also think there is no evidence that E Jean Carroll was raped by Donald Trump?

                • @Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Jean E carrol personally said she was raped and it seems credible from the evidence. why would I not believe her?

                  Are there any israelis personally saying they were raped?

                  • @FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -1
                    edit-2
                    4 months ago

                    What evidence is there of Carroll’s rape besides an eyewitness account?

                    There are multiple eyewitness accounts of rape/murder on 10/7. Furthermore, released hostages gave firsthand accounts to the UN of rape while in captivity.

                    But you only accept eyewitness accounts when they fit your narrative. That’s why nobody should believe Hamas’ denials.