Some politicians are so fearful of former President Donald Trump retaking the White House that “they don’t really want to tell the full truth,” West said. “[Biden has] created the best economy that we can get. Is this the best that we can get? You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win,” West said in a clip played on CNN Sunday.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    [Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

    Straw man arguments like this are what makes it so obvious Cornell West is full of shit. There isn’t a single damn person who ever said that, but Cornell West wants you to think it’s a majority opinion that he’s fighting against.

    Back in the real world, we recognize Biden has taken some serious steps in the right direction regarding infrastructure investment, empowering labor, reducing student loan debt, and increasing the portion of taxes paid by the wealthy, among other things. In the real world, we recognize this is as far as he can go with a razor thin Senate majority that depends on the votes of Manchin and Sinema, and we recognize he now has a Republican House to stymy every one of his priorities.

    To get progressive policies passed, elect more Democrats to the House and Senate and reelect Joe Biden

        • DLSchichtl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ma’am, please don’t feed the troll. Just block TokenBoomer and move along. Your lemmy experience will thank you.

        • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having refuted or defeated an opponent’s proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., “stand up a straw man”) and the subsequent refutation of that false argument (“knock down a straw man”) instead of the opponent’s proposition.

          [Biden has] created the best economy that we can get…You don’t tell that lie to the people just for Biden to win

          You assume that West has created a straw man. He claims that the economy could be better. Whether it’s true or not is up to the reader. In order for it to be a straw man, it would have to be untrue. If it is true, then it is not a straw man.

          Let’s assume that his statement is true. That the economy could be better. By treating it as untrue, you create the straw man. You then proceed to refute his assertion by listing Biden’s economic accomplishments, thus tearing down the straw man you created.

          Remember, this is all dependent on whether West’s statement is true or not. If the reader thinks it true. Then it is not a straw man.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You heavily edited this after I responded, so here’s my edit. Cornell West is saying “THEY are saying this is the best economy you can get. I don’t think this is the best it can get!” The first statement, literally no one is saying that. It’s an argument he invented to argue against. It is not true. The second statement is something literally everyone agrees with. Everyone would like to be doing better financially. Cornell West made up an argument and then knocked it down with something everyone agrees with.

            • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              To be fair, I don’t think the use of the Straw Man Fallacy is appropriate concerning the economy. Because a good or bad economy is open to interpretation. But you used the term, creating a de facto “straw man.” You then refuted it. I’m not defending West or his statement. And I find it fascinating how you were able to do that. Thus, my comment.

              Edit: I am not a logician. This is just how I interpreted it.

  • EnderWi99in@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cornell West is a fraud paid for by the right wing. Please don’t fall for his bullshit. I’m glad Sanders sees it.

  • Ekybio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cornell West SHOULD know better then doing stunts like this. Because even if the criticism is correct, he is siphoning blue-voters away to a politically useless or damaging position, like the Green-Party.

    Which means he weakens the Democrats.

    Which in turn means he strengthens the Fascist-GOP.

    We can aknowledge the Truth, but always vote and always vote blue. NEVER risk a blue vote for the need to pride yourself on “fighting the corrupt system”.

    Emotional validation is never an argument for weakening the only thing holding back Fascism in the US. To much is at stake!

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ive been voting since the mid 80s and EVERY election has been ‘theres too much at stake.’

      West isnt syphoning off votes, if Biden or Democrats actually represented the public there would be no concern about him having a challenger and he would win by a landslide, but they dont represent us, they represent capital and only capital. The world is on fire and they are telling us we are ok, most of us can see things are not ok, but getting worse. And the part about splitting the vote is liberal myth, if there was no 3rd party candidate running we still wouldnt vote for the cause of most of our problems.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      if the criticism is correct, he is siphoning blue-voters away

      good. that’s the plan. how is he supposed to win the presidency without someone who previously voted democrat?

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Voting against the Democrats to get us ranked choice voting can work on a local and state level. It’s worked best when communities are mobilized and well-organized and educated about the intention to do so. For example, Democrats have tried to primary AOC multiple times.

    But voting against Biden on the federal level is taking a huge risk. The gane theory states that doing so will spoil the vote and givr Trump a better chance at winning. Don’t split the vote on the Presidential ticket.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Splitting the vote is liberal myth, we wouldnt vote for your Wall Street hand picked candidates if there was no 3rd party candidate running.

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I dont really understand why. I’m trans, not a liberal. I obviously want Biden to win - and it seems even if he is a wall street friendly liberal, he… also wants to give aome kindling to the left. The president will never be able to advocate for the working class the way unions of us can.

        • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You dont understand what, splitting the vote? Biden is not wall street friendly, hes owned by them. They call the shots in government, not its politicians.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah well for me thats not enough of a reason to vote against him. If he loses I’m in deep shit l, because I am trans.

              • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I - what? Oh wow you are quite right that Biden has done fuck all over this ‘states rights’ trans issue. But of course even nothing is better than the imminent danger that the GOP has planned.

                • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Biden and Co inaction, and his lifetime of pushing for states rights has resulted in where we are right now.

                  How long ago did the bathroom discussions start? And when was the last federal politician that even addressed the issue? When has someone thats attacked an individual or group of people in the trans community been convicted under the Matthew Shepard And James Byrd, Jr Act? They don’t care about trans, or gay, or minorities other than our ability to keep them in power, to do nothing.

                  They did the same thing with women’s reproductive rights, fucked around for 50 years and kept promising to make it law until SCOTUS said shit or get off the pot. They raised millions keeping liberals in fear over what republicans might do if we dont give money and keep them in power.

                  I have no clue how old you are, but Ive been of voting age and came out in the mid 80s and its been the same song and dance every two years, decades have gone by and that progress they keep promising is always just out of reach.

                  They don’t care.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t split the vote on the Presidential ticket.

      if democrats are worried about splitting the vote, they can vote for the green candidate, since greens obviously won’t be deterred by democrat admonishment.