It got a $200 price cut.

They can’t sell the $699 AI party trick that requires a $24 subscription so they slashed the price to $499. Unfortunately it’s still $500 too expensive for what’s worth.

Maybe at $10 someone could buy it as a Halloween costume prop and even pay a whole month of subscription just to show off the novelty

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    31·
    2 months ago

    At what price point would this device be useful? Seems like the sort of device that was made to allow the company to be bought by Google/Microsoft/Meta.

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      28·
      2 months ago

      At what price point would this device be useful?

      given that it’s horribly bad at what it claims to do and was a fire risk? not even a zero point.

        • JCPhoenix@beehaw.orgEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          Yeah that’d be cool if the opened it up and recreate it as a platform for people to mess around with it. Like a rPi or Arduino or something. Because in it’s current form…pretty much useless. But you’re right; they’d have to drop that price point significantly and incentivize people even if it were open.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      9·
      2 months ago

      It’ll probably be a brick in a few months, when the company goes bankrupt and the servers it relies on get shut down. So even getting it for free would be too expensive.

  • DdCno1@beehaw.org
    13·
    2 months ago

    Bit late, isn’t it? I had already forgotten all about it and I don’t think I’m the only one.

    • Toribor@corndog.socialEnglish
      8·
      2 months ago

      If it was free and I just had to pay the subscription I’d think “Can’t my phone already do all this?”

      • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
        8·
        2 months ago

        You phone doesn’t have the low-res laser projector gimmick that is invisible in daylight, runs extremely hot and drains the battery in one hour

        • 4grams@awful.systemsEnglish
          3·
          2 months ago

          truth be told, the only reason I would be even remotely interested in the device is the stupid laser projector. Seems like that might be fun to play with.

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            1·
            2 months ago

            Yes! I remember experiments with similar projectors and interfaces like this device going back at least as far as the early 2010s. Would be fun to mess with.

  • DavidGarcia@feddit.nl
    9·
    2 months ago

    Maybe if they make a watch with a camera cover and a laser that draws a little box around what it can see and it all runs locally, then I might be interested.

    Mainly to identify plants and mushrooms.

    Not a fan of the idea of everyone pointing AI powered cameras at me all the time, like with this weird pin or smart glasses.

    Such products should have a legally mandated camera cover, microphone shutoff and a REALLY OBVIOUS tell to everyone around you if you are using the camera or mic.

    Bonus points if it screams a really loud “PERVERT” alarm if you’re doing something creepy.

    If only that was true for smartphones too…

    • LukeZaz@beehaw.orgEnglish
      9·
      2 months ago

      Mainly to identify plants and mushrooms.

      Considering modern-day “AI” track records at this, the only thing I’d trust a device like that to do is massively increase poisoning deaths.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.comEnglish
    1·
    2 months ago

    I’ve never heard of this thing, is it supposed to do what the analyze this picture or ID the song playing features of my phone already could do, or is there something novel I’m missing?