• stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not one of the maniacs making threats of any kind, but honestly it really seems like death threats are the only thing that gets any attention anymore, so I can understand why it’s done…

      Is “eat the rich” not a death threat in its own right?

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It is, and here’s the thing: All of society, laws, and legal recourses ultimately just boil down to “might makes right, but with extra steps.” We all love to act like this isn’t the case in a civilized society, but it is. That might usually rests with the police, the military, some governmental organization, or some megacorporation. Violence both literal and metaphorical is inflicted on the common person continually by those at the top. Who are the police after all? Just guys with guns. Who are judges and politicians? Just guys with access to the police. Who are megacorporations? Just guys with access to judges and politicians, and so on down the line. So when someone says they have the law on their side, and you don’t, what they’re really implying is that they can call the guys with guns, who if you don’t do what they say (no matter how ridiculous) can literally kill you. And we treat this as normal and proper and reasonable, because we’re stupid.

        These motherfuckers want to act like their violence or threat of violence is justified, and that’s a one way street.

        Well, it ain’t. Nobody’s invulnerable.

        Maybe it’s “just” video games. (Or “just” a cell phone app, or “just” a predatory subscription, or “just” an apartment with exorbitant rent, or whatever.) But big corporations are fucking with people’s livelihoods, here. There’s a reason we colloquially call such a thing “a living.” These are assholes taking food off of someone’s table, just for greed, just because they can, because they think they’ve above reproach. Because the whole teetering facade is lopsided. It doesn’t matter who the fuck they are at that point.

        • Korkki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, this is basically why I’m not buying these arguments against a struggle of any kind, just because methods of it are illegal.

          Illegality =/= your cause or methods are wrong

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Call me whatever you want but Im happy the people who make these bad decisions from their insulated lots in life have to face at least some kind of consequences now, because the law is explicitly set up so that they typically never have to. Sucks that it comes to this but its behavior analysis 101, if you dont introduce consequences for undesirable behaviors, you’d be an idiot to expect change.

          I don’t love that it’s probably caught up a lot of people who have nothing or little to do with it though, but the guys at the top need consequences or nothing will change, and beggars cant be choosers.

      • zaph@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is “eat the rich” not a death threat in its own right?

        Maybe it is but I always took it as “let’s take their money and redistribute the wealth.”

        • MarigoldPuppyFlavors@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no meaningful difference between a threat and a warning. I’ve never understood why we see that retort so often when someone asks “is that a threat?!”. It’s the same damn thing.

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Threat in criminal sense requires that subject of the threat is identifiable…

            Who is the rich in that “threat” above?

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Death threats are not OK, but this can destroy years of work for people, and it can threaten their livelihood. I’m guessing this has pushed some people into a sense of desperation. And these threats are acts of desperation, not threats that have a huge chance of being carried out.

      John Riccitiello needs to be fired, if he isn’t Unity deserves bankruptcy for this move.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would they do that? They are not directly impacted by this. Developers losing years of work have much more reason to be super angry.

          • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ever been in a game forum where the players pretty much worship the developers as if they were gods? It’s way too common. Those people can get crazy protective when they make it part of their identity.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nope, but I can imagine that to some degree.

              Despite that, I doubt gamers are very involved in payment methods of game engines, or even know which game engine their games are running on.

              So unless some VERY popular game developers have been out saying expansions for their favorite games will not be released because of this, I don’t see the mechanics for what you claim working at this point.

    • CriticalMiss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s just edgy teens saying that they’re gonna go murder them, it’s not really going to happen but they have to take safety precautions

        • sadreality@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, these people would need to be real for the jail haha

          People making up false crime deff should go to jail