Summary

The White House has directed the State and Treasury Departments to draft a proposal for lifting some U.S. sanctions on Russia as part of Trump’s effort to restore ties and end the Ukraine war.

The proposal could ease restrictions on select Russian entities and oligarchs, though it’s unclear what the U.S. would receive in return.

Trump has signaled openness to sanctions relief despite previously threatening harsher measures.

Talks between U.S. and Russian officials have intensified, with economic cooperation, including rare earth minerals, emerging as a key topic.

      • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Just wait. In fucking Russia, civilians are not allowed to own an AK-47, AKM or any military based rifle. To take complete power, Krasnov will need to stomp on 2A.

        • djsp@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think Trumpism does not need to take away guns thanks to the correlation between Trumpism and gun ownership. Why would they disarm those who support them and carry out their wishes with a degree of plausible deniability, as in January 6th?

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            Given how things are going a fair number then probably won’t be card carrying Trump supporters for much longer. They’re already pretty pissed off with him.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Because ultimately, those armed MAGA people’s faces are just too delicious for the leopards to resist. There’s already been discontent that they aren’t seeing the improvements they wanted, and some of them directly getting screwed by Trump and Musk.

    • SomeChick@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      22 hours ago

      About 30 percent of Americans are treasonous cunts and the others have no idea what’s happening

    • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      The moron that tried used an AR-15 which shoots a tiny little bullet and not the appropriate calibre. If he had known anything about ballistics we wouldn’t be dealing with this.

        • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Just because it is in range doesn’t mean it’s appropriate

          It was the wrong calibre for what he was doing. The wrong platform for his objective.

          I can but 4” clay pigeons at 50m with a 9mm pistol but I should use something else.

          • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Idk man it was less than 200 yards. The military does qualifications out to 500 with the same caliber. Right after it happened every journalist was out there saying it was an impossible shot, which it wouldn’t be for a reasonably skilled shooter. If you look it up most folks are saying 5.56 is effective out to 600 and a skilled shooter can group at 1,000 or more.

            Idk why I’m arguing about this the kid was a useless shithead, just wish he’d done better I suppose.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That’s what you get with a bad education system.

        I was taught how to consider bullet velocity and trajectory by the government when I was 20.

        • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You probably also were taught to use at least a 30 calibre bullet like the M21 (which is what the Secret Service used to return fire)

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I wasn’t being trained as an assassin.

            Choosing the calibre wouldn’t be my prerogative.

            What we were shooting with was just 7.62. Which now that I check equates to a .30cal actually. Never knew that, huh.

            I did handle some .50cals, but not a sniper rifle, and I don’t know how sneaky I could be with a tripod mounted .50cal AA machine gun.

            Tldr basic conscription but I did go the longer way voluntarily and am an NCO. I just recalled some basic ballistics lectures from your comment.

            • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              The AR bullet is less than one third the weight and much smaller than the 7.62 round which is why I said it was a shitty choice (and specifically why we still use Korea era armament to this day in the M 21, and 60, mini gun etc (NATO 7.62).

              NATO 5.56 Is for ground troops and is designed more to incapacitate

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                7.62 and 5.56 is basically just a choice.

                Thats what made us Finns joining NATO so hard (as in a side from all the politics and just practical matters), because we use 7.62 for all ground troops, especially because Russia uses it as well and wed like to be able to scavenge their ammo if they try any special military operations this way.

                We’ve fucking tons of our own make of a AK variant, the RK. RK62 is decent but the sights are shit, RK95TP is awesome. That was my main weapon, had to keep a -62 for 2 months when I was in a poorer regiment for trainining. (Their boots sucked as well everyone from our brigade got a permit from the doc to wear holiday boots for normal service because they were just so much more comfy, like walking on air vs walking in glass.)

                • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  That 7.62 is not the same as NATO 7.62. The AK round has the diameter but not the length, weight or amount of gunpowder.

                  You are right that it doesn’t matter that much compared to 5.56, for a battle rifle, but NATO 7.62 is much more powerful and weighs a shitload more. It’s what I use to shoot 700m (and as I said above what US special forces still use as the standard sniper rifle M21)

                  Russia has been using 5.45 since the 70s (The ones with the brown magazine instead of black). I know the Czech SAR models were available in 5.56x45, 5.45x56, and 7.62x39 (NATO is 7.62x51)

                  • Dasus@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    20 hours ago

                    You mean our RK 7.62 or the weird Russian 7.62?

                    I don’t know that much about bullets tbh, it’s been closer to 20 years since I was in the army. I do remberer practicing the operation and dismantling and reassembly of the most commonly used Russian 7.62 machine gun(can’t remember named model whatever but I do remberer the sequence) and that cartridge was way bigger and kinda clunky but still a 7.62 bullet

                    Edit wait idk that its the most common but was common enough for us to train against

            • Fluke@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              You don’t have to be sneaky, just not fucking miss like the gormless cretin that last tried.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                I mean, if you’re not sneaky and you’re setting up a .50cal turret where they’re holding a speech from POTUS, I’m pretty sure someone would have some notes on that.

                I mean I’m Finnish, not American and I do understand American gun culture is pretty liberal, but is it that liberal?

                Edit but oh boy would I fucking love to open up on that cunt on a stage. CHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOKCHOK

              • MisanthropiCynic@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                But he missed because the bullet he used was too small and too light and didn’t have a proper ballistic trajectory

                • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  5.56 effective range out of a 16" barrel is 500 yards. Trump was a mere 400 feet from Crooks.

                  “Brandon Webb, a former Navy SEAL and the former head instructor of the SEAL Sniper course, said a well-trained shooter could shoot very accurately with an AR-15 at the distance at which Crooks shot Trump, especially with a magnified optic such as an ACOG sight.”

                  Dude missed. The weapon and projectile are more than capable of delivering an accurate and lethal hit at that distance.

                  TL: DR, Skill issue.

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Doesn’t work when the target is wearing discreet body armor, and the impact has to be instantly lethal. Trump isn’t, going to bleed out (they pre-deploy emergency services to large events) Even a lung hit isn’t going to kill fast enough. So center mass become “pretty much heart only”.

          Shooting for the head and neck is pretty much the only option in that scenario.