• lazycat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ghostty is fast? It takes like 2 full seconds to open and I’m not even exaggerating. Kitty, Alacritty and foot take only a few microseconds to launch. I feel the same in regards to Alacritty, I’d use it as default if it had image support. For now I’m using foot.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Something wrong there, Ghostty is just as quick for me. Are you using an older PC?

      Both load for me in milliseconds, even with fastfetch stuck in my startup.

      • lazycat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Don’t know about old but definitely not slow. My PC has a ryzen 5 3600 and RTX 3060. All terminals have a fast startup time except for Ghostty.

        • tankplanker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          ryzen 5 3600

          Yeah thats what I would call old now, lol.

          There is 100% something wrong with your Ghostty.

          Heres a shitty gif I made to show you how fast Ghostty, Alacritty and Konsole is on my PC, all way less than a second and I am running a ton of background crap including different 4k animated wallpapers. Gif

            • tankplanker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Its six years old, that’s starting to get on a bit now for a processor that was never anywhere near top of the line from AMD when it was new.

              I think if you are trying to bling our your desktop and not expecting it to impact performance from an older, less powerful setup then generally speaking you are going to have a bad time. You should be pitching your desktop experience based on what your hardware can handle, there are plenty of terminal options available depending on what you need, just like there are plenty of WM/DMs if you have a lower spec machine.

              Having said that, it was pretty damn obvious that there something wrong with ghostty on their setup, and its misleading to say that ghostly is just bad because of that.

              • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                expecting it to impact performance from an older, less powerful setup then generally speaking you are going to have a bad time

                It’s a terminal. If it’s not good enough for 3600 maybe it’s just not good. I don’t have 3600 btw.

                Probably, it might be a on off issue.

                • tankplanker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Ive said repeatedly that its certain to be an issue with their setup I have even provided proof that its not typical.

                  Its just a terminal applies to pretty much every type of application. There are lightweight WM, text editors, terminals, etc. etc. for a reason.

                  I can run my current setup with its 2 different animated 4k wallpapers and all the over shit I have running on my old 4800u that is only slightly slower and it consumes an insane amount of CPU at idle. Just because you can does not mean you should.