• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    We’re sorry to see you disapproval of corporate capitalism. Please take 1 hour of your day to send us some feedback so we can improve.

    First, just download our UMata app from the app store, by reading this message you have already agreed to our terms of surveillance. Once the UMata app is installed on your device, it will be granted kernel level access so it can periodically extract biometric identifiers like facial and iris scans in the background without you needing to do anything. After verifying your facial scan against our database of government identities, the UMata app will generate a unique URL for you to take a “totally anonymous”™ survey.

    Once at the survey page, you just need to enable JavaScript, disable adblocker, accept our cookies and solve a simple CAPTCHA identifying any homeless people. If the UMata app was somehow not able to record you breathing for your biometric signature to our licensing agreement, you will be asked to breathe harder.

    We are excited to hear back from you!

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, the people who are somehow getting the message that Louis Rossmann was praising Microsoft either didn’t watch the video or generally struggle with nuance, or both.

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s not irrelevant. Using a corporate mascot as a symbol against another corporate mascot/product isn’t going to spread the message Louis intended. You argue the people complaining about it aren’t getting his point, but do you really think it will/has survived the word-of-mouth spreading it? The game of telephone that viral trends like this follow is lightning fast and warps messages in extreme ways. And it’s not much of a stretch to assume that, if MS churned out a new Clippy chatbot, people would rally around it to spite the others since they have no understanding of why they were doing it in the first place.

        *Also, people already mischaracterize the sincerity of early tech giants. I’ve certainly seen many people lament “the good Internet” of the mid 2000s, as if the very issues we have today weren’t percolating back then. None of those companies were ever good or harmless, the idea that them or their products are “different” now is naive, and relying on that naivety to push for change is a mistake.

    • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s also not explicitly not about them either. Kinda the problem with symbols is that they’re marred by association. This movement is ultimately symbolic and the Clippy people (Microsoft) are at the heart of everything this symbolic gesture goes against.

      It would be like me trying to make a symbol of how cars are bad by simply showing an old one.

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Is this the anti rosman propaganda kicking in

    Ofcorse its true. The point is it couldn’t and it possed us off enough they removed it