Striker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoPavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down19
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imagePavlov's conditioninglemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareKellamity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 year agoPavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time) What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva) Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning. Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·1 year agoPlease Please Please Get a Life Foundation
minus-squarePipedLinkBotBlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoHere is an alternative Piped link(s): Please Please Please Get a Life Foundation Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube. I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
Pavlov’s dog is not notable for showing that dogs could be conditioned (bell = food time)
What it did was show that a conditional response (bell = food time) could cause a reflexive response (saliva)
Classical conditioning is not the same as associative learning.
Pavlov’s dog is not about associating Thing A with Thing B - that didn’t need a russian scientist to prove.
Please Please Please Get a Life Foundation
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Please Please Please Get a Life Foundation
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.