• UFO@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good article but they didn’t need the sensationalist title. “often” implies >50% in common discourse. The cited rate is 14.8%. terrible, but not often. Downvoted, unfortunately.

    Edit: as comments below, and some searching online: “often” is subjective. So no, does not imply “>50% in common discourse”

    • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wouldn’t say ‘often’ implies >50%, to imply that I would use something like ‘mostly’ or ‘generally’. I think if you think about a 15% failure rate in something else, for example starting a car, saying it often fails would be pretty apt.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Context matters, 15% failure rate for a weaopon is certainly often. Furthermore, what that means in the context of cluster munitions is that they just sit there long after the conflict is over, so when people stumble on them decades later they get maimed and killed.

      This is currently happening in places like Vietnam that were subjected to these horrors by US. Now it’s going to be the turn for the people of Ukraine.

      Any pretenses that US actually cares about the people of that country have now been dropped.

    • purahna@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      One in six fails to detonate in a cluster munition that has around a hundred grenades? Holy fuck that’s fifteen unexploded grenades on a former battlefield every time they fire the weapon, I was previously against cluster munitions and I was just assuming it was like a 1% failure rate.