@valentino@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • edit-210 months agoLinux Desktop Market share keeps increasing, 3.19% now. +0.07% for August gs.statcounter.commessage-square164fedilinkarrow-up1848arrow-down122file-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1826arrow-down1external-linkLinux Desktop Market share keeps increasing, 3.19% now. +0.07% for August gs.statcounter.com@valentino@lemmy.ml to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • edit-210 months agomessage-square164fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: linux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.ml
minus-square@duncesplayed@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglish103•10 months agoJust an FYI that at this rate it’s only going to take another 115 years before Linux has 100% market share.
minus-square@ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.publinkfedilink26•10 months agoWhat if S-curve instead of linear rate?
minus-square@duncesplayed@lemmy.onelinkfedilink48•10 months agoYou mean Linux isn’t going to have 200% market share one day? Shit, I’m starting to think my calculations may have not been totally serious.
minus-square@Declamatie@mander.xyzlinkfedilink1•10 months agoEntirely possible if the population dubbles
minus-square@MonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilink20•edit-210 months agoMarket share is usually a curve.
minus-square@selokichtli@lemmy.mllinkfedilink13•edit-210 months agoThis is the same logic that a right wing ex-president of my country used to criticize the current leftist president while talking about the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
minus-square@valentino@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilink10•10 months agoThat’s for August. And the growth is exponential, not linear.
minus-square@mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish5•10 months agoTo a point. Let’s be honest it’s going to be more like an S-curve since you can’t go past 100% market share, and some people will refuse to switch. And people not wanting to switch is fine imo. Having competition will likely help all OS’s get better over time
minus-square@Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink1•10 months agoi mean i’d prefer the competition to be BSD and such, not windows and macos
minus-square@priapus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish1•10 months agoWhy would market share increase linearly?
Just an FYI that at this rate it’s only going to take another 115 years before Linux has 100% market share.
2138 is the year of the Linux desktop!
What if S-curve instead of linear rate?
You mean Linux isn’t going to have 200% market share one day? Shit, I’m starting to think my calculations may have not been totally serious.
I get that, I just like math
Entirely possible if the population dubbles
Market share is usually a curve.
2138, year of the Linux desktop.
Exacting 100years after y2k38
This is the same logic that a right wing ex-president of my country used to criticize the current leftist president while talking about the COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
That’s for August. And the growth is exponential, not linear.
To a point. Let’s be honest it’s going to be more like an S-curve since you can’t go past 100% market share, and some people will refuse to switch.
And people not wanting to switch is fine imo. Having competition will likely help all OS’s get better over time
i mean i’d prefer the competition to be BSD and such, not windows and macos
That’s fine, there’s no rush.
Why would market share increase linearly?