• Chainweasel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    231
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    A decade ago, It was predicted that we would hit 1.5°C between 2050-2060, and even as recently as 2 years ago the prediction had moved forward to between 2030-2040.
    The next decade or two are going to be very… interesting

    • @alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The IPCC calculations were always criticized for being overly optimistic. Anyone following this debate knew that we would hit 1.5 C sooner rather than later.

      We are definitely going to hit 3 degrees in our lifetime, once the melting tundras release their methane store.

      • Kale
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3610 months ago

        Melting tundra releases methane, accelerating the increase in temperature. Rising temperature reduces polar ice, making oceans absorb more heat, accelerating heating. Climate pattern changes cause more frequent and larger wildfires, accelerating heating.

        There are probably processes that work to reduce heating as it increases that I’m not aware of, but there are a lot of positive feedback processes which is concerning.

        I believe the IPCC 1.5C was criticized because it included effects of a carbon sequestering process that hasn’t been invented yet. That’s pretty optimistic.

        • @Graphine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Which is why I support the idea of setting up bases on the Moon and/or Mars.

          Everything is accelerating, and nobody gives a fuck to do anything before it’s too late. I hate the argument that NASA doesn’t push its budget to prevent CC or even Space X. Because stopping CC is a global effort on a colossal scale. It’s not going to work until it’s too late. Might as well get off this rock.

          Edit: Very fucking optimistic of you all

          • @frenchtoast@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            810 months ago

            Ignore them. They’re so hopelessly black-pilled, they’re not likely to support any significant course of action.

            We’re gonna have to kickstart human expansion into space to not only save ourselves from climate collapse but also what’s left of the biosphere. You’re not wrong at all.

          • @floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -7
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            If we can’t make Earth livable we certainly can’t make the Moon or Mars livable. At best it will be a handful of people living miserably for a short time. “Get off this rock” just isn’t a realistic option, and we don’t have the time to make it so.

        • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          There are probably processes that work to reduce heating as it increases

          Nuclear war, for one. In a more naturalistic vein, asteroid strike or massive volcanic eruptions. People worried about climate change just refuse to look on the bright side.

    • @ruford1976@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      what’s worse is that it’s actually 1.6 C

      it says in the article here

      Data released last week from Copernicus, a branch of the European Union Space Programme, shows August was 1.59C warmer than 1850–1900 levels, following a 1.6C increase in July.

      • @rallatsc@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2910 months ago

        Yes but only for a couple of months, averaged over the whole year it’s significantly lower than that. Probably still on track to hit the annual average of 1.5 sometime in the next 10-20 years. Still definitely a dire situation but not entirely out of left field based on the recent estimates.

        The recent records have now lifted the year-to-date global temperature to the end of August to 1.35C above pre-industrial levels, just 0.01C behind 2016 — the current record holder

        • @ruford1976@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          i had my doubts. i was questioning the lack of coverage of this news.

          regardless there is still good reason to be concerned.

      • @Sylver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4110 months ago

        Yeah, it’s honestly horrifying to see the lack of reaction around the world. If you live anywhere near the coast, you better get the fuck out or tell your kids to.

        • @Serinus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’m already telling people to get out of Florida*. I expect multiple Katrina-level events over the next 15 years. “Florida refugees” is going to become a common phrase.

          Orlando might be more likely to survive than Miami or Tampa, but do you really want to be in the city surrounded by devastation?

          We, as humans, seem to have lost the ability to plan more than 20 years into the future. Florida is still building in areas that are going to be crushed, and the only reaction is from insurance companies.

          We’re not trying to prevent it. We’re not building any kind of defenses or contingency plans. We’re not encouraging people to move out. We’re not preventing people from moving in. In fact, we’re building new and encouraging people to move IN to Florida. It’s full on head in sand.

            • @Dkarma@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              310 months ago

              Look at the percentage of these purchases that are foreign investors making cash offers and I think u start to see why the insurance companies leaving isn’t having the effect it should.

          • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            If that massive icesheet in Antarctica gives way, Florida will be under water.

            At the rate we’re going, I think it will take a cataclysm of that level before people will realize how important this thing is.

          • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Man I have like 5 family members and friends just move to Florida. They were tired of the high taxes and politics of California. At least they won’t burn in a wildfire though!

            • @vivadanang@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              I wonder if FL is attracting a certain type of moths to a flame… recently had a neighbor move to clearwater

        • @Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -210 months ago

          It’s nice by the coast though, I’d just put aquatic pilings under my house and have a ruggedised shelter built into it. Even if I live to a hundred and fifty with all the ice melted my land will still be under less water than the intercoastal platforms we’ve been routinely building since world war one.

    • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      810 months ago

      Supposedly the new stringent heavy shipping emissions controls are having an impact on the greenhouse effect. Reduction of sulfur dioxide which had a reverse greenhouse effect is warming the oceans up more.

      “Carbon Brief analysis shows that the likely side-effect of the 2020 regulations to cut air pollution from shipping is to increase global temperatures by around 0.05C by 2050. This is equivalent to approximately two additional years of emissions.”

      https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-low-sulphur-shipping-rules-are-affecting-global-warming/#:~:text=Global emissions of sulphur dioxide,warming coming from greenhouse gases.

      So this may be our first example of the threats of NOT enacting terraforming for climate change will have.

      • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        It proves that creating cloud cover will impact ocean temperature. There are methods of doing this without creating acid rain. Just spray ocean water as a fine mist into the air and you should get some nice fluffy clouds. We have the capability to cover entire oceans in cloud cover to mitigate global warming.

        Obviously this would have some unpredictable impacts on weather patterns, but we’re already dealing with that no matter what we do. We’re at a point where we’re desperate enough to try some crazy schemes like this.

        • @PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          After September 11th and the COVID lockdowns, scientists noted an increase in global surface temperature due to the absence of contrails. So yes, this is actually something we are already doing!

          Sulfur dioxide however is an even more effective reflector of sunlight compared to water vapor. And don’t forget, water vapor is itself a very greenhouse agent that contributes toward planetary heating.

    • @ByteWizard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5310 months ago

      They’ve been saying that literally since the 60’s?

      Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand they’re still wrong.