• @giacomo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3410 months ago

    Haven’t they heard of the american method? Don’t they know the cure for X is more X?

    We just need to add some more global warming and that will solve global warming!

    Or is that just applicable to guns and debt?

    • @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Nah - it’ll just pivot to “Well it’s too late now - no reason to hold back”.

      I genuinely wonder why eco-terrorism isn’t already a meaningful “problem” - I don’t mean “some protestors blocked a road for a couple of hours or flinged some paint and soup around” - I mean “You’re working to kill all known life in the universe, and we’re doing whatever it takes to stop you.”

      • @sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1110 months ago

        There’s no one funding it. If some of the billionaires can direct their money to make renewables adopted in the mainstream we can be in a much better place now. But, you know to have that amount of money the switch that also governs your care for the environment gets switched off too.

        • @sinedpick@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The problem is far worse than what any single billionaire can fix. Billions of dollars are being poured into renewable energy infrastructure. It’s just that while this is happening, we’re also emitting the same amount of CO2 as always. The only long-term resolution of this is de-growth.

        • @WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          Explosives and rifles aren’t expensive. There’s a reason the best funded military in the world consistently gets slowed up by insurgents.

          While big funding would certainly help, this is more an issue of motivation (which expensive media campaigns would certainly help).

          I’m not advocating for any of this, but as long as innocents weren’t caught up in it, I wouldn’t lose a wink of sleep over it either.

      • The Menemen!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        810 months ago

        Hm? The homeopathic approach to climate change would be to dissolve a tree in 100,000m³ of alcohol, pour that into the ocean and wait for results.

        • @dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          Homeopathic processes aim at curing by introducing a very low concentration of the disease, so effectively curing x by adding x. I think your example would make sense if it was oil or CO2 instead of a tree.

          • The Menemen!
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Burning a tree also sets free a lot of CO2. :) Heating with wood is not sustainable at all, unlike some lobbyist made us beliveve.

            But yeah, oil would have been the more obvious example.

      • @InputZero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        I am so glad that garbage uses homeopathic rather than holistic these days. You want a doctor that takes a holistic approach, they’re looking at your whole body not just their specialty. Homeopathic =/= holistic.