• @regrub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1635 months ago

    Most high-quality LiPo-powered devices already do this at the hardware-level. The 100% level you see on the software is usually 80% actual charge on the battery.

    • @hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      It’s a pity they don’t offer the option to ‘supercharge’ to 100, so you get extended battery life when desired, when you know you will need it. Say, going camping, or plan to use the phone a lot for whatever reason.

    • OtterOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 months ago

      Yea that’s what I’ve heard, and I personally keep stuff plugged in

      It was a recent article by iFixit, so I thought I’d share it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • @Lojcs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Isn’t the charge limit of the battery arbitrary? The manufacturer can set whatever target voltage they want , so it’s meaningless to say they limit the battery to 80% when they decide what 100% is.

    • @oktoberpaard@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      I don’t doubt the fact that they take some margin to extend the lifetime of the battery, but if we take iPhones as an example, they:

      • charge at a slower rate when nearing 100%
      • try to postpone charging the final 20% until the last moment before disconnecting from the wall outlet
      • can be software capped at 80% by the user (in newer models)

      This makes me suspect that that the margin between what’s reported in software as 100% and the actual capacity of the battery is less than 20%. This also makes sense from the standpoint of the consumer expecting a long battery life on their expensive high-end device, putting pressure on the companies to make the margin smaller and the charging algorithms smarter. Just my observations, of course.