…with the James Web Telescope looking for sources of artificial light to identify potential intelligent life, and the news this week of Perseverance searching for microbial life on Mars it feels like we are getting closer to a major discovery. But what - if anything - would it mean for the religions on Earth if life is proven to exist out there?

  • ModdedPhones@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Same as every other times when science have disproven religions fairytales. They adapt. God also made those lifeforms

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So, fun fact, St Augustine, who is considered one of the Church Fathers, explicitly argued that if the ‘Antipodes’ (i.e., southern continents not connected to Europe, Asia or Africa) actually existed and had humans living there, that would prove the Gospel was untrue.

    The reason for this is as follows: Christians of his era believed that the reason God had allowed the Romans to destroy the Second Temple and push the Jews into exile was to prepare the men of all nations (as understood at the time) for the coming of the Gospel. The idea was that the Jews had taken the Old Testament, and the prophecies of the Messiah therein, across the whole world. Augustine argues that if the Antipodes contained human beings who had never had any kind of contact with Jews, and therefore no contact with the OT, and no contact with Christians, and therefore no contact with the New Testament, either, that must mean the Gospels are false. Why? Because there’s no conceivable reason that a just God would have deprived entire civilisations of the chance of redemption.

    Of course, we now know that at the time Augustine was writing (4th-5th century AD), there were literally millions of people who had never had the slightest contact with the Jews or Christians and, furthermore, wouldn’t do so for another millennium. So, per Augustine’s argument, all those millions were condemned to Hell (the concept of Purgatory didn’t exist at this point, but condemning them all to no chance of Heaven, just because they were unfortunate to be born a long way away from Jersualem, is clearly also unjust). Either God is incredibly unjust and unmerciful, which means the Gospels are untrue, OR the Good News wasn’t actually spread to all men, which must also mean that they’re not true.

    The upshot of this is that one of the Church Fathers has, in retrospect, irrefutably argued that the Gospels are untrue. The amount of special pleading required to make out that, actually, the Maori or the Easter Islanders or [insert any other uncontacted peoples here] had an opportunity to accept Christ and somehow missed it entirely is far beyond any sane interpretation of the evidence.

    Now, as you might have noticed, this hasn’t stopped people from believing in the Gospels. I don’t see why the discovery of life on another world would dislodge people from a belief that is transparently false when nothing else has.

    • june@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I remember being taught that Jesus presented himself to the rest of the world after his resurrection and that beyond that ‘the rocks testify’ and that all man is without excuse.

      It always bothered me, even before I began deconstructing, and was one of a few things that never set well with me.

      I’m surprised that in all my study of Augustine I never saw this about him before.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I always kind of respected the Mormons for at least trying to reconcile the existence of the Native Americans with the New Testament, beyond ‘the rocks testify’, but they also inadvertently showed how absurd the whole idea was by stretching every kind of evidence (biblical, linguistic, genetic, archaeological, etc.) so much to make it work! And of course even that didn’t seem to account for the Polynesians and… well, everyone else.

        I was always especially fond of the idea that Jesus revealed himself to the Aztecs and they somehow got so confused that they ended up worshipping a giant feathered snake instead.

  • Chadarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will proof of aliens change the brainwashed ultra religious? Not a chance. Hell, there are flatearthers and election deniers. I don’t expect much from about 30% of our population.

  • MrFlamey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Religions are unlikely to change substantially, I imagine they’ll just find some way to explain the existence of aliens that fits their existing scriptures and world view.

    There will be new religions that pop up as a result though, for sure.

    • TawdryPorker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I look forward to the aliens response being something along the lines of, “You’re God’s best boys and girls, yes you are, who are blessed little ape-beings? You are, yes all of you.”

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They would just claim god created them, too. They already did this with the universe when the whole thing about there being other stuff than the earth came up.

      • rumbleran@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly this. I know a guy who is a Christian but also believes in extraterrastial life saying that ayy lmaos are also Gods children. Every time he talks about it my head starts to spin.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right, but you also need the whole “we were saved by Jesus” or “we were God’s chosen people” or whatever from the various religions. You have to maintain that by saying there may be aliens, but we’re the ones that God favors.

        • curiosityLynx@kglitch.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not necessarily. Alternatively:

          • You can say that we’re the only ones who needed saving.
          • You can claim they’re angels or demons (if they’re older than humanity)
  • eldopgergan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Religion would change if religious people learn to look beyond 6 feet in front of them, but I guess that’s less possible than proof of extraterrestrial life.

    • curiosityLynx@kglitch.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all religious people are the Westborough Baptists, rabid creationists, prosperity gospel followers and massive hypocrites you know personally. Nor are the rest all militant fundamentalists who think terrorism is a good idea.

      There are Jains, parts of the Salvation Army and many more that are perfectly reasonable and don’t go against anything science has to say. Because at the end of the day, religions and science have very little overlap, as most religious beliefs can neither be proven nor disproven.

      • eldopgergan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree and disagree as well.

        Religion as it is refers to a way of life. Ideally what your way of life is should not change with what others do or not do.

        But realistically, what we have seen is that religion lets people justify their own shortcomings just because they are part of a secret group and then force their “way of life” on others.

        At the same time, holding onto a single “way of life” is intrinsically prone to mistakes, since we are never given complete knowledge about everything and will never have it. We need to change constantly to be better versions of ourselves.

        If there are people who believe in something greater than them, and are prepared to change if they have the necessary proof, then I’m afraid I can’t call them religious. I’d call them spiritual.

  • Brochetudo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just meeting another person who didn’t automatically believe in your allegedly true God unless you told him about it should have put religion to rest forever.

    Moreover, it’s almost funny how thousands of cultures who had no contact between them at all have imagery of red devils with bad intentions yet nobody manages to have even a similar idea of what our supposed God is.

  • Religion will just claim God made aliens, too.

    Or that they’re a test for the faithful. The way some do about dinosaur fossils.

    I am also fully convinced that religious people could scientifically discover God and not believe it’s actually God, so…

    • loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve already seen religious people mixing christianity with ancient alien theory, claiming the aliens are really fallen angels, demons or nephilim, some woukd probably persist in this

  • Naz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recall reading or hearing a rumour that the Vatican had a sealed scroll somewhere which is “to be opened in the event of positive extraterrestrial contact or proof”.

    Given secrets of that type don’t often stay secret, it amounts to something like: “God made all life and the creator is in all living creatures” (handwaving).

    In other words, the major religions already have their shit prepared.

  • NotNotNathan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    With new worlds to deliver The Word to? Nah they wouldn’t change, but they’d get serious about space travel.

  • fische_stix@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nothing. As long as people are scared of dying and other people are willing to profit from it, religion has a home