• enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    I wonder if this has anything to do with Intel’s big snafu with gen 13/14 processors. If the solution was to push a microcode update cuts the voltage to the CPUs, it’s basically a “stealth” nerf. Their spin doctors have been working overtime to frame this as erroneously high voltages that were being “fixed”.

    I’d really like to see this graph divided between Intel and AMD.

  • gex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    It could just be noisy data, it’s comparing 365 days of 2024 with ~40 days of 2025

    From their website:

    The first few days or weeks of a new year are less accurate compared to the end of a year.

  • realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    It may have to do with spending more of the die on NPU and GPU features? Some of these new integrated processors have massive GPU cores on them.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        What? No. Instead we would be able to see steady increases of say 10 % per year as a straight line instead of this, where it appears to be ever larger increases and the first ones essentially invisible.