• Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux loads the gtk libs when your desktop starts because it’s a major component of gnu/gnome. Windows doesn’t until you launch an app that would use it. It’s not a small library.

    • heeplr@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a small library.

      it’s featherweight compared to Windows Desktop, tho

      • Album@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure… But the point is that it’s an apples to oranges compare when half of gimp is loaded by the OS at boot under Linux and at runtime on Windows.

      • Album@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t use KDE any more so I don’t follow closely. But it used to be significantly slower. I recall some years back they were working to change KDE loading of gtk libs but I’m not sure what came out of that

    • pilaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But GIMP uses GTK 2 (unless you’re using the 3.0 beta), while GNOME and most other GTK-based DEs use GTK 3 (or maybe 4 now?), so the OS still has to load GTK 2 for GIMP on a cold run.

      • Album@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You need to have libgtk installed to run gimp. It would be like running a Qt app (what KDE environment and apps are based on, among other apps like OBS, roblox, google earth, virtual box, etc) without libQt. You couldn’t because the dependencies aren’t installed.

        Of course nothing is stopping you from running both, except maybe memory limitations on low ram hardware.

        Or you don’t install it as you suggest and use alternative apps.

  • donuts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything loads slower on Windows. I’ve run programs through fucking Wine that still load faster than they do on Windows.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, so are people going to claim that the start-up speed is the problem with GIMP on Windows and not the god awful UI? This is the problem with the Linux crowd. You guys write software to write software and not because you are a user of that software. A clunky UI - which is far, far too common on open source applications - will cost someone a heck of a lot more than a few seconds in getting work done.

    • OtakuAltair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s alot of irritation and bad general assumptions here lol. Krita, vlc, firefox, kdenlive etc exist and are amazing.

      Gimp’s ui is pretty bad though imo, even if it’s good enough. I’d pirate and use photoshop as it is now if I could.

    • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is it a bad UI? Or is it a case of “I know where this thing is in Photoshop. Why isn’t it in the same place in GIMP?”

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I have heard some good things about newer versions of Blender, but I haven’t had the project to give me a chance to try it out yet. But the original UI of Blender were soooo bad that my expectations are not super high. Blender is a piece of software that makes me especially sad because it is indeed a VERY powerful piece of software, and I despise Autodesk so much (who has a monopolyu in that industry) that I would LOVE to see Blender be more friendly.

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, Blender UI is so terrible, that people were asking to make separate library, so Blender’s UI could be used by other projects. SARCASM.

      • Tippon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s an awful UI. Last time I tried to use it, it took a while to find where the layers menu was. I don’t think I found how to make a brightness / contrast layer before I gave up and booted back to Windows and Photoshop.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      wait people are supposed to use GIMP I think it was for that special level of hell for graphic designers

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently it depends on who you ask in here… some think that people should just use it and be grateful for having it because it’s free! Others claim that it was never aimed at being a useful tool - mission accomplished, I guess! Congrats? Others think it’s a perfectly fine piece of software because they’ve never edited photos for a living or done any graphic design work but it checks off feature boxes, so it must be good.

        This is all so indicative of the whole open source software community. Arrogant developers who think that just because they wrote a piece of code, the public should lavish them with praise regardless of how useless that software should be. I did a thing, so honor me!1!!

    • deejaythedj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I tried to use GIMP when my PS sub ran out and I NEEDED to get some pics edited. Good GOD it took me way too long to get used to the workspace. Workflow was cut ion half, I guess that’s a thing with any new program but it took me like maybe a minute to figure out Darktable when I switched from LR.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I totally hear you. This is what far too many of these open source projects don’t get. Software needs to be usable. Fast code means squat if you are a user and you are pulling your hair out because the software forces you to work a way that is not intuitive.

        • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The developers of free software will never beg you to use their software, that’s what companies with commercial software do.
          They surely try to appeal to a certain userbase so they also ask for feedback, bug reports, testing and also contributions, translations because they aren’t working for you, they are working with you. Your phrases sound kind of entitled, like there’s someone that ows you better software, but there’s no one to complain to except to those who tell you that GIMP/any software is totally fine for everyone without knowing your specific use case. Developers of free software are anyone with any skillset who will try their best, but it doesn’t mean they’re masters, people who code to flex will probably be found at code golfing competitions instead

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Stop claiming that you have some piece of software that is “just as good as” Photoshop then. Stop acting like you have any software, quite frankly because GIMP, like sooo many other open source programs, are just “tech demos”. Some programmer wanted to flex his coding skills and out popped a piece of software that might be 11.5% faster than a commercial program, but is too clunky to use. This whole argument shows why Linux will always lose in the OS world because far too many of those who use it, and even more who develop for it just don’t get that at the end of the day people use computers to get work done, not to fiddle with this or fiddle with that. We aren’t here to praise the coding gods because you could accomplish some task. We need to edit a photo or color correct a video. We want to model something to 3D print or engineer a part that will be machined. Actual tasks that regular users do.

            • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I really don’t understand why you’re so damn salty, I did not claim that “it is just as good” at all, did you even read? I just told you to stop listening to those that tell you that without knowing what you do. And why do you keep insisting that every developer of free software is out there to show off their higher performance solutions, when it very clearly isn’t their only goal (and in this case I never heard anyone bragging that GIMP is so stupidly fast that it completely outclasses Photoshop), most times it’s actually an afterthought, to go back and improve the performance because after making something you realize with your own and the users’ testing, that some processes take too long.

    • Tag365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      What fixes would you apply to GIMP’s UI to make it better and more convenient to use?

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Follow industry “standards” that have existed for literally 3 decades.

        And yes, when a piece of software dominates it’s particular industry as much as Photoshop does, it is considered a standard.

        And to be clear, GIMP is just one of many such pieces of software that quite frankly are awful from a users perspective. Some will claim that “oh well it’s simply because it’s new software” but it’s far, far more than that and it shows a complete disconnect between those who write the software and those who use the software.

        I find it curious that a way better alternative to GIMP is the browser-based Photopea which is partially open source. It doesn’t have the speed for heavy work because it runs in your browser, but because it mirrora Photoshop, it’s workflow is far more natural to someone who edits photos for a living. Doing a quick search it looks like a single person worked on Photopea, while almost 100 people over many more years have been working on GIMP. One is typical open source software - a bunch of people trying to learn a bit of programming, trying to flex their skills but clearly not actual graphic artist.

    • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As a consumer image editing program? GIMP is more than sufficient. I think the UI is too complex for its capabilities (paint.net is a much better middle ground), but it is pretty consistent for providing that “better than MS paint” that most people need. Where the UI/UX falls apart is when you are applying significantly more complex shaders/morphs/transforms and… that is also where GIMP largely demonstrates how completely inferior it is to photoshop and the like.

      Which is generally the issue with a lot of the popular linux software (and I say this as a linux user/lover). The UI/UX is arguable for the quality (GIMP and Blender are pretty consistent once you think the right way. FreeCAD is a god damned mess) but… it just doesn’t compare at all to the industry standard tools and there are reasons nobody who “does this for a living” uses these tools (and no, I don’t mean a kid who does graphic design for local websites where his mom knows the owner).

      Personally? I love GIMP. But the majority of image editing I do is futzing with color schemes, resizing/cropping, converting, and removing metadata. It gives me the power to make a really funny spray at a LAN party but… yeah.

      • ARO3DP@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know this is a standard Linux user awnser but: You should try PhotoGimp. It brings the PS ui to Gimp.

        • Puzzle_Sluts_4Ever@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Its not even (just) the UI. It is the outright capabilities. Like with a lot of these kinds of tools, photoshop is… kind of freaking insane in its capabilities. Which is why it is so funny to hear the art/graphics community talk about how “AI can’t do our jobs” when so many of the tools they rely on are AI based.

          A good, linux friendly, answer (that also kind of highlights the issue but…) is to compare nano versus vim/emacs. For 99% of people, nano is just as capable and arguably better in a lot of cases. But if you want something that is closer to an IDE/operating system, you are looking at vim/emacs.

          Or, one that is less contrived: if you are writing a letter or even a short report, MS Word/Libre Write (?)/Google Docs is perfectly suitable and, arguably, a lot better. If you are writing a scholarly article or even a book? You want something where typesetting is a first class citizen and that means Latex or whatever the publishing industry likes. There are ways to set up references and figures correctly in a WYSIWYG rich text editor like MS Word but… it is very much not the same thing and you are spending a lot of time trying to pretend you are using the right tools.

        • soul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thank you for mentioning and subsequently introducing this to me. Definitely a nice modification of GIMP. I’m used to GIMP’s interface from years of use, but this is simply much more intuitive.

    • heeplr@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the problem with the Linux crowd. You guys write software to write software and not because you are a user of that software.

      It’s a problem you have since your OS pretends that Software (or a Computer in general) isn’t complex.

      Linux crowds use *NIX principles that are >50 years old and didn’t change a lot, because they work. Not because some software devs circlejerk or want to annoy you.

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is the most Linux-ist answer ever.

        I’m talking from a users perspective. I don’t give a flying fuck about whatever development technologies you are taking about because ultimately I don’t care. The vast majority of people don’t know - or care - how their car works. They just know it has to start. That’s how you folks lose the battle. You wrote code because you want to practice your skills or learn some new techniques or just because your bored. That’s great. That’s fine. But you’re not asking people that USE that software HOW it’s used. Next to zero effort is put into workflow. Your code might be fast. It might be bug free. Congrats, but if it takes 10 clicks to accomplish something that other software can do in 2, then that’s a problem. If the workflow is totally disjointed and not how a graphic designer actually works, then what good is that 2.735% more efficient code going to do for them?

        The fact that my post was about UI and workflow and youre talking about Unix principlea speaks volumes to why open source software tends to be so bad from a users perspective.

        • heeplr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m talking from a users perspective.

          no, you’re talking from a patreon perspective. You have no clue of the subject and you simply demand people serving stuff the way you think is best. Also you don’t care why things are the way they are.

          Basically a Karen User.

          The vast majority of people don’t know - or care - how their car works. They just know it has to start.

          Exactly. The vast majority buys a $50.000 car and only use 2% of it’s features. And if the manufacturer starts to charge for a feature you like or decides to spy on you, there’s nothing you can do about it.

          • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What part of this don’t you understand?

            I KNOW I’m not talking like a developer. I’m not one. I’m a fucken user. That’s the point. The point that so many piece of open source software completely miss.

            And you just did it again.

            I don’t care if there is a little gerbil in a wheel spinning inside my machine. I don’t care if it is a nuclear reactor making it go. To the user, that’s is immaterial and you are missing that point.

            As a user I don’t care HOW a piece of software is made. I care that it works and I can get my work done. There is a workflow to most jobs. You do this before you do that. You click on this tool 10x as often as this other one. Few open source programs bother to understand that all important work flow because usually the people writing the code aren’t the people who ultimately use the code.

            I can say it again and again and again and I just know I haven’t gotten through to you.

            • heeplr@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              What part of this don’t you understand?

              I understand all of it. I just point out your dilemma. Your whining will get you nowhere.

              You’re a user not willing to read manuals completely but expect stuff to work at your fingertips. You’ll get older and as stuff keeps changing, you’ll find it harder and harder to catch on. You’ll spend a shitload of money to people promising the ease of good old patterns you are used to but you just can’t keep up with folks using more efficient techniques.

              And well, FOSS just doesn’t seem to be your thing. Obviously, you need to unload your frustration on some service hotline worker… or random people online.

              • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why should open source software demand that a user “read manuals completely” and yet other software doesn’t require that? Are the people who program open source software that talentless that they don’t even know how a user of their own software uses it? That’s a FAILURE of the developer. Time is money, and if it takes for me to purchase a piece of commercial software to get the kind of talent to write software which makes me a more efficient worker, then hell yeah most people will be willing to do just that. But then let’s please stop pretending that Linux and most open software is a viable alternative. It’s not. It’s mostly just a “tech demo”. The arrogance of the Linux community is pretty hilarious.

        • heeplr@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which principle exactly? Early motif UIs still are in use in a lot of nieche applications.

          Not saying UI design is easy or FOSS apps shine with excellent GUIs, but they work for their users and complaining doesn’t help.

          My point is: Either improve the UI or pay someone to improve it. Or at least make a suggestion to the devs but don’t blame linux people for not providing a free product perfectly adapted to your personal habits.

            • heeplr@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I was talking about all *nix-typical principles. e.g. that everything should integrate into batched jobs. Modularity. Human readable error messages. Transparent logging. Integrated software repositories & version control, man pages. file permissions & user groups. etc.

              Stuff that seems strange and unnecessary complex for new users, who don’t know how to use stuff.

    • Milady@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      A clunky UI - which is far, far too common on open source applications

      So, what are you going to do about it ? Contribute ? Learn the ins and outs of gimp, and propose some UI changes ? And if you don’t have time to do that, who does / who cares enough for that ? People who code stuff like GIMP generally don’t really care for UI, or have the time. They’re volunteers, passionate people. Not designers.

      That’s also a broad generlization. Firefox has bad UI/UX ? (Sometimes yeah on some niche things but I wholeheartedly believe google is at fault somehow) What about Krita ? Blender has been doing UI work last I heard of it, so that’s also that. Paint.net was also open source. Chromium has bad UI ? Android ? Vs Code ? GNOME ? KDE ? Element ? Jitsi ? Signal ? Wordpress ?

      Yeah, gimp sucks. And the type of people who are “linux elitists”, that tell you you suck for not enjoying bad UI, also suck. But why not make a meaningful change to the world ? Try to hope for a world where GIMP is actually usable ?

      • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If all you want to do it text your programming muscles, then do so. But don’t claim you’ve developing a useable piece of software. I mentioned this to someone already… A far better alternative is Photopea. It’s browser based and is partially open source. While GIMP has almost 100 people tied to the project, Photopea was written by ONE guy. And it’s great. Again, within the limitations of what browser-based software can offer. But it mirrors Photoshop as closely as possible and is a joy to use as long as the project doesn’t get too heavy (because again, it runs in your browser). So since clearly GIMP wasn’t written by people who give a shit about the end product as a real usable tool, then maybe the Linux community should stop proclaiming that it’s a real usable tool whenever someone asks “ok, but what kind of software can I use on it?”.

        • QuazarOmega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You sidestepped the topic of “open source apps have bad UI/UX by default”, that’s just not true. I agree that GIMP has pretty bad UX, there’s no questioning it, it also has a long history and that means technical debt when devs don’t work on it very consistently, the Photopea dev got to start anew so they could skip working on old code. I think we also underestimate that the widespread availability of clear UI and UX guidelines in recent years that came with the emergence of new platforms like Material for Android initially and then all other platforms subsequently, helps a lot in shaping how non-designers can imagine the layout of their software.
          The project is also important to their livelihood (since it is commercial) so the dev will put all their effort into making it better.

          This is meant more as an explanation rather than an excuse of course, but it’s also to say that yeah, maybe if one of us wanted they could make the next cross platform Photoshop, but they need the skill, the time and the incentive to work on it. Plenty of free software manages to have a good interface even without being commercial, but when the type of things they try to achieve is a very big undertaking you can see that most glaring examples have the money going in it (Blender), others survive on being simpler, being born later, having more dedicated developers that maybe get to work on a new exciting/pleasant language etc.
          There are certainly exceptions to the rule, but you really do notice it. Another interesting example is Thunderbird that for so long has remained stagnant with its aging UI/UX rules (some might think they were always better, I guess that’s up for debate) and now after painstaking work to modernize the code they were successful in also modernizing the interface quite a bit.

  • akash_rawal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Everything seems to be way faster on Linux than on windows for some reason.

    On one occasion I tested a build that took ~10 min on windows, in a Linux VM installed on the same machine, it finished in ~1min.

    I have searched around for an answer for quite some time now, I could not find any definitive reason. Some say that process creation is slower on windows, some say IO is inefficient. Still struggling to explain 10x increase in throughput.

    Here is a funny instance: https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/17783/why-does-emacs-take-longer-to-start-on-windows-than-on-linux

    • gosling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IMO it’s because Windows is targeted for general use so they don’t bother optimizing anything. They’ll just convince people that thei have aging hardware when things become slow and say stuffs like “unused RAM is wasted RAM” to justify taking up half of my memory on idle.

      Even running Linux from a USB is still a way smoother experience than running Windows for me.

      • akash_rawal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Windows is so not optimised (unoptimized?) that I cannot even see what is slow anymore. Doesn’t look like windows is targeted for anything in this state.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I thinks it caused by two reasons:

      • process creation has much higher overhead on windows. On top of that, the antivirus system adds additional overhead not present in Linux because it scan every process on launch and monitor its behavior until the process finished. This result in any workflow that relies on launching a bunch of processes (e.g. make-style compilation which launch the compiler process recursively) to be very slow on Windows.
      • file access on windows is also significantly slower on windows due to its filesystem filter. Also, antivirus typically hook into this filter and inspect every opened files. You can imagine this would result in significant slowdown for any workflow that relies on opening a lot of small files (e.g. compilation)

      If you disable the antivirus (including windows defender) performance would definitely improve, but it’ll still slower than on Linux.

      In order to gain sufficient performance in windows, you’ll have to use threads instead of processes (basically a single program doing everything instead of chaining multiple program Unix-style) and put your data in a single file so it can load all at once instead of in a bunch of small files loaded recursively. Basically a complete opposite of what people do on Linux.

      • akash_rawal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for information.

        Some day I might try to controllaby worsen process creation and file access of Linux to match windows performance. Not today though.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      for some reason.

      bloat

      I ran Atlus for a second before installing PopOS and Windows can be just as fast if you remove literally everything

      Atlus suffers from the fact that it’s still just windows though so all the underlying issues are still there.

    • athlon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, in case of Gimp for Windows, it also doesn’t help that it uses a modified GTK. So, when you start on Gimp on Windows, the program must load all the GTK libraries first, while on Linux the shared libraries are already loaded.

  • KluEvo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Am I going crazy or something? Gimp loads in under 5 seconds on windows for me, and that’s with an absurd amount of crap (unity, blender, a vm, and 400+ browser tabs across 5 browsers) running in the background.

      • KluEvo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh? It’s a “thin-and-light” gaming laptop, so it’s quite decent, but idk if that counts as ‘godly’.

        • Arutttelar@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tbf they did say ‘sounds like’

          and it does sound like it, if you’re casually running all of that and still booting up gimp

          unity, blender, a vm, and 400+ browser tabs across 5 browsers

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows cheats with scheduler. When foreground app uses a lot of CPU or IO, background apps basically stop running.

  • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Me: Export this 256x256 PNG.

    Gimp on windows: Bro, you’d better get a drink and a snack.

    • TheBERFA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you need a better PC my man. Takes me under a second for images upwards of 2000x2000.

      • Psaldorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a beast, 3080, recent CPU. I can do the same thing in inkscape in a fraction of a second.

        I’ve been living in image software hell since fireworks disappeared. Why can’t someone make vector and image manip together? Frustrating.

  • nx5qly@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kind of funny because I was using an old laptop earlier to recover a partition that Mac fucked up.

    Instead of clicking GParted, I accidentally clicked GIMP. For a Core2Duo computer with 4GB RAM, 2 seconds wasn’t an exaggeration.

    Distro was Manjaro.