• Aria@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t you guys just stop using Adrian Zens? Is no one else able to make up unhinged nonsense about China? Literally all it takes is for him to adopt a pseudonym and the credibility of the propaganda increases entirely for free.

    • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      He’s a credible source, you’re just mad that China is shit and Marxism is shit and he’s making it look bad.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        How could you possibly believe this? Which part of his work do you find well reasoned? Is it the work he does with VoC where he says Covid-19 is a communist weapon? Is it Worthy to Escape where he says that if you abuse women, homosexuals or children, you’re always morally in the right because those actions repel the Antichrist?

    • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      What does he have to do with this story? His name isn’t mentioned in the article.

      • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d like to draw attention to how every tankie who commented in this thread actually looked at the sources whereas the liberals mostly read the headline.

        • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Did you really look at the sources? Because the first source in the article links another BBC article (which links to another article) that ultimately sources research from the Uyghur Human Rights Project. That project does not appear to have any connection to Adrian Zenz. So my original question still stands what does Adrian Zenz have to do with this?

          You say every tankie who commented actually looked at the sources but, as far as I can tell, they are just parroting propaganda talking points that they are accusing everyone else of falling for.

          Look, I get being skeptical of what the West says about China but I don’t think anyone can deny that anything anti China gets quickly astroturfed on Lemmy. I’m seeing lots more knee jerk reactions from tankies that obviously did not read the article and are accusing everyone else of just falling for Western propaganda without doing some real introspection that they are basically just doing the same thing.

          • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Adrian Zens is integral to the Uyghur Human Rights Project. I suppose I don’t do new research, I just follow links until I find something I’ve judged as untrustworthy before. He’s not directly credited as a contributor, but Uyghur Human Rights Project uses him as their source for all their publishing, and invites him to their events.

            • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well, I don’t know what else to tell you. I couldn’t find anything about him on their site or him being used for any of research that I looked into. Now, I didn’t go over everything so it is possible he’s worked with them in the past but I don’t think that would be a reason to discredit all the work the UHRP.

              What am I seeing is anything critical of China getting downvoted and a bunch of people congrating themselves for not falling for the propaganda when I literally looked and could not find anything they were claiming as part of the article.

              I encourage anyone seeing all these comments discrediting this story and look into the details yourself. I could not find any evidence for all the claims they are making to discredit this. There has been some good thoughtful discussion and I appreciate that but lots of knee jerk reactions that people not doing proper research when even just a cursory check doesn’t back up what they are claiming.

              • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Okay. I think this is a very fair and good comment. So this is their most recent published work. https://uhrp.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/UHRP-Humanitarian-Needs-Report_2023-02-01.pdf.pdf

                Ctrl F, RFA 7 matches, RFERL 6 matches, radio free 7 matches, uhrp.org to see how many times they source themselves. There are 23 matches but only 19 instances of them using circular sourcing. ASPI 1 match. Jamestown 2 matches. There are some better sources in there, like Human Rights Watch, but the HRW article in question uses Adrian Zenz as their source. The only source I’m seeing quickly that isn’t directly with zero steps of separation tied to a NATO member spy agency or propaganda agency is NY Times.

                For the New York Times article though be careful following their Tinyurl link because it goes through a Viglink reroute that is unlikely to be safe. I can’t imagine why else they’d find it appropriate to use a tinyurl link in their paper if not to attack readers. You can use an extractor service. But anyway if you read that article you’ll see that their source is only Uyghur Human Rights Project so it’s a circular citation again. No I don’t check stuff like this every time. But by now we should know that Uyghur Human Rights Project is an untrustworthy front for Adrian Zenz and stop when we encounter it.

                • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not their most recent published work. That was published in Feb 2023 and they released a more recent report on Jul 2023 (and I believe it has less troublesome references but I’ll admit I don’t have the time to go through them all):

                  https://uhrp.org/statement/uhrp-submits-comprehensive-report-for-un-consideration-of-chinas-human-rights-record/

                  Regardless, your point still stands, there’s likely more circular referencing than I originally believed. I’m still not convinced it is as much of a conspiracy as others have claimed, but it is food for thought. I appreciate the less combative tone and a willingness to discuss in good faith.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Anyone reading the above comment, simple Google “Uyghur Human Rights Project Adrian Zenz” and investigate how involved he is with the links on their own website that show up. It will be obvious how full of shit this poster is.

        • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I followed the citations in this article and he did not come up so I’m not sure what you are talking about.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Adrian Zens is integral to the Uyghur Human Rights Project.

            This is honestly pretty dismaying. This isn’t meant as a put down because it is outside of your control but we’ve got to work on investigative literacy as a country if so many people are having a hard time doing simple stuff like this.

            • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              How is he so integral? I’ve looked all over their site and at a few of their reports and there’s nothing about it him or his findings? Look, I’m willing to hear people out but I’ve looked and I can’t find anything that backs up what people are claiming here so I don’t think it’s me that needs to work on investigative literacy.

              I encourage anyone on the fence about this to do their own research. His Wikipedia article has some interesting points:

              "As a result of his work on Xinjiang, Zenz has become a target for coordinated disinformation attacks from pro-Beijing and Chinese state-run media, as well as other state-affiliated entities. Zenz and his work on Xinjiang have been criticized by the Chinese government, which, according to The Globe and Mail, “has called his findings ‘lies’—even when it confirmed them.

              “During an interview with The Daily Telegraph published in May 2021, Zenz defended himself against allegations of fabrication, noting that 95% of documents he has analyzed are publicly available government records.”

              Plus his findings have been corroborated by lots of reputable reporters. I’ve seen a lot of claims that people need to stop believing the lies and look at the sources. I’ve done that and not found what they are claiming so what exactly am I missing here?

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Did you google “Uyghur Human Rights Project Adrian Zenz” before replying to my previous comment?

                Also did you look at who funds the org? Because it is the US government through NED through only one shell, it isnt hard to look up.

                His Wikipedia article has some interesting points:

                As hopefully your high school librarian has explained to you already, Wikipedia is not a good source.

                • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yep, I googled it and I encourage everyone else to do it too. There was nothing. I did see a few Chinese sources calling him out as fraud but nothing unbiased. I did see lots of other credible organizations backing up his findings too.

                  The Wikipedia article was simply a good starting point that I encouraged people to check out. There’s tons of citations in there that back up their points.

    • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I found this to be a decent enough primer: https://medium.com/@bobbyarlan/a-case-study-in-racist-anti-chinese-sentiment-fuelled-by-american-bots-and-western-propaganda-f0a69978d568

      A decent TLDR: The article argues that anti-Chinese propaganda spread by the U.S. and Western media is fueling racist sentiment. Claims of mass detention of Uyghurs are based on flawed studies and sources like Adrian Zenz, a far-right Christian fundamentalist. Atrocity propaganda is a common tactic used by the U.S. to justify wars. The U.S. is threatened by China’s economic rise and technological progress, so it is trying to portray China negatively and prepare public opinion for a potential conflict. However, most of the world sees China positively and as an economic opportunity, making a new Cold War against China unlikely to succeed

      In short, a lot of information about China that has come out of Western news media has been proven to be based on known biased sources, known anit-China rhetoric, and/or outright lies. It’s difficult to prove/disprove of any information specifically, that takes time and reporting, but a lot of people see the anti-China pattern in BBC reporting, and tend to dismiss it because of known history.

        • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or the fact we literally have drone and camera footage of mass arrests. I’m not one to view Vice these days, but one of their reporters went there and saw some rather suggestive situations as well.

          After Trump was so nice (dumb) enough to showcase just how clear US satellite photos are these days, one has to question why some here are so quick to cry in China’s defense. Especially after the very public take over of Hong Kong, you think an ethnic cleanse is out of the question?

          I’m sure some pro-Chinese twit will come rushing in with some whataboutism or a crack on US history, as if that excuses things.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Especially after the very public take over of Hong Kong, you think an ethnic cleanse is out of the question?

            After China followed the diplomatic agreement it had with Britain for decades to handle the transition from Hong Kong being a British colony back to it being under the jurisdiction of its own nation (as a Special Autonomous Region exempted, like other such regions, from a great portion of federal law), now that means China will do ethnic cleansing? Most of Hong Kong supports the mainland, but that falls very much along class lines. The protestors you saw on western news 24/7 for a while were mostly members of wealthier families who don’t represent the majority.

            I have mixed feelings about the protest itself in that I think back when it was more fragmented there were surely meaningful segments that weren’t concerned about an extremely normal (but now withdrawn anyway) extradition law, but once it became the Five Demands and begging for their white colonizers to return, the highest credit I can give them is that they still were at least dignified enough to turn away Azov fascists who visited them.

          • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            Especially after the very public take over of Hong Kong, you think an ethnic cleanse is out of the question?

            You’re projecting. China exempted ethnic minorities from the one child policy, that is how anti “han supremacist”(which itself is just white supremacist projection) they are.

            And the people of Hong Kong are 90 percent Han.

          • Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean the nice thing about the internet is that you can at least find videos documenting what the article claims. I mean sure… it could all just be propaganda. But somehow there is a little much of it from so many different sources.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You say this and yet, what videos? How many have you actually watched vs assumed were there vs read the headline? I’ve seen a bunch of photos and videos and all of them were either hoaxes (calling normal buildings camps), ridiculous misunderstandings (like saying the screeching of brakes was screaming victims), or gross misrepresentations (e.g. normal prison transfers being a slate of new genocide victims). But if you just skim through what just so happens to trend on Reddit, you’ll see atrocity after atrocity and not stick around long enough to see the retraction, or the people in the comments debunking it, and so on.

              There’s a reason neoliberal outlets walked their claims back to “cultural genocide” over time, because there was nothing there except the testimony of like three people from a region of 15 million.

              • Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean I’ve seen a few recordings of Chinese officials calling folks abroad and making „suggestions“. That was more than just reading headlines.

                But I guess you are right. It’s likely all propaganda and China is a paradise.

        • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also your summary sounds like ChatGPT

          Nah they have a typo (“anit-China”) in their summary I think they’re fine.

        • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          We put a lot of stock in personal stories, but we also pay a lot for incriminating evidence against China.

          Do you know about the 1 child policy (That was recently ended?) And how that affects this? Because I actually looked into it. But I bet an online personality won’t change your mind. So I won’t even bother.

          Remember America didn’t forcefully sterilize anyone. We just straight up bombed them, raped them, and shot them.

          Your biases are showing.

      • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think this flies a bit too far in the other direction. China is totalitarian. It is not a democracy. It is also increasingly antagonizing nations abroad. I think it is valid to consider it a threat if you are any other nation, period.

        Edit: Kinda like Russia

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How many seats are in the highest legislative body?

          What rights and responsibilities do autonomous regions within China have?

          What is the most distributed government legislative committee type and what is their role in the government?

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            1, Xi Xinping and whatever he says, doesn’t matter how many show ponys you fill the room with.

            1. In the end they all answer to the whims of the central government, which can change or remove and rights and responsibilities autonomous regions within China have.

            2. See answer one.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              1, Xi Xinping and whatever he says, doesn’t matter how many show ponys you fill the room with.

              Do you know what a legislative body is? Anglophones are almost all educated on “executive, legislative, judicial” aren’t they? Xi is the leader of the Executive branch in China, not the Legislative or Judicial.

              • yeather@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                You do know what a dictator is right? You can call yourself the head of this and that and have cronies technically control the rest, but it’s not fooling anyone slightly smarter than the average microwave. It’s inherently evident you do Xi Xinpings bidding no matter where you are placed or you will be replaced. Not a hard concept, even someone like you can understand.

                • Aria@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I understand you think Xi Xinping is very good at kung fu because he’s Chinese, so there’s nothing anyone can do to stop his Hokuto Shinken, but China actually has over a milliard Chinese people, and they’re equally Chinese, so their Kung Fu should be just as strong. Hope this helps =)

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Such fierce condescension and yet you’re the one pushing a children’s story. All these hundreds and thousands of representatives, all the millions of Party members, are just puppets under the Bad Guy’s control. There was no violence to install him, the existing government put him there (since I assume you don’t endorse Chinese elections) and then he played an Uno Reverse and now they are all an extension of him, with all of Chinese politics then becoming merely being a matter of how much people chaff under the collars and fetters he fixes to them. When politicians fight each other? When journalists fire back and forth in the papers? When policy goes one way and then pivots? It’s all just a Potemkin Village with a few hundred million people as the staff.

                  So no, “someone like me” cannot understand how such a thing could exist outside of a children’s cartoon or a similar sort of story told to an audience that is very much suspending its disbelief.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              So what I’m hearing is it doesn’t matter if you’re ignorant about the way China works because the US media told you Xi is an evil dictator who controls everything and you believed them. Got it.

              • yeather@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, Xi is an evil dictator who controls everything he wants to. It doesn’t matter if you technically control something you will always end up doing the bidding of Xi or you will disappear. From reading your replies, it’s evident you have fallen for Chinese propaganda and now simp for an evil dictator and totalitarian regimes. Got it.

        • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          So… No, it’s not like Russia at all. But that nuance is too long for me to explain right now. Short answer is that Russia is capitalist, and China is 50/50 capitalist/socialist, depending on definitions, and yeah a lot of nuance.

          But China is run by the people, their authoritarian politics keeps their billionaires and induatry in check. Their local politics is a negotiation with the national politics.

          And… How exactly is China antagonizing nations abroad? Because a lot of countries are choosing to work with China because they AREN’T antagonizing them as much as America and Europe. So… The reality is the opposite.

          • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, if you haven’t been there or don’t know anyone from there you could pretend they are a democracy, but they are authoritarian like Russia is authoritarian. Long term they will seek a wider swath to be authoritarian over.

            • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              And the argument from ignorance continues.

              All I have to say is read more and be online less.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Newsflash, you can find people in any country who don’t like their government, and you’ll obviously see these people over represented in the population that left the country. The fallacy of your argument is to conclude that the people you know hold the opinion of the majority of people in China. I made plenty of friends who from China in university, and most of them went back after graduating. Vast majority of people in China support their government and are proud of their country. Even western polling admits this.

                • yeather@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Quick tip, arguing with tankies gets you nowhere, let them waddle in their own filth and move on with your life.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              If Taiwan is its own nation, they should really specify that in their constitution instead of claiming to be the rightful government of all of China and Mongolia.

              • UFO@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                That still makes it a nation… That claims to be the rightful government. These are not mutually exclusive haha

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That claim is mutually exclusive with Taiwan being “its own nation” distinct from China. It is definitionally its own government, but it claims to be a superset of the nation of China (because of also claiming Mongolia and some smaller territories). Nations are a social construct based on historical group identities, so the PRC is the same nation as the ROC was back when the ROC controlled the mainland. The ROC claims to still be that nation (plus Mongolia) which the PRC currently administers.

      • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently there is a PRC smear campaign against Adrian Zenz - https://www.mandiant.com/resources/blog/pro-prc-information-operations-campaign-haienergy, including by creating what Mandiant describes as what they “suspect to be at least three fabricated letters based on obvious grammatical errors and typos” to smear him - so I’d take anything that is ad hominem attacks against him rather than debating his actual work with a grain of salt.

        However, even if you don’t accept his writings, there are plenty of other people who have done credible research into the plight of the Uyghur people - e.g. resources contributed to https://xjdp.aspi.org.au/, such as articles like this one by Gene A. Bunin: https://livingotherwise.com/2021/01/04/the-elephant-in-the-xuar-ii-brand-new-prisons-expanding-old-prisons-and-hundreds-of-thousands-new-inmates/.

        • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, insults, the highest form of conversation. Always indicates you are correct. Good job.

    • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      This, my friend, is the absense of neocon/neolib censorship and propaganda that you were so used to on corporate social media.

      Isn’t it great?

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strange, I never had any trouble on Reddit talking about socialism.

        • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          As long as you don’t question that the enemies of US imperialism deserve it you should be mostly fine. The big geopolitical topics are more sensitive.

          I was permabanned from multiple subs for sharing this telegraph article for example:

          https://web.archive.org/web/20230701133656/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8555142/Wikileaks-no-bloodshed-inside-Tiananmen-Square-cables-claim.html

          It differs from sub to sub but the bigger and more political the stronger the imperial narrative is enforced.

          r/worldnews is one of the worst, and honestly suspect its astroturf and run by assets or a derivative of an imperial institution (council on foreign relation, think tanks, the likes)

          • socsa@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are literally pictures of bloodshed.

            I legitimately don’t understand why Leninists are so keen on making folk heroes out of tyrants. Why exert the energy to defend this shit instead of learning from it and building a better class of socialist??

            • ImOnADiet🇵🇸 (He/Him)@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll listen to western leftists when we actually take power and have to learn to use it to defend ourselves, currently we have a big fat 0 in the wins department

            • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I legitimately don’t understand why Leninists are so keen on making folk heroes out of tyrants.

              What a sentence! You’re jumping to conclusions all over the place!

              You’re conflating information with a desire to “make folk heroes out of tyrants”, trying to denormalise a desire to understand what was actually happening.

              There was bloodshed but not on the Tienanmen square and the conditions are less clear than you believe

              It is obvious that most peoples idea of what happened is heavily influenced by propaganda, I know mine was.

              If you could stop sabotaging efforts to cut through the disinformation that would be great thanks

              Also: “They are tyrants” thanks I’ll defer judgement as long as the evidence you present us with turns out to be propaganda, there are other “tyrannical governments” much more in reach

              • socsa@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                A big part of my gripe here is precisely the idea that one can engage in critical analysis of statecraft, while hand waving away inconvenient statecraft. Or worse - supporting broad censorship of inconvenient statecraft.

                • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A big part of my gripe here is precisely the idea that one can engage in critical analysis of statecraft, while hand waving away inconvenient statecraft. Or worse - supporting broad censorship of inconvenient statecraft.

                  I have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean.

                  My gripe here is that nobody can have an informed opinion on foreign policy if they do not acknowledge the tons of pro US propaganda that surround them on EVERY issue in this category and dominate most of it.

                  It is important to call you out on your power-serving statements.

                  You tried to push critical thought out of the overton window when you painted it a kind of sacrilege (“make folk heroes out of tyrants”) and everyone engaging in it someone that needs to be shunned by society (a “tankie”).

                  Mind you all without addressing, let alone contesting, the facts.

                  With all due respect: As long as your actions are indistinguishable from those of a US intelligence social media asset, don’t expect any good will engagement.

                  Have an open mind and start to reflect a little more

      • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t ironic how tankies are entirely fueled by propaganda but they always bitch about propaganda (aka anything they don’t like including facts)

        • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Lol standard halfwit take:

          Adopting the “tankie” slur for everyone without substance and obviously no knowledge of what they are talking about - check

          Being embedded in propaganda and blaming others who point it out - check

          “You’re not including facts” - lol for what? Am I responding to a factual argument? Am I demanding facts from you?

          But sure have some facts:

          Guardian from 2011 - Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media

          Intercept from 2014 - HACKING ONLINE POLLS AND OTHER WAYS BRITISH SPIES SEEK TO CONTROL THE INTERNET

          Believe me it has only gotten worse in the >10 years since

          Twitter files revealed pentagon bots were whitelisted as well

          If you miss your propaganda friends that hard reddit is still there for you

          Edit: I realize your missing punctuation threw me off, I read: “(aka anything, they don’t like including facts)” …doesn’t change much though

    • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d take the study a lot more seriously if the people financing it weren’t literally tied to the US/UK governments…

      • yeather@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’d all take China a lot more seriously if it wasn’t literally interring people in reeducation camps and ruling over people’s lives like it’s 1984.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          You need to catch up with the narrative, rheyre claiming the crackdown is over now that tourists are coming in and not noticing anything.

          • yeather@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man it’s almost like the vast majority of tourists stick to coastal cities and big urban areas where the Uighur population isn’t and not the vast desert that these camps and people’s exist in.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wait, do you think there aren’t people who tour Muslim cultural sites, of which there are many? Do you not think that anyone ever goes to interior spots? In the US, the rocky mountains and the Appalachians are both used a lot for tourism.

              Do you think there aren’t uyghurs in the cities in the region?

              It sounds like you dont know anything about the situation and are trying to justify already held beliefs by making rhetoric that doesn’t really apply to the reality of the situation.

              • yeather@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Buddy, this was incredibly easy to search. The Uyghur population mainly lives in Xinjiang, composed primarily of the Gobi desert. While somewhat popular with domestic travel, it is at the bottom of the list for international travel statistics. This is also something you can very easily hide in the desert. You act like reeducation camps have to be placed next to cities. You can visit North Korea and never see their work camps either. I know more about the situation than you, as evident by your many replies that spout nothing and don’t cover your own base. You’ve been overtaken by propaganda, you should educate yourself and the many many problems the Uyghur population is currently facing from China.

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You can visit North Korea and never see their work camps either.

                  Firstly, there is much more restriction on tourist movement in the DPRK for a litany of reasons, mostly pertaining to national security. Tourists in Xinjiang can move pretty freely, though if they are going all over the place they will cumulatively need to pass through many checkpoints.

                  Secondly, “work camps” here is what people call prison labor in Bad Country. The DPRK has prisons, certainly, and we can have discussions about penal labor, but it’s much less notable than people pretend and much less secretive as well.

                  Thirdly, “work camps” are not remotely comparable to committing genocide against one tenth of the entire population of the region, which is the claim that was popularly made against Xinjiang before it got walked back to “cultural genocide”.

    • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s with all the conspiracy nutcases here? The fucking Uighur genocide… smh, are the space lizards making China do this or is it Sasquatch man?

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What’s with all the conspiracy nutcases here? The fucking Uighur genocide…

        … is mostly sourced from a far right German nationalist who’s been proven to mistranslate Chinese documents over and over again, and claims that God gave him a mission to destroy China.

        … has been debunked by many Muslim countries visiting China to investigate

        … is a media narrative connected to the US funding radical Islamic groups to destabilize east turkestan and failing miserably as the Chinese response was mostly improving economic conditions and funding uyghur cultural programs which actually is effective at deradicalization, which is what the US could have done in Iraq in Afghanistan if they were over there for altruistic or mutually beneficial reasons and not just to extract oil and opium while making some defense contractors very rich.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lots of mainstream western racists are now here after reddit migration. It’s a good reminder of just how deranged people who guzzle western propaganda all day are.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It seems to be a much greater conspiracy to claim that there is a genocide going on over a huge population concentrated in the region without producing a massive refugee crisis like we saw with other genocides (e.g. the Holocaust) and with a massive dearth of photo/video evidence despite most young people in China having a VPN on their phones.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly, if we look at an actual genocidal situation then we have to look no further than Afghanistan where US has been massacring people for the past two decades and created 2.6 million refugees in the process https://www.unhcr.org/countries/afghanistan

          If anything remotely like what the west claims was happening in Xinjiang then we’d see a huge flood of refugees in the neighbouring countries.

    • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see it all over Lemmy unfortunately. I think it is because Lemmy is still relatively fringe and it is where lots of pro communism communities emerged. Normally, I find it actually pretty refreshing to see more left wing stuff but the pro China (or at least the kneejerk reactions to anything anti China) to be exhausting.

      To be fair, I used to see a lot of it on Reddit as well. I think they are just a bigger proportion percentage wise on Lemmy so you see much more of it.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a bit of a mixed bag. There are a lot of pro-China comments that are just… Well they either drank the kool-aid or are dishing it out. Especially when it comes to social policies.

        On the other hand, China has been making significant technological accomplishments that you just don’t hear about in Western media. They’ve made a lot of advancements in spaceflight and manufacturing processes that humanity as a whole could benefit from if we were more cooperative. And that’s not even mentioning Nuclear Power.

        China is WAY ahead of the rest of the world when it comes to new nuclear power. They’re the only ones with Gen 4 reactors, the only ones working on Thorium reactors, and are on track to build over 100 new nuclear plants over the next few years. China is to nuclear power as the US is to weapons; sure other countries might be tinkering with some stuff, but there’s really no comparison when they’re doing more than the rest of the world combined.

        I wish there were more unbiased sources. Unfortunately, there’s usually only one of two sides. Either you get news from China which usually boils down to “We’re amazing and nothing we do is ever bad or wrong. Anyone saying otherwise is just lying because they’re jealous/afraid of our wild success!” Or you get news from the US/West that’s basically “China is a totalitarian poo-country that’s on the verge of collapse. They contribute nothing to global advancement and the only thing they’re good for is making cheap, poor quality, crap.”

        • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess you would have to sift the scientific literature to get a general idea. It would be the least biased source. Being totalitarian really helps with nuclear. Just look at what Germany has been up to.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being totalitarian really helps with nuclear.

            China is reforesting desertified land, but at what cost???

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really wish Lemmy supported defederation of instances by individual users (so I’d auto-block anything that came from lemmygrad or its users for any reason). I have been threatened with death by communists enough and just want to be left alone to my far-left-but-not-communist devices.

          • abraxas@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d love that, but as I said elsewhere I have communities I run and a post history. Are we talking about me just making myself a mod elsewhere and cutting all my post histories? I mean, it’s not the end of the world, but it’d be nice to keep my post histories coherent.

            Instrance transfer would be wonderful.

    • Gorilladrums@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy was literally a tankie shithole before the Reddit influx, and even then not much changed

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      First day on Lemmy? There are quite a few suspiciously active trolls on here, especially on worldnews communities

      Edit - ah right on cue

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re paid astroturfers and they don’t belong on Lemmy. Why the server admins refuse to police them, I just don’t know.

      • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wow, talk about conspiracy theories…

        “Every person who doesn’t participate in Sinophobi is paid off by the Chinese government”

        Like, really? You actually believe that? Was 911 an inside job? How hot DOES jet fuel get??? Is Q-anon real? Is the earth flat?

        If you’ve ever debunked a conspiracy theory, you should reconsider the idea that maybe, just maybe, not everyone hates China. It’s probably more likely than you think…

        Edit: And then they edited their comment to be more defensive instead. Perfect.

      • AEHNH@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Me and the boys waiting for the ccp checks liberals said we were getting:

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine thinking there are paid astroturfers on a tiny niche platform with a few thousand users. We have some utterly insane people here after reddit migration.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine thinking governments, fascists and PR agencies wouldn’t migrate to wherever people choose to hang out and continue their decades-long campaign to brainwash people into believing whatever is convenient for them.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see you don’t understand the concept of niches. Governments, fascists, and PR agencies are going to spend their effort where it makes the most impact. Only a brainwashed person couldn’t comprehend that people could legitimately disagree with their world view, and anybody who thinks different from them must therefore be a paid troll.

            • socsa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              PSA: these kinds of threads are a great way to create blocklists of western bootlickers and trolls.

              This you?

            • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              1 year ago

              And now you’re defending the practice.

              How about, you and the rest of the dumbasses pushing your propaganda garbage go find another place to peddle it? Like hell?

                • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How about you go fuck yourself instead? That’s all you can do anyway. We’re not going anywhere and we outnumber you.

                • socsa@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  First, I will take the compliment with grace.

                  Second, this forum deserves a better class of communist. This shit is just intellectually lazy.

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you don’t like it here then feel free to go somewhere else. Lemmy was a community of sane people who were capable of having civilized discussion, and then a bunch of reddit chuds flooded here and started acting like you own the place. Get over yourself.

                • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Bahaha look at you. “Everyone who disagrees with me is a bootlicker/troll/westerner.”

                  Edit for the bootlicking troll below: Ahem A straw man fallacy is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction. One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

                  You don’t understand what a straw man is.

                  You’re really bad at this. You even tried to copy my comment and failed miserably! Congratulations, you’re stupid in two languages!

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you provide even circumstantial evidence of people like myself being paid, or are you resorting to unhinged conspiracy theories to explain people vociferously disagreeing with you?

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          It literally wouldn’t even matter, you’ll just deny it and refuse to concede even the most minor of points because for you, debate is not a means to find truth, it’s a power play. We’ve all seen it countless times. We know your game, your patterns of behavior, and since you do not want to play fairly because you’ll know you’ll lose, you don’t get to play at all. You don’t get to participate in discussions with us, especially not me. You’re isolated to your cult now. I hope you find happiness in choosing genocide.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pardon me, I thought you were responding to a different comment (I was replying in my inbox to many different disputes). Seeing the actual context, this is ridiculous. You accuse me of being a paid actor and then say that you have no reason to present evidence of the accusation?

            Let us imagine that I was a paid actor and would behave exactly as you expect. Aren’t there other people reading the conversation? Wouldn’t it be worth proving to them that you aren’t just going on paranoid rants because your ideology has no way to deal with the concept of westerners freely disagreeing with you on these issues?

  • iknt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sample size: 58 people

    18 in the U.K., 28 in Turkey, and 12 in Thailand.

    The authors wish to extend their gratitude to the individuals and organisations who supported this research by providing concrete feedback for revisions on the report, offering suggestions and advice at the planning stages, and offering ongoing collaborative and moral support while conducting this research: Elise Anderson, Campaign for Uyghurs, Freedom House, Tim Grose, Ondřej Klimeš, Julie Millsap, David O’Brien, the Rights Practice, Radio Free Asia, Isabella Rodriguez, David Stroup, Hannah Theaker, Emily Upson, the Uyghur Human Rights Project, the Uyghur Transitional Justice Database, the World Uyghur Congress, the Xinjiang Documentation Project, the Xinjiang Victims’ Database, and Adrian Zenz.

    Author

    Yes, very trustable! /s

    • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is so key to propaganda. When researchers do a study on 58 people, you can barely claim you have a good representation of the population. And even in that case, if they are good, high quality researchers, they aren’t pushing any opinion, just stating facts. It’s just that 58 people can’t represent the population well, It’s just a starting point.

      Now if we’re talking about an opinion and not just stated facts, 58 people is hardly representative, easy to manipulate, especially when you don’t have to cite specifics, just conclusion.

      Okay, let’s assume these are facts. 58 people were threatened, etc. This is still propaganda. Opinion, and interpretation can push the conversation in one direction or the other very heavily.

      For example, let’s draw a comparison to a system that people find more familiar (For westerners, at least), such as the united states police system or the FBI. How many US citizens are threatened to stop talking when pushing the limits of conversation publicly (Say, about calling out the inhumane treatment of others by the US military)? How many people have talked publicly about being approached by the FBI, or said they can’t comment on their interactions with the FBI, or of some private corporation that paid them off to keep their mouths shut about some insider deal, money laundering, or underage sex scandal? Governments and even private citizens coming after people who are talking shit publicly happens in capitalist states all the time.

      And that’s just taking into account regular people who live in western countries. How about an even more direct comparison? The Uyghurs are Muslims that participated in terrorism in China, but the United States had Muslim terrorists of their own, what did they do? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_post-invasion_Iraq You can find all kinds of resources about the human rights violations that the united states participated in against the muslin people, even in western sources such as wikipidia, and others https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/03/iraq-20-years-since-the-us-led-coalition-invaded-iraq-impunity-reigns-supreme/ have lots and lots of facts surrounding this.

      “rules for thee, but not for me” comes to mind.

      Sorry didn’t mean to unload on you. I’m vehemently agreeing!

  • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just gonna sit back and enjoy the tankies from lemmygrad denying or trying to justify this one as well. 🍿

      • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine defending Russian and Chinese imperialism because “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”.

        • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          Neither China not Russia are imperialist. China is a socialist state so by definition cannot be and Russia is an immature industrial capitalist state.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ask Taiwan if if they think China is imperialistic. I’m sure you’ll get an answer.

          • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            China is a socialist state so by definition cannot be

            Can you elaborate on that? I agree that China is not imperialist, but I don’t see how socialism by definition precludes that possibility.

            • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Imperialism is the final stage of capitalism. Finance capitalism takes over from industrial capitalism and seeks out markets abroad, having exhausted the internal ones. It teams up with other finance capitalism to become a global force, the export of capital becomes the most prominent feature of the economy rather than the export of raw materials or finished goods. The states they come from tend to become fascist in nature, or as some people put it, “fascism is imperialism turned inward”.

              Even if China was a capitalist country as some people claim, it still wouldn’t be at that stage yet. Russia might wish to one day be there, but it too has a long way to go.

              • 133arc585@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                You didn’t answer what I asked.

                You said that capitalism by definition leads to imperialism. I asked how socialism by definition precludes imperialism.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I would suggest reading “Imperialism, the highest stage of Capitalism”

                  Imperialism has a highly specific definition.

                • abraxas@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  They’re saying if Communists do it, it’s not Imperialism even if it looks exactly the same.

                  They are willfully committing an equivocation fallacy, using their definition of “Imperialism” as being necessarily related to Capitalism. The textbook definition of Imperialism does NOT necessarily relate to capitalism, so you are indeed in the right.

                  a policy of extending a country’s power and influence through diplomacy or military force. -Imperialism

                  A non-capitalist country most certainly can do that definition. And Russian and China have both done that quite unambiguously.

                  So you’re in the right. But you’ll never win an argument against them because lies are truth.

            • socsa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              These are Leninists who believe that socialism cannot do imperialism because socialism is ideological manifest destiny. Nevermind that this was more or less one of the original debates between Trotsky and Lenin on how do do “global communism.”

              They like to redefine words to carry whatever ideological weight they want, because it’s much easier than introspection. Like how they will carry the “Nazi means anti-Russian” banner to unironically defend mass deportation children from Ukraine. "Obviously it can’t be the UN definition of genocide, because you can’t genocide Nazis.

              I wish I was making this up…

          • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            Imagine thinking Chinese workers own the means of production, or not even knowing where the term “tankie” comes from.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The term tankie comes from the 1956 hungarian revolution/counter-revoluton (depending on who you ask) which split the British communist party, those that supported the Soviet Union suppressing it with the military were called tankies.

              The video of the man in front of the tank column related to the June 4th incident did not result in the man standing in front of the tank dying, and those tanks were leaving the area where the violence occurred and is not where the word tankie comes from like I believe you are suggesting.

              • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, I was suggesting that tankie came to describe USSR supporters (which modern apologists project onto Russia, as if the wall never fell). I am aware of the origin of the term.

                My comment was a reply on people supporting whatever Russia and China do. It takes a jab at both.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  No, I was suggesting that tankie came to describe USSR supporters

                  No, it started that way? Do you mean started to be more all encompassing? I literally explained the origin of the term one comment ago. Also, I dont see how this

                  " Imagine thinking Chinese workers own the means of production, or not even knowing where the term “tankie” comes from. "

                  -can mean what you say you meant.

                  (which modern apologists project onto Russia, as if the wall never fell).

                  Anyone who has researched the USSR enough to cut through capitalist propaganda knows Russia is now a neolib-ish bourgeois democracy.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is there a way to jump instances and bring all your content/moderation with you? I really didn’t sign up for tankie voat, but I have growing communities in this instance.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unfortunately not right now, maybe in the future. You can make the community on the new instance, stop all posting on the old one and pin a link to the new one so users are forced over, but that might not work and you could lose a largish portion of your userbase.

      • mim@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s true.

        However, I feel like the ones from lemmygrad are slightly more unhinged.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Its a very weakly sourced state sponsored media article reporting on their state enemy. You have to be willfully credulous to believe their claims without further proof.

    • Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t mean that reports are false just because two states are enemies (which is an exaggeration).

        • Durotar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That statement is illogical. You must have huge problems with the simplest logic to argue that. You can’t bent logic by twisting what I said. Stop clowning.

          • ☭ Blursty ☭@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            It really is. Try it, next time you read a China Bad article, just decide that it’s bullshit first, then check into it and you’ll be proven right.

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Come in with preconceived notions and never second guess yourself? Sure, whatever.

              • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Doing research to prove your assumptions correct or incorrect is literally how science works.

              • abraxas@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I swear some of these people have never even been to China. I’ve had the opportunity, and had a lot of Chinese expat friends. I will say THEY believe the same as rest of the world does on a lot of these issues. I was told in no uncertain terms by my tour guide not to say anything about “things you might have heard” when I went to Tienanmen Square. And trust me, the soldiers everywhere with automatic weapons were enough to dissuade me from THINKING about it.

                There are a lot of differences that can be passed off as unpleasant cultural differences (like the one guy was a second class citizen and couldn’t get a city passport because he was from a village… the other guy had a full country Visa with zero effort because he grew up in Beijing), but other things “yeah, we’d look up the truth on all that stuff, but we had to work hard to get around the censors and some of our friends got in caught and got in trouble for doing it”.

                These tankies never seem to cover the part where the Chinese government is ACTIVELY suppressing this stuff in China. I could walk up to the site of the Bonus Army massacre and LOUDLY announce “I can’t believe the US government opened fired on American troops here over a peaceful protest” and not so much as draw police attention.

          • socsa@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            A black and white world where objective measures of press freedoms are apparently inversely proportional to trustworthiness of said journalists.

            Random blog with a Soviet flag? Impossible to be propaganda, because only capitalism can do a propaganda.

            Some of the world’s oldest free media with a long history of investigating the British government? Literally nothing but propaganda.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A black and white world where objective measures of press freedoms are apparently inversely proportional to trustworthiness of said journalists.

              Oh my god, are you seriously claiming you can objectively measure press freedoms while saying socialists live in a black and white world? Just want to give you a chance to walk back your statement

              • socsa@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                I am quite curious to know your methodology for measuring press freedom so we can compare and perhaps find something which can be considered locally objective.

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You’re retreating into “locally” objective. In this topic you’re not going to get agreement on what constitutes press freedom, so it is pointless. My point is that the claim of objective press freedom existing is ridiculous. You walked it back, but to a position that still seems ridiculous to me.

                  For example, I dont believe there is such thing as a free press. Any org that can produce a press machine is going to influence that press, whether that is a government or private interests. Editorial freedom isn’t possible, editorial control just ranges from the subtle to the overt.

            • fishtacos@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Wow, what? Communists talk openly about propaganda… You have no idea what you’re talking about.

              We are well aware what our biases are. We are trying to get westerners to see their own biases. Being called out as hypocrites feels like an attack, but when we say everyone have biases, we know it’s true about us too.

              Absorb news from a wide variety of sources, including sources from other countries, and you’ll see that the BBC is in fact biased against China.

              It takes time, and reading a lot, and you won’t get it from Lemmy/Reddit/twitter(or X or whatever now)/FB. Even ground news only has so many sources. And you know what, the BBC does great coverage for a lot of things, they are a pretty high quality source for a lot of news. But yeah, everyone has biases, and the BBC is biased against China.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t mean that reports are false just because two states are enemies (which is an exaggeration).

        If they were strongly cited I would not be criticizing people believing them. All sources are biased, the question is how factual a source is.

        The BBC is strongly biased against China. If they make claims without proof the most logical course of action is to not assume they are telling the truth and not incorporate what they say into your beliefs. (Note that this is different than “assume they are lying”)

      • MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, China was a major ally, but it is showing its dark (autocratic) side lately.

      • socsa@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t these threads wild? These people don’t want to engage in actual discussion here. They just want to remove your agency by calling you brainwashed, do the sealion “source” thing, and then ad hominem away any sources you do provide.

        I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again - the world deserves a better class of communist.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It isn’t sealioning to expect a government or corporate news agency to provide strong citations when making contentious claims.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They just want to remove your agency by calling you brainwashed

          Unlike when the liberals in this very thread accuse people of being brainwashed or paid shills, because then it is righteous!

          do the sealion “source” thing,

          lmao what dastardly trolls they are to care about sourcing

          and then ad hominem away any sources you do provide.

          Like you’d ever accept People’s Daily or whatever. The “tankies” need to mostly rely on liberal outlets because you will discard reporting out of China (etc.) out of hand.

          the world deserves a better class of communist.

          If we had a better class of communist, you’d hate them too because you’d believe everything you’re told about them, just like you do with the existing breeds.

    • Freeman@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw a piece about the shadow police in germany lately. I am sure that the chinese foreign police exists.

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have no doubt, every nation has secret police. I simply doubt they are doing what the article suggests theyre doing. It seems to me the article is interested in explaining why there aren’t many uyghur Muslims joining their narrative and why a lot of them are supportive of China and feel their culture is respected.

  • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would that work if they have a toxic family and decided to kill 2 birds with one stone?

    I mean if the CCP threatened my family while I’m abroad, I’d just go: “Lol go ahead, idgaf. They’re toxic anyways. Thanks for getting rid of them for me.” 😎

    But too bad my toxic family is already here and I had to endure their abuse. 😥

    • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That does assume that person’s with a toxic FOO have been able to emotionally distance themselves from them.

      That’s a tall order.

    • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean I have some pretty toxic family members as well, but at least a few of them are decent or innocent people. Pretty much everyone is going to have at least one family member that they care about even if most are shit heads.

  • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A UN Resolution of global south nations:https://undocs.org/pdf?symbol=en/A/HRC/41/G/17

    We express our firm opposition to relevant countries’ practice of politicizing human rights issues, by naming and shaming, and publicly exerting pressures on other countries. We commend China’s remarkable achievements in the field of human rights by adhering to the people-centered development philosophy and protecting and promoting human rights through development. We also appreciate China’s contributions to the international human rights cause.

    World Bank Investigation of Xinjiang:https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/statement/2019/11/11/world-bank-statement-on-review-of-project-in-xinjiang-china

    When allegations are made, the World Bank takes them seriously and reviews them thoroughly. In line with standard practice, immediately after receiving a series of serious allegations in August 2019 in connection with the Xinjiang Technical and Vocational Education and Training Project, the Bank launched a fact-finding review, and World Bank senior managers traveled to Xinjiang to gather information directly…The team conducted a thorough review of project documents, engaged in discussions with project staff, and visited schools directly financed by the project, as well as their partner schools that were the subject of allegations. The review did not substantiate the allegations.

    Organization of Islamic Cooperation praises Chinese handling of Xinjiang:https://www.oic-oci.org/docdown/?docID=4447&refID=1250

    Welcomes the outcomes of the visit conducted by the General Secretariat’s delegation upon invitation from the People’s Republic of China; commends the efforts of the People’s Republic of China in providing care to its Muslim citizens; and looks forward to further cooperation between the OIC and the People’s Republic of China.

    http://www.inp.net.pk/china-lauds-oics-resolution-on-xinjiang/

    Egyptian media delegates visit Xinjiang: https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/430738-egyptian-media-delegates-provide-a-detailed-insight-of-the-situation-in-xinjiang

    The recently published report also brings forth some interesting facts related to the religious freedom as opposed to the western propaganda. The report provides a strong testimonial by the visiting delegates who clearly state, “the in houses of worship such as the Id Kah Mosque in Kashgar, modern facilities abound, providing water, electricity and air conditioning. Local clerics told the visitors that their religious activities had been very well protected”. “The conditions here are very good,” said Abdelhalim Elwerdany, of Egypt’s Al-Gomhuria newspaper. “I could feel that local Muslims fully enjoy religious freedom.”

    Also Adrian Zenz is a complete moron:

  • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is pretty crazy if true. I wonder if it has any connections to the alleged “ghost” CCP police stations that were reported around in Canada. I believe it was being claimed the stations were being used to bully Chinese people that were in Canada.

      • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the source, definitely gonna read it later.

        when I researched I thought a couple of things were off curious what light the article shines on that

      • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know man. The RCMP has recently charged one of their officers for allegedly putting pressure on people of Chinese origin. Now, I’ll admit this a pretty different situation than the “secret Chinese police stations” and, as far as I know, no charges been brought up in their cases or anything found during their investigations. However, China does appear to be putting pressure on its citizens from abroad using clandestine methods. Is the West likely doing much the same? shrug I haven’t heard about that myself but regardless this kind of practice shouldn’t be done by any country.

        Anyway I found this National Post article which has more details:

        https://nationalpost.com/news/b-c-man-places-chinese-police-station-sign-in-front-of-rcmp-detachment

        Anyway, I appreciate the source but I gotta say I don’t find it very credible. It starts going down a rabbit hole that this all part of some CIA backed psyop, but I don’t really believe that. These types of stories have been popping up around the world and I doubt the CIA has that kind of reach in some attempt to… what… make China look bad?

        • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          These types of stories have been popping up around the world

          Can you specify? How many cases do you know? And in which countries? Otherwise its hard to guess if the CIA can fake it. But I’d say if it is up, say to a hundred then: Yes totally something the CIA could and would do.

          and I doubt the CIA has that kind of reach in some attempt to… what… make China look bad?

          To influence public opinion and manufacture consent for a wide range of political actions against the only threat to US hegemony in existence

          That is not even close to the “too ridiculous for the CIA to do” scale. They once produced Bin-Laden dolls whose face would scrape off to reveal a demon. It was called operation Devils Eyes.

          You have to imagine people sit there 8h a day to hatch schemes on how to best sway public opinions

          Some of the assasination attempts on Castro were also quite ridiculous.

          • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s in the article I referenced:

            “Last December, a report from NGO Safeguard Defenders said it had identified 102 Chinese police stations operating in 53 countries, including five in Canada.”

            To be fair, the article you posted claims that NGO is some kind of CIA backed organization. I don’t know if I really buy that, but I suppose it is possible. Antcedotally, I’ve heard other stories of China doing stuff like this (particularly when there were a lot of Hong Kong protests) but I’ll admit I don’t have much first hand evidence myself. It’s just, on a balance of probabilities, I’m much more likely to believe that an authoritarian regime like China is capable of doing it.

            Also that example about the “Devil Eyes” dolls is bit disengenious to bring up. Your own source states that they only ever built a few prototypes. Granted, it does say an anonymous Chinese source says hundreds were shipped to Pakistan, but again I don’t think we can really trust China’s take on this.

            The CIA has lots of looney plans (likely a product of Military-Industrial complex), but not many come to fruition becasue they are not practical.

            • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              the article you posted

              Wasn’t me. I haven’t read that article yet

              It’s in the article I referenced

              As I obviously have not read yours. I will catch up on both. Thanks for quoting that anyways

              NGO is some kind of CIA backed organization

              I wouldn’t be surprised. The CIA has a history of backing NGOs like this dating back to the Congress for Cultural Freedom whose goal it was to purge leftism in europe of communism. Nowadays they usually use the NED for that though

              … “Devil Eyes” … is bit disengenious to bring up. … they only ever built a few prototypes. … I don’t think we can really trust China’s take on this.

              Whether or not it is true they only ever produced prototypes I don’t think its disingenious as my point was not the impact it made but how the CIA operates and this is a good example as it simultaneously needs to be: somewhat recent, yet not too recent so its publicly known (declassified or uncovered) and ridiculous.

              I wanted to push back on your notion that something sounds too ridiculous for the CIA to pursue, which generally is just not a framework in which to understand the CIA.

              The Chinese source was not “China’s take on this” it was a source of the washington post in China where the CIA allegedly commissioned the dolls (which they did not dispute according to wapo).

              But since you brought up the trustworthyness of a take: I wouldn’t trust the CIAs take on this, which is the source claiming “too their knowledge” only 3 dolls were produced.

              But personally I think its clear these dolls never got into the hands of many customers, its just such a dumb plan.

              Antcedotally, I’ve heard other stories of China doing stuff like this

              Historically many narratives about China have been proven false or misrepresented too (social credit system, authenticity of tiananmen papers,…) thats why I am sceptical.

              Thanks to the illusory truth effect this anecdotal gut feeling is terribly vulnerable to manipulation. It happens in media all the time, i.e. some rightists believe the LGBTQ community is full of groomers bc its what they are told all the time (not sure if this is a good example, I just wanted to pick a partisan one)

              If the targets voice is not represented its even worse bc the claims stay largely uncontested and false claims can stack up (one misrepresentation giving you the feeling “this is totally something they would do”, strenghtening your misconception), creating a gut feeling in the population that is wrong. A fairly uncontested example for such a deconstruction of a foreign target through the media would be Iraq pre invasion. You can look up polls from around the time and correlate it with the reporting of the time. This is also the effect of filterbubbles of course filtering out the opinions you lose the corrective

              Whether or not the CIA was/is involved in influencing public opinion like this (personally I have no doubt), this is absolutely what is happening WRT reporting on China ATM, there is no corrective and false claims just stack up.

              Look at the histeria that an off-course weather balloon caused: people would line up at an event to scream at Biden about the balloon, even though the initial press release of the pentagon clearly states that this was not an uncommon phenomenon and that there is no threat associated with it (granted its longer than that and one can have a discussion about some of the wording, but this comment is long enough already)

              • SpooneyOdin@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Fair enough. I appreciate the detailed response. I agree there’s lots of reasons to be skeptical of claims made against China. At the same time, I think we can still be critical of China’s actions and not merely dismiss everything against China as some CIA backed plot.

                • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I agree, the best thing is to not jump to conclusions neither the conclusion “Everything is 100% CIA lies” nor the conclusion “China bad” and be patient with individual topics before stepping onto the emotional roller coaster

                  I’ve listened to a podcast (“Silk and Steel”) by a Chinese living in the US and he describes the media coverage of China in the West as skewed, but he describes it as narrowed onto a certain slice of Chinese reality that is there just blown out of proportion.

                  I don’t remember his exact words and I am not an English native so I might not transfer the nuance precisely. But along those lines is what I remember. And even IIRC its just the opinion of one person, but it stuck with me. Tbf that was years ago though and narrative has certainly picked up since then

                  Thank you for the appreciation, I have to say I have yet to get used to the discussions on lemmy being seemingly way more good-faithed than on reddit!

    • Freeman@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just saw an investigative piece about the chinese shadowpolice in germany by a reputable reporter-team. I am convinced they exist.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Didn’t know these kinds of people existed until I showed up here. They must have been hiding on reddit or something it’s insane how braindead these people are.

      • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mostly they got banned wherever they congregated on Reddit. Not knowing they existed seems like a significant oversight, but to be expected with the way that China is depicted to you.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t realize people like legitimately fell for such obvious lies from an authoritarian government. I can understand closed of citizens inside the country but people with access to so much I formation that prooces otherwise and yet they cling to a totalitarian regimes commiting genocide. It’s sad honestly.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            And yet surely these people must have a reason to believe it, don’t they? Even if one assumes they are wrong, this doesn’t just come from nowhere, it must have some cause to seem reasonable to them, right? They are like you, thinking human beings, and no progress can be made in understanding the disagreement if you start from them being, in so many words, intellectually inferior to you.

            • yeather@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              The beliefs of Marxism / Leninism are fairly noble, but never once in the history of them or any of their offshoots (i.e communism / socialism) have they ever worked. In the end the revolutions all colapse into themselves and turn into authoritarian capitalist regimes. China has been an authoritarian government since the beginning and is run by an evil dictator.

              • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                The beliefs of Marxism / Leninism . . . or any of their offshoots (i.e communism / socialism)

                I suppose it’s just a matter of syntax, but I first read this as a very silly statement wherein “communism” is an offshoot of “Marxism / Leninism”.

                Anyway, don’t worry, I’m familiar with the “real Marxism has never been tried!” line that some people have for various reasons, but I a) can’t see how this is particularly useful as a distinction compared to other states and b) don’t think this remotely answers my question.

                I think you and I both know why the so-called marxists who say “real Marxism has never been tried” exist, or at least our beliefs on the matter are a close enough parallel that it’s not a very enticing discussion, but what you have failed to do is explain the basic prompt of why a westerner would support a state like China.

                I can give an internally-consistent answer for these groups and yourself coming to their beliefs: You all live to varying degrees in a bubble of western Discourse and pseudo-historical mythmaking.

                The “never been tried” Marxist believes everything the State Department says about its enemies but still believes in some sort of ever-failing communism like a good little Trot because they are, for the time being and in part motivated by their social position, appalled by what capitalism has wrought even in the imperial core and want something better even if they struggle to conceive what that could be in practical terms, since every success of socialism has been transmuted into an ultimate failure. Nonetheless, “there must be an alternative,” and that possibility, however hazy, is worth fighting for over the corrupt establishment.

                The liberal believes everything the State Department says about its enemies and comes to the reasonable conclusion (if we assume the State Department is honest) that socialism has failed its many chances and therefore “there is no alternative”. They are more likely to have a higher social position than the previous group because it is much easier to say capitalism works when it works for you.

                The “tankie” is typically the worst off of the three groups in social position, with long term prospects that look pretty grim, and this has pushed them into a desperation to find a way to improve their prospects since they can’t afford a hazy future and communalist circle-jerking but the invisible hand of the free market would crush them even faster, so they do something that these other groups are not driven to, which is some level of serious research, and by this means they were able to accept that the State Department lies as often as it speaks and that they have been born into the slightly unnerving position of being nestled in the imperial core as the empire runs roughshod over as much of the world as it can. Whether they simply concluded that states like Russia or Iran were plainly the lesser of two evils for their opposition to NATO, or they found a more extreme position like genuinely believing in the project of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, they were able to develop a framework that gives them a path forward where previously they felt they had none.

                Of course, various biographical details can also be vitally important, like being the descendant of defectors vs generic diaspora, or knowing people who are. I’m white as the driven snow, but I know Chinese people from both groups. The “tankie” one didn’t persuade me on very much (though I learned a lot about the Korean War and various elements of the 20th century PRC) but the diaspora descendant taught me things that I still am trying to process, because they made genuinely ridiculous claims (e.g. Mao burning down libraries during the Civil War) that I have not been able to find repeated by even the most ridiculous anti-PRC rag when I search online. There’s a bizarre sort of cult to intergenerational trauma that seems to emerge where stories are embellished and exaggerated over time (deliberately or not) and the truth of these stories cannot be questioned because, in so many words, “it’s their truth.”

                I meant it when I said I’m still processing it, because to me it’s in many respects a bizarre behavior even though it’s actually not that hard to explain sociologically (view it like religious trauma and it’s trivially simple). I think there is more to learn from it, but I couldn’t tell you what.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, the reason diaspora isn’t speaking out against China is because there’s a conspiracy to silence them.~

    There can’t possibly be any other explanation.~

    • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well I, as a former citizen of China, do “speak out” against CCP as in family discussions, in online forums, and sometimes with classmates in school, but I don’t “speak out” as in actually participate in protests. Demonstrations just isn’t my thing. Protesting against CCP gets you labeled a “race traitor”. I mean honestly, with all the racial problems in the US, and having to deal with my abusive family, I really don’t have to energy care about CCP anymore. It’s dead to me. I view China just like how an anti-fascist German view Nazi Germany. There’s no point of protests. It’s beyond anything a protest can fix. Like… why do I even care, it isn’t even my country anymore.

      Edit: Also, it isn’t a conspiracy that ethnic Chinese (I’m gonna use the term “ethnic Chinese” because this applies regardless of citizenship status) people don’t “speak out”. People just value “Social Harmony” more than being correct. Like if you live abroad, why care about what happens back in China? Most ethnic Chinese people who lives abroad don’t really feel welcome in their new country, so why be against your former country if you aren’t even sure if you are actually safe in your new one? You don’t end up in a situation where you have no safe harbor in the world. Ethnic Chinese people living abroad believe China will accept them again in-case their living situation abroad goes south, so they don’t want to get on the bad side of the Chinese government. Like what happened with the Chinese Exclusion act in the US more than 100 years ago, and also the Japanese Internment Camps. Maybe you disagree with the thought process, but that is what most ethnic Chinese people think.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No, clearly the Chinese government has your family hostage and that’s why you aren’t out protesting.~ Didn’t you read the article? 😏

        • 001100 010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If your comment (the top-level one) was supposed to be sarcasm, you need a /s tag because there are people actually being serious saying that “it’s a conspiracy, couldn’t be any other possible explanation” stuff.

          But also, the “hostage” thing is not entirely false, just very exaggerated. They only take your family “hostage” if you are like a leader of a protest or something. But I doubt they care if you are just some forum user that has no followers and “protesting” online. They got too many dissidents within their jurisdiction to care about those abroad.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As someone who legitimately has family in China and who visits them and speaks to them in Mandarin, there is 100% a chilling effect caused by CCP autocracy.

      But I am eager to hear how a bunch of people who have never been and don’t speak the language know more about this because they read a pamphlet.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, as someone who merely visited I got enough eyefulls and earfulls to know you don’t want the Chinese government to know you exist for any reason.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Such cowardly actions befit a gang of criminals, not the righteous leadership of a proud nation. The Chinese people deserve far better.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have any issue with that, the less toxic people I have to interact with on here the happier I’ll be. I encourage anybody who finds my comments and posts upsetting to block me and move on.

      • DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Don’t feed the troll. He’s an actual professional troll who will try his hardest to drag you into a debate. I like to just keep editing my comments with new links that refute his claims, and that’s when he totally loses it and gives me -30 and himself +55 updoots on a post with a grand total of 18 votes. He’s really aggressive but he’s not very good at his job.

        Edit: I can see he has gone through my post history and downvoted everything so I have 0 or negative karma or whatever it’s called… and he did it a week afterwards. He’s a spiteful little troll, isn’t he? I don’t care about updoots. You can’t silence the truth, you dumb fuck.

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most notably, they will not actually engage in any real discussion on these topics. They only want to shut down discussion by calling everyone brainwashed. They will offer not a single critical word against China or Russia, past present or future. Obviously this analysis is very noteworthy, and the conjecture that these societies are above reproach makes for a very good faith argument. Especially when combined with the intellectually honest strategy of removing their opponent’s agency by calling them brainwashed. Truly a master debater.

          • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s proof of your integrity that you admit good things about China . . . Because surely you will eventually, right?

            • socsa@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I have no idea where you get that idea from. I have tons of praise for China - the culture, the people, the food, the history. I speak ok Mandarin, have family in China and visit once a year typically. I probably have more direct experience with China than anyone on lemmygrad. Unlike those folks, I’m not just here to troll and disrupt conversation. I want to have real conversations about the good as well as the bad. It’s the tankie trolls who will never actually engage in good faith. It’s the surest sign someone is, in fact, just a troll imo.

              • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re changing the question, I mean the Chinese government and so did you in your previous comment. I’m sure you’re aware that “tankies” don’t just give a blanket endorsement of, for example, patriarchal social norms in China, and believe there are many cultural elements which must be the object of struggle. One must conclude that you didn’t include that because it was beyond the scope of your claim when you said “China”.

                What was that about bad faith?

                • socsa@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The tankies on Lemmy absolutely give it a blanket endorsement. Trust me I’ve tried many times to seek a real discussion on this topic. Specifically with regard to the hukou caste system and lack of public trials. I think this is very low hanging fruit tbh.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, just people who uncritically regurgitate propaganda, and screech about everybody who disagrees with them being a Russian puppet and a tankie whatever that means.

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that’s a fair point. It’s important to keep in mind that people are accepting the propaganda because they want to believe it and they understand that it serves their selfish interests.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, thank you for being understanding. I think it’s better to avoid calling people brainwashed because – as one liberal in this thread pointed out – it denies agency which our interlocutors plainly do have which makes them much more responsible for their bad epistemology than the theory of “brainwashing” allows for.

              If we want to persuade people – and I’ve seen that you have incredible enthusiasm for that cause! – we must do our best to meet them where they actually are rather than where we imagine them to be.

              I’ll get off my soapbox here, I just wanted to mention it. I wish you all the best in your efforts!

        • socsa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          And which of those things were you responding to when you yelled “bootlickers” into the void just now?

          Because from my point of view, you are the only one engaging in bad faith personal attacks here.