Hello everyone! I know that Linux GUI advanced in last few years but we still lack some good system configuration tools for advanced users or sysadmins. What utilities you miss on Linux? And is there any normal third party alternatives?

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    12 天前

    I’m willing to entertain the possibility that the linux world may be lacking in some things, but I’m pretty sure “configuration tools for sysadmins” is not one of them.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 天前

    I generally don’t miss anything graphical, once I learn how to do something from the cli I rarely feel the need to do it graphically anymore as it’s usually a lot slower

    The obvious one would be Photoshop and paint.net of course but krita does the trick

    • user_naa@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 天前

      I maybe need to correct my post. I am talking about system utilities like Device Manager or something else.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 天前

        Why would I want gui for those things? CLI is often a better interface. Being able to grep lsusb rather than scanning a gui for an entry is much better. It’s easier to pipe to an email as well. Screenshots don’t allow copy/paste…

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 天前

          As a newcomer to CLIs, GUI are great because you don’t need to know what you’re looking for. I can just open the devices window, and they’re all there, with most of the extra hardware stuff that’s not actually a real device already cleaned out.

          To do the same with a CLI would take me 10 minutes of looking up what the hardware commands are, 5 minutes figuring out flags, and 30 minutes researching entries to see if they’re important. Even just a collapsible list would make that last step so much easier. And no, I can’t grep for what I need, because I don’t know what I need, I just know something in there is important with a vague idea of what it might look like.

          Once I figure that all out for one thing, the best I can do is write that to a notes file so I don’t need to search so far next time, but there’s a good chance that I’ll need a different combination of commands next time anyway.

          Not hating on CLIs, just wishing I could figure out how to use them faster.

          • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 天前

            apropos - command to list relevant commands tldr [command] - shows the most commonly used flags/options for that program

            apropos comes installed by default (on debian at least), tldr needs to be installed with your package manager

            As someone who cannot even remember tar flags (inser xkcd here), tldr is very helpful

            Your 45 mins becomes 5 mins now. Hope that helps

          • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 天前

            Another really helpful tool is to use the fish shell instead of bash. It has tons of useful features, but my favorite is by far the autocomplete. It parses man pages to provide suggestions for flags, subcommands, even passed arguments, and each item in the results list has a description, and it’s all searchable by hitting shift+tab.

            fish autocomplete subcommands

            fish autocomplete git

            That’s what leveled up my cli game from 0-100. It’s a massive difference in usability and discoverability. And unlike things like nushell, it’s close enough to bash that you won’t feel confused if you have to use bash instead.

          • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 天前

            The name is constructed from two parts:

            1. ls: list
            2. usb: usb

            It lists usb devices that your machine (/kernel) knows has been connected; they may not necessarily be usable.

            E.g. I have some sound output device connected via USB to one machine. On most of my machines I’ve switched from pulseaudio to pipewire¹, and I figured I’d bring that machine closer to the others so there’s less variance. Unfortunately the sound output device didn’t want to work with pipewire. The problem manifested as no sound and pipewire not listing the device. lsusb helped me know that the machine at the very least recognized the device, but wasn’t currently able to use it. (It did actually also show up as an error in dmesg -H, but reinstating pulseaudio let the device work again as normally. So now I just have to live with a situation where some machines use pipewire because bluetooth and others use pulseaudio because … usb?¹)

            ¹ There’s a memory of ALSA vs OSS I didn’t want to be reminded of

              • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 天前

                I think I wouldn’t find it particularly useful, as I’m used to the quasi-programming I can do in a terminal. The shell commands take some time & effort to learn, but once you’re over that hump, being able to extract and compose information is really good. The primary shell tools I’d miss in a gui are |, jq, awk, sed and grep/rg, as well as for, if, while, variables, and having everything in one lightweight window.

  • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 天前

    Maybe tangential but this reminded me of how much I hate setting up systemd timers/services. I refuse to accept that creating two files in two different directories and searching online for the default timer and service templates is an okay workflow over simply throwing a cron expression next to the command you want to run and being done with it. Is there really no way we can have a crontab-equivalent that virtually converts into a systemd backend when you don’t need the extra power? I feel like an old person that can’t accept change but it’s been a decade and I’m still angry.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 天前

      This is a configuration declaration abstraction issue. Systemd timers and services are more like primitives.

      In NixOS, we have an abstraction that allows simple declaration of a service and timer that runs some script.

      As an example, I use this to export my paperless for backup daily in a way that is safe (paperless itself cannot run during that time, guaranteed by systemd) and simple:

      https://github.com/Atemu/nixos-config/blob/ca0d39eb98c62424208487f973573478268048b4/modules/paperless/module.nix#L59-L95

      (Even without NixOS domain knowledge you should be able to follow what’s going on here.)

      All that’s needed in order to cause a systemd timer to be created for this service is to declare the startAt = "daily"; at the bottom.

  • ubergeek@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 天前

    A decent GUI LDAP client.

    Yes, I know, I can use slapcat and all… But holy hell, I’m tired of writing basic LDAP files to populate a new domain. And, no, I really don’t want to spin up a webserver just to run a web based GUI that I NOW have to ensure is locked down.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 天前

      LACT. Though I don’t know if it can OC Nvidia, Nvidia support is quite new.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        11 天前

        til about this one, nice. i wish discoverability for linux software was better.

        • WereCat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 天前

          Same here. I’m using CorrCTRL for my 6800XT and the VRAM OC is not working properly, will give LACT a try

          • Atemu@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 天前

            Chances are that it doesn’t work there either. What actually does the OC is the kernel; the GUIs merely write the desired values into the correct files in /sys.

        • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 天前

          I usually just feed my questions into three different LLMs plus ddg with site:reddit and then check consensus. As good as it gets.

          But then last time I’ve managed to discover DeadBeeF through IRC.

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 天前

            yeah thats how i find them, we have good app stores on linux that could use some community curation though!

            its common on linux for software to be abandoned, only for a fork to pop up elsewhere and it gets annoying.

  • algernon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 天前

    I have Emacs, and I have my NixOS configuration. That’s all the GUI system configuration I need.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 天前

    One thing I kind of miss is autohotkeys on windows. It was relatively easy to do things like set keyboard keys to act as mouse keys. I did that once when I was getting over tendonitis.

    These days I have a keyboard with mouse keys on it and a trackball also with mouse keys. I can use the middle button on the trackball and scroll with it, but I can’t use the middle button on the keyboard and scroll with the trackball, which would be more ergonomic for me. Haven’t figured that one out yet.

    That said, I mostly don’t miss GUI stuff. I use a tiling window manager and command line utilities to do most things on my system. Its kind of primitive I guess, but the benefit is it works exactly the same on remote systems, headless servers, etc.

  • manicdave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 天前

    I’d like some kind of visual task scheduler instead of having to read up on how to do cron jobs every time.

          • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 天前

            Dystopia is having to learn a whole new system and manually punch in commands in VIM instead of just entering “0400” and clicking “Every day” in a GUI simply to run a scheduled backup because some cyberpunks think it’s cool to stare at the black and green terminal emulator into the early morning and think that everybody else enjoys doing the same so we really don’t need a GUI.

    • GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 天前

      I’ve completely switched from cron to systemd timers for everything. I feel like they are a lot easier to remember and keep track of! Plus, getting logs for free is pretty nice as well

  • arglebargle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 天前

    Given that windows administration is powershell these days they kind of are similar.

    Windows is missing so much in their guis abilities (like copy text) that I wonder what there is you are missing.

    Edit: Although this is not an admin function, one thing that bothers me about windows, A LOT is that the file explorer does not show free space while I am in the current directory. Dolphin will do it even for SMB shares. Also you can click the drop down and examine all drives right there instead of have to back to the left and ruining your view in explorer. And don’t get me started about how you can’t split views in Windows explorer. This is just one everyday task where windows GUI is lacking in features even though it is not an admin tool.

  • vvvvv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 天前

    IrfanView. Nothing comes even close. I would probably move to Linux if not for that.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 天前

      Irfanview!

      It’s FAST, it’s SMALL, it’s PURE POWERRR

      I never understood why there isn’t anything even remotely close to it in Linux. Kde has Gwenview which is awful slow, bloated yet barely has any features at all.

      There is a way to run it through wine but that is awful. Cane e start a GoFundMe for the dev to make a Linux KDE release with Deb and rpm files? I’ll happily contribute.

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 天前

      For real! Every time I spend real periods of time with Linux (and a random year with a MacBook Pro a friend wanted to get rid of). It always hits a point where I need to view images and can’t find anything that matches IrfanView. I have tried XnView and it is way too much with regards to the UI and features I don’t need. The most frustrating thing (and this applies to most others I tried) is handling going through a folder of images that are different resolutions. IrfanView has the option to both scale the program’s window based around the image size, and also be set to scale images if the are larger than my display resolution.

      It is a very weird combination of those two things that drives me nuts. There are settings in XnView that kind of work but break. Like it might adjust the image that is large, but then the program’s UI will not shrink to fit a small image (the window will just stay large and have large black borders). Or it will shrink the window to the width of a large image, but not scale and the height will still require scrolling up and down to see all of it. The funny part is that I don’t even look at my saved images all the time. But shit is like a hard slam on the breaks at high speed.

      I did end up just dealing with the kind of weird clunkyness of running it via WINE while on the Mac as it was my only PC at the time. Which was still better than not having it for my use-case. Just weird how it has been the only image viewer (with mid-level editing options) that has “felt” correct ever since I first tried it out over like 17 years ago.