• SwizzleStick@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d honeytrap this with a software camera that just plays filth and shock sites on a loop :)

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The goal with software like windows is to eventualy take away all control. If you can run unaproved software, you can’t even join the teams call. Then you will see stuff like this.

    • BennyInc@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      5 months ago

      You’d get a pious, stating that someone paid 1.99 to turn your camera an. For just 5.99 you can make sure it stays off.

      This could also be implemented as a bidding war like eBay.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yknow one great thing that costs about 1.99 (one time cost)?

    Those little plastic slidy bits that cover up the laptop webcam and mic.

    • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s weird that people used to be concerened with covering their laptop camera, but people don’t care about their phone camera.

          • Carl@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            You can’t guess correctly someone’s shoe size and leg length using an accelerometer. There are factors that drastically change the results.

            • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Enough data over time I bet you could. Get a couple drop recordings, arm swing, common heights of beds/desks/chairs, you could find it.

              Would it be automated or easy? Hell no. But you can do it. We’ve discovered more with less

              • Carl@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Everyone’s bodies are all different in unique ways. Also some might have a limp, or crutches, prosthetics, different size feet, wider feet, extremely small feet(while being tall). There would never be enough data. Unless you were there in person measuring.

                • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Well, you have angle of tge thigh and speed and time between strides, giving us stride length assuming their phone is in their pocket, which would be easy to tell. Then you have foot on floor over time and speed, which would give you appoximate shoe length depending on their foot fall. But you could guess that based on axis bounce/force. You could probably guess their weight and gender too.

            • Dale'sDeadBug@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Samsung health can track some crazy metrics from just the Galaxy watch. I wouldn’t be surprised what else they can accurately estimate. Pic of the data from a recent run.

  • YTG123@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fortunately, browsers have safeguards against this sort of thing (activating the camera without user interaction)

    …right?

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 months ago

      Zuck always has a piece of tape over his camera when you see his laptop. That’s all you need to know.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Both my work laptop and personal laptop have mechanical shutters that can only be opened by hand.

      They’re both Thinkpads.

          • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I have both a t14 g1 and g3. With each generation, the keyboard gets more trash. I even tested out my friend’s new recent generation x1 carbon yoga and the keyboard was also bad. Lower travel and didn’t feel as solid.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Most Dell latitudes and precisions also have a physical shutter.

        I love that feature. It makes me more comfortable around the computer because no one can look at me without my consent.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which series how long ago?

            I doubt the 3000 series has them because they suck, but all the 5000 series laptops I have used have had a shutter. Granted, I’m only really referring to laptops that released within the last 7 years or so.

            I currently have a latitude 5430 and a brand new precision 3490 and they both have a shutter, but that’s not too surprising considering that they look identical to each other.

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Makes sense. I had a E6440, E7470, and 7490. The E6440 was a beast of a machine, and the E7470 fell off a 14 foot ladder and still survived, despite missing a corner… The NVMe drive was barely holding on 😅

    • Hudell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just last week we found a bug in our system in that if an user accepts a meet on pc while also having the phone app open, the meet is opened in both devices, - that alone could end very badly.

    • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      In my experience people click accept without reading or thinking, and usually remember this setting which they may have already done previously.

      In any case all my cameras have physical blockers

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s a fucking joke and so many of you are being smug with “not me!”

  • missandry351@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    My camera has a cover 😂😂😂 I hope you like your screens pitch black because it’s the only thing you will see