A perpetual stew, also known as forever soup, hunter’s pot, or hunter’s stew, is a pot into which foodstuffs are placed and cooked, continuously. The pot is never or rarely emptied all the way, and ingredients and liquid are replenished as necessary. Such foods can continue cooking for decades or longer if properly maintained. The concept is often a common element in descriptions of medieval inns.

Foods prepared in a perpetual stew have been described as being flavorful due to the manner in which the ingredients blend together. Various ingredients can be used in a perpetual stew such as root vegetables, tubers (potatoes, yams, etc.), and various meats.

  • BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Fun fact: ever had soup at a restaurant, and then made it at home but it didn’t taste quite the same or as good? There’s two main reasons:

    1. If it’s a restaurant that actually makes their own soups (versus them being shipped in in a bag to be reheated), they’re very likely using leftovers to make your soup. So unless you’re using the exact same ingredients as the restaurant, it’s not going to taste the same.

    2. The bigger reason being that they likely made the soup you’re eating at least the day before it’s served to you. This gives the ingredients of the soup time to marry, this is that “blend together” they’re talking about. This takes time, regardless of what you’re cooking, but it gives the ingredients the necessary time overnight to just… Become a better soup.

    The leftovers they use have likely been marrying their flavors for a day or two before they’re put into the soup, so all of that blended flavor deliciousness is going to blend even more in the soup.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 hours ago

              If it’s water based, the temperature won’t go over 100 C. Ideally, you’d want to simmer it below that rather than cook it at a high boil. Then you’d just need to make sure there was enough water in it that it wouldn’t all evaporate off while unattended (though more accurately, you’d want enough water to prevent the bottom part from drying out faster than more water can replace it to avoid it burning on the bottom, though that’s not so much a safety issue as it is a quality issue). Or just cover it so that any evaporating water recondenses and ends up back in the stew (though this only really slows the rate at which you lose water, since the pressure buildup will force the cover open and let some steam escape and many covers have a hole to equalize the pressure, so still keep an eye on water levels if you do a long cook).

              If all the water evaporates, then the heat can rise, potentially to a flash point of some ingredient, which would start a fire, which I’d think would be the main safety issue with a slow cook like that, assuming you maintain a safe temperature above 60 C.

              For microbial food safety, cooking over long periods is safer than soaking, generally speaking. It depends on how it is prepared/stored.

              Like canning or jarring could be considered a soak, but you need to seal the container (so no new microbes get in) and cook it in the jar (to kill off any microbes that were already on the food), or use another method that creates an environment hostile to microbes, like make it too salty or acidic.

              Or another option is to deliberately introduce microbes that play nice with our guts and allow it to ferment, which is essentially allowing it to digest a bit outside of our guts. The idea there is that any new microbes that try to move in can’t compete with the existing colony and either die off or maintain a population small enough to not cause harm.

              A long cook is basically maintaining the temperature that canning uses to kill off microbes without then sealing it away from new ones. New ones will arrive but then die due to the heat.

              Note that some foods can break down into harmful compounds if cooked long enough or can contain harmful compounds that require a boil to cook off, like kidney beans. Also if the food already contains heat-resistant toxins, obviously cooking it for a long time won’t get rid of them.

            • meliaesc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              My family in Jamaica make their goat stew overnight. Just leave the fire going. Safe? Probably not, but very widely practiced.

            • Lennny@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Low and slow? Ever had BBQ? If that shit wasn’t cooked overnight, miss me with that shit. (Unless it’s turkey or chicken obviously).

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Only should be really careful about lentils, peas, anything that sticks to the bottom.

    Cabbage is good. Beef is good. Potatoes are good. Carrots - make it go bad a bit faster when not on fire. Same with peas. And of course with onions it’ll go bad very fast.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Carrots - make it go bad a bit faster when not on fire.

      Don’t really know why carrots would make it go bad faster, but the point of a perpetual stew is to never stop cooking it. The fire is always on.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s the sugars in those vegetables. It turns the pot into a bacterial growth medium. Given enough time, something is going to survive that environment. Maybe it’ll be probiotic, but most likely, it won’t.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I followed you until the end. I know near nothing about onions other than their taste and a few cooking techniques. Is there something in them that cause other items around them to go bad quickly?

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Seems like a way to get into a Chubbyemu video… 🤔

    (Its a channel about people going to the ER because of stupid things like food poisoning, overdose on medicine, etc…)

      • Decoy321@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Hundreds of years, yes. Without issue? Definitely incorrect. It is a statistical certainty that, in the entire course of history, someone somewhere has gotten sick and died from this cooking method.

        Pedantry aside, it’s all about who’s making the stew that matters. A seasoned chef today with the sufficient knowledge of modern food safety practices can keep a stew reliably safe to eat. Some old farmer centuries ago will experience a lot more opportunities for contamination and won’t notice until they get the shits.

    • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does this mean that they started the first batch thousands of years ago with Theseus in it?

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If they boiled a human alive 2000 years ago and then kept dumping out half and filling it back up with broth, veggies and beef every day, would you eat it today?

        • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I assure you, there would not be a single atom of that human left in the soup.

          Let’s assume dumping half the soup every day for 2000 years. That’s 2000*365 = 730,000 times you’re halving the soup. Assume a human that weighs 70 kg. After the 2000 years, there’d be 70 / 2^730,000 kg left. That’s 0.000… insert roughly 220,000 zeros …0009 kg. I.e. 0, for all intents and purposes. There’d be nothing from that person left in the pot.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Only if you bang on the pot to make the water in the soup remember the human essence so eating it gives me invincibility against anything vaguely resembling being man-made.

          Walgreens could make bank selling that.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          you can neither stop me nor even tell if i’ve done it 😼

          • BossDj@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            What’s doing on here? I came because I sensed a disturbance in the Web

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              puts hands over suspiciously screenshot shaped tummy

              …nothing 👀

          • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why would someone downvote this person? I guess there’s people who are mean for no good reason everywhere…

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              yep i made the mistake of conversing with the wrong person in a politics thread and now i’m watching them go through my profile and systematically downvote everything latest to earliest 😅 you would think we are all grown adults on here but many such cases

              • P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                How much recently did this happened? I feel like I’ve already seen you before saying this…

                Well, I guess that now you got a follower!

                • spujb@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  about an hour ago 😂 it’s certainly not the first, probably not the last time

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    One minor cultural artifact of this general idea:

    Pease porridge hot, Pease porridge cold, Pease porridge in the pot, nine days old.

    • Mike D.@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Awesome.

      I was leaving the library over day with my son and looked at the cart of free books. Stone Soup was on that cart and damned sure I grabbed it.

      Gifted it to a friend on their child’s first birthday.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    So we’re germs like an issue with this? Or was it okay because it was always kept heated? I mean, obviously they theu didn’t know about germs in the middle ages, but they still woulda been there.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      As long as it is always kept hot then it shouldn’t be any problem at all. It can never be allowed to cool for very long though.

      • skoell13@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        So also keep it on while sleeping? Sounds a bit scary. I guess back in the days someone was chosen to keep the fire running anyways but nowadays? Also turnover wouldn’t happen for a few hours.

        • superkret@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Back then the fire in the stove was also what heated your home.
          And lighting fire was very difficult, so you kept it burning.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      The constant heat and the constant turnover of food/water keep it food-safe

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I sure the occasional person was unlucky and got a bowl that wasn’t cooked enough. There’s also a big difference between adding more to an 80% full pot vs a 20% full one for ingredient turnover.