Summary
The CDC has ordered its scientists to withdraw or pause pending research papers for review by the Trump administration, which is enforcing a ban on terms like “gender,” “LGBT,” and “pregnant person.”
An internal email revealed that all manuscripts, even those already accepted for publication, must comply.
Reuters confirmed the directive, which follows broader federal efforts to remove references to gender identity from government materials.
Critics warn the policy could hinder scientific integrity, as even demographic terms like “gender” may be censored.
How is this not a violation of the 1st amendment? Or are we done pretending the Constitution matters?
The USA ended on Jan 20. It’s now Fascistan.
Didn’t you get any of the memos sent from sketchy insecure servers, DOGE, etc?
you mean the translicent tissue paper banner across the Fascism finally blew away in a gentle breeze
Thats what I want to know? This isn’t Twitter choosing a policy, this is the government actually dictating what can and can’t be said. Fucked.
Twitter choosing a new policy wouldn’t be affected by the constitution.
That’s the point I’m making, yes.
The twitter thing was never a free speech issue, while this CDC thing is, yet the outcry for twitter seems to have been far louder than the actual govt censorship.
Twitter was absolutely a free speech issue, it’s just not a legal issue because despite all the propaganda the US free speech protections are very narrow in scope, only applying to the government.
It also reflects a more general trend in US mindsets where it’s only the government that can violate people’s rights and not private entities. To an extend it helps this takeover by Musk, they are not “real government” they are outsiders that are taking on the “deep” state.
US free speech protections are very narrow in scope, only applying to the government.
This is the part I’m referring to. United States constitutional free speech. Sure the twitter thing is a debatable issue, but it’s a side issue. That issue was not and is not protected by the constitution. You can argue that it should be all you want, but it currently isn’t and therefore wasn’t illegal.
The thing with the CDC is an actual violation of the constitution and a real life example of the government violating the rights it is supposed to be upholding.
You mentioned the word outcry in your first post. I therefore assume we are not discussing legality but the response of the US public. Which is not as much as you believe it should be.
The explanation is that the American public does not actually care for free speech as a human right that much. Your own dismissal of corporate censorship as not ‘actual’ censorship reinforces my point. It being illegal on it’s own won’t necessarily cause an outcry.
Especially when it’s done to people that the American public has been propagandized to hate for decades. Ivory tower scientists, ‘working’ for the government like a commie instead of working for a corporation, like Tesla.
We’re done pretending the constitution matters
The government can censor itself, this isnt something new. But it is a great example of how people dont understand how the us government works.
Best we can do is spend a decade in court getting up to the SCROTUS where you would then lose.
Good thing america doesn’t censor things like China /s
“To enforce censorship”
“Forbidden terms” is cenenting the idea that we cant say words like gender. So people wont refer to the people who disappear.
List of forbidden items was provided by the Ministry of Truth.
Gotta check your speech to make sure it’s free enough
Free Speech*
Tap for spoiler
*exceptions apply
“Hey Doc, I am here to review whatever it is that you are publishing… Me? Nope I am not a doctor but that doesn’t matter, I have this list of words in my pocket and I just need to strike them outta whatever it is that you are publishing…”
This reminds me of “The Dictator” so much.
Citizens of the US, I’ve got some Aladeen news for you.
Contains refs unpersons.
