• Tgo_up@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    How tf can killing a single person with a handgun be classified as terrorism?

    • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because they don’t like him.

      I mean Dylan fucking Roof shot dead 9 black people and they didn’t consider it terrorism.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Dylan Roof did get charged with hate crimes and was convicted on all 33 counts, leading to a death sentence. Stacking terrorism charges on top of that would have been pointless.

        Mangione, by contrast, is getting charged in a state without capital punishment. You need the terror charge to make this a First Degree Murder case. Otherwise he’s looking at parole after 15 years.

        • sean@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          This sounds like a legal playbook for would-be assassins. Kill at the cost of 15 years with parole max

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      “They’re making us CEO’s afraid, terrified even, so he’s clearly a terrorist. The implication that the working class could actually fight back against the systemic oppression we inflict on them? That’s horrifying. We can’t allow them to believe they could ever fight back. Make an example of this person.”

      The rich assholes or something

      • TheFriar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        Our most sacred 21st century nobility. Guess we’ll have to cut their taxes to show our deference

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        They used to be terrified a lot more often when history was closer to JFK, Mussolini, Lincoln, and the French Revolution. When the leaders really thought the punishment for bad leadership was their ass, they gave a shit more.

    • dumbass@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      As long as the action terrorised a large enough group of people it’s terrorism, it’s just this time, the terrorised people are the rich cunts hiding in their mansions like the traitorous cowards they are.

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      116
      ·
      9 days ago

      They also don’t charge people who blow up abortion clinics with terrorism either. They haven’t since the 60s - 70s.

      If you look it up the courts have been petitioned several times to associate abortion clinic bombings with Christian terrorism but they keep refusing to call it what it is.

      After reading about that fiasco I have very little faith our government actually has a working definition of terrorism that doesn’t shift at their convenience.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 days ago

        Hardly shocking that the christofascist courts of America refuse to classify abortion clinic bombings as domestic terrorism.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 days ago

      Local militias are perfectly acceptable as per the second amendment, as long as they’re “well regulated”, whatever that means…

      • unknown1234_5@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        9 days ago

        it means that it needs to be an actual maintained organization, not Jim bob and his buddies threatening anybody they don’t like. it’s also not a requirement, it’s only the reasoning provided.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Well, that’s when Jim Bob and his friends can get together and form a neighborhood watch group and suddenly it’s perfectly legal.

  • Python@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    9 days ago

    Was he actually Italian though? As in, speaking Italian, having an Italian passport etc.? Y’all Americans have weird definitions of nationality, just having a foreign sounding last name isn’t really enough…

    • EnoBlk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      When someone from America says they Italian or whatever they aren’t talking about nationality, it’s about ancestry, where your family came from not what county you were born in

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        No no no no…it’s about what kind of food your mom cooked when you were a kid.

        Which makes me…uhhhhhh…clown? I don’t know. She bought a lot of McDonalds.

          • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            9 days ago

            I don’t know how, but your comment wove a huge Scottish folk tale in my head revolving around fast food franchises.

            in a loud Scottish accent “Let us sing of the day that the McDonalds slew the evil Burger King and rescued Wendy from her castle top prison, which was guarded by the monstrous Jack in the Box!”

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Old MacDonald had a grill, E-I-E-I-O!
              And on his grill he put some beef, E-I-E-I-O!
              With some onions here and a pickle slice there,
              Ketchup squirt, mustard squirt,
              Buns top and bottom keep the mess off his shirt,
              Old MacDonald had a meal, E-I-E-I-O!

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Dude’s name is Luigi and his last name sounds like a pizza restaurant. That settles it for me, thank you very much.

        • 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚐@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s important to remember that the Italians and the Irish were treated as a low rung of American society not all that long ago.

          They are legitimate victims of the brunt of American hate.

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Is it though? You would be hurt if someone thought you were Italian? You must think pretty poorly of them lol

          In America since we came here and took the land from the natives we just assume everyone’s family came from somewhere else at some point in recent history. A lot of families are very proud of their ancestry and talk about it a lot.

          • Turret3857@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            My name comes from an ethnic background but I dont look ethnic so I always get weird Looks at doctors offices because of it. I think its pretty funny but I guess some people dont find it as funny to be “profiled” so to speak. It really depends on the culture you grew up in and how high tolerance actually was for that sort of thing in your life, at least thats my two cents. I dont mind it but others might.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              9 days ago

              I’m not trying to hate on you but there’s a real problem with using the word ethnic to mean non white. You are certainly ethnic. You belong to an ethnicity.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          sorry but Luigi Mangione sounds like a name a token Italian character would have in harry potter. idk how prejudiced it is to assume this is an italian name.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Buddy, I’m German, I assure you I’ve been subjected to plenty of prejudice myself. Ever seen Die Hard? So flattering (not).

              • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                Neintynein McDonald’s burgers
                Giving me a sleep disorder
                To worry, worry, super scurry
                Seek out the restroom in a hurry

            • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 days ago

              I have the perfect response to that but this is by far my favorite sub and I don’t want to risk offending the mods, so I’m afraid I can’t answer that question.

    • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      9 days ago

      According to Italian law if you have Italian ancestry, you’re Italian. There’s a whole process (with many asterisks and exceptions) in which you can apply to get your Italian passport

      • medgremlin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        My great grandfather was an Italian immigrant. My father is looking into getting an Italian passport. Maybe being a soon-to-be physician will improve my chances of getting one too. (Maybe I’ll switch from learning French to learning Italian too)

    • int_not_found@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      The word you are looking for is enthnicity. Enthnicity describes the (self-)perceived belonging to a population group. This is of course highly subjective.

      There is undeniably perception of grouping in the US based on heritage, where it doesn’t really matter when your ancestors arrived, just from where. So from an American POV it makes sense to call him Italian, because he is in the same perceived group as all the people from Italy.

      On the other hand from a European POV it doesn’t really matter, where your great grandparents come from. You are part of the US-Group, so you are American.

      This is not an exclusive US Problem, but a general migration problem & it happens everywhere. Comments like yours are the reason, why people from migrated families feel like they are in-between cultures. Instead of writing snarky comments on the internet, just accept that your perception of ethnicity is part of your ethnicity and other people can have other perceptions.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Ever heard a white American try to have the tired-ass what’s your ancestry conversation with a black American descended from slaves? It’s pretty awkward. I hate these conversations and they need to stop.

        I get it all the time because I’m 7/8 “white” and my last name is pretty distinctively German, even though it’s been anglicized.

    • _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      More of a

      visits Italy for the first time over summer

      continues to tell every living soul that their father’s father’s neighbour’s goldfish, was italian

      … scenario

    • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      They charged him with terrorism so a regular jury won’t get to make that decision. It will be a federal grand jury of selected stooges, and maybe even a secret court.

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 days ago

        A federal grand jury isn’t a replacement for a regular federal trial jury. They’re completely different things. A grand jury decides if there is a strong enough case to take the charges to trial, or if they should just be dismissed. When a grand jury isn’t used, the trial judge makes that determination themselves. I agree that the terrorism charge will affect how the trial is conducted, but I don’t know enough on that topic to comment further.

        • AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          That’s true but the way that a federal jury works is very different.

          It allows them to choose people from outside of the area in which the crime occurred.

          Making it a federal trial jury instead of a state trial jury allows them to charge this single murder against an individual perpetrated by another individual who made no public statement with a much more severe crime than the state laws that he broke would normally allow.

          It’s also important to note that making it a federal trial makes it less public as there will be no cameras allowed. They don’t want him tried in the state of New York because that could legally be televised which is a bad look when you’ve already got judicial homicide lined up and the trial is purely performative.

          Being that they can choose people from all over and that the process of jury selection is even more opaque at the federal level they can make sure there won’t be any nullification issues.

          The way they are treating Luigi whether or not he’s guilty indicates that it’s not relevant whether or not he’s guilty. They legitimately don’t care, this is about sending a message that the poors don’t get to fight back.

          • kreskin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            “Nothing will meaningfully improve” is a good translation of biden/harris’s “nothing will fundamentally change” promise.

            • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              It also addresses people pretending like knocking down statutes and similar moral victories are meaningful progress twoards addressing real problems.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s up to the state attorney to decide what charges to bring is all I’ll say.

          • wieson@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            I think that for terrorism you need the goal to instill terror in the population. Since it was so specifically targeted and only one victim, I don’t know how well it fits. Also, most of the population doesn’t feel terror, maybe he should be hit with satisfaction charges.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              The definition of terrorism doesn’t say you need to terrify people at all.

              Besides, there’s been a lot of acts that are generally agreed to be terrorist acts, that have targeted a very small group of people, such as a religious group, or even one specific individual. The IRA’s famous reply to Margaret Thatcher comes to mind.

              It seems his goal was to terrify one small group of people, namely senior people in the healthcare industry, and I think that counts.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        “Unlimited scope of people” does not require political statement.

    • FanBlade@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Have you done actual research or are you assuming because it feels right, it must be?

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    CEO’s: Second degree murder is the highest you can charge him with for killing a CEO in NY? But we want to torture him and make an example of him so the proles don’t get uppity!

    DA: No problem sirs, we can make that happen.

  • Panda (he/him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    See, his mistake was not killing him during a Career Day at an elementary school. If he took out kids as well, he wouldn’t get a terrorism charge.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 days ago

    From what the manifesto found on him allegedly said, it sounds like his actions were politically motivated. And violence in pursuit of a political goal is kinda the definition of terrorism.

    • Fleur_@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      9 days ago

      No?

      It’s very obviously an action made with intent to cause terror. It doesn’t have to be political or violent. There is often an aspect of violence and political motivation but it isn’t a requirement

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Well then define non-combatants. The person he shot was at fault for hundreds if not thousands of deaths. Saying he didn’t personally do them would be like saying a general is not responsible for their troops actions.

          • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Well then define non-combatants.

            “a person who is not engaged in fighting during a war, especially a civilian, chaplain, or medical practitioner.”

            Sure he was responsible for deaths due to denying health coverage. But he’s still a civilian.

            • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              So it was a civilian on civilian kill. Not a militant group/gang/mercenary.

              If the “battle” was pertaining to healthcare denials, he was currently battling and his group took up battle after he was gone.

              • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 days ago

                The perpetrator of an act of terrorism isn’t part of the definition. They need not be affiliated with a group or military.

                I find it curious how many people on Lemmy were gleefully posting about CEOs and billionaires being scared because of this attack, and then to see push-back about the label of terrorism (where fear is part of the outcome, hence the name).

                The saying is “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter,” right?

                • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 days ago

                  I get that we aren’t likely to agree. But “my version” of what terrorism is… You know because I’m an entitled person who gets to make shit up… but you’ll get what I mean… is to instill fear in the masses by performing an act. When you fly into a building, people say “they could have flown into my building”. When you launch a missile at a housing complex, people think that could have been my housing complex (gave up on quotes). When you blow up a communication device or a car… People think that could have been my car, phone, pager.

                  When you kill a CEO, no one is worried for their life when they say “that could have been my CEO”. They are more like shit… I wonder if Tim would get that job? Fuck I hope it’s not Pam. So unless the masses are being terrorized by an army of Pam’s… I just think it’s not terrorism

        • Fleur_@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          “Different definitions of terrorism emphasize its randomness, its aim to instill fear, and its broader impact beyond its immediate victims.”

          From the article you cited

        • kreskin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Its wildly overused though isnt it. Anyone can say almost anything and claim its political. And in the case of your definition, governments leverage terrorism on many of us on a day to day basis. Every protest met with force is terrorism, by that definition you proffered. So do we have a right of self defense against politically motivated violence?

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            It’s usually applied to a non state actor, not a government.

            The sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, for example, isn’t generally considered a terrorist attack.

  • Donkter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is there any chance that the terrorism charge is so ridiculous that it actually strengthens Luigi’s case and makes his defense better?

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yes because it specifically allows examining his motive from a political angle which allows the defense to question the character of the guy he shot, which increases the chance of nullification.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      who knows at this point. you should ask all the other Americans who were charged with terrorism when they get out of jail.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Man, if the fact that Luigi, the smiling man, and the actual shooter are visibly three different people isn’t enough of a defense, nothing is. The ruling class wants to see someone punished for this crime, and rule of law bends to their will. He will be sentenced to life in prison or death by the end of this month, mark my words.